References
- 고상숙, 고호경, 박만구, 홍예윤, 한혜숙 (2012). 수학교육평가론, 서울: 경문사. Koh, S., Ko, H., Park, M., Hong, Y., & Han, H. (2012). Evaluation of mathematics education, Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
- 고상숙, 박만구, 한혜숙, 홍예윤, 유기종, 이순용 외 (2013). 교구 및 공학도구를 활용한 수학적 과정중심평가 기반 조성, 서울: 한국과학창의재단. Koh, S., Park, M., Han, H., Hong, Y., Yoo, G., & Lee, S., et al. (2013). Building the foundation of process-based assessment using manipulatives and technologies, Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity research report.
- 박인혜 (2013). CAS형 그래핑 계산기 활용 환경에서 고등학교 수학교과서 평가문항. 석사학위논문, 건국대학교. Park, I. (2013). Investigation to high school mathematics assessment items in CAS calculators environment. Master's thesis, Kunkook University.
- 박혜숙, 이재학, 김홍종, 백석윤, 박경미, 송용진 외 (2009). 창의 중심의 미래형 수학과 교육과정 모형 연구, 서울: 한국과학창의재단. Park, H., Lee, J., Kim, H., Paik., S., Park. K., & Song, Y. et al. (2009). A study on the model of future-oriented mathematics curriculum focusing on creativity. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
- 신준식, 고정화, 박문환, 박성선, 서동엽 (2011). 수학적사고력 측정을 위한 수학 평가 도구의 개발, 한국초등수학교육학회지 15(3), 619-640. Shin, J., Ko, J., Park, M., Park, S., & Seo, D. (2011). Development of the items for the assessment of mathematical thinking, Journal of Elementary Mathemtics Education in Korea 15(3), 619-640.
- 이종희, 김선희, 채미애 (2001). 수학적 의사소통 능력의 평가기준 개발, 수학교육학연구 11(1), 207-221. Lee, C., Kim, S., & Chae, M. (2001). The assessment rubric development of mathematical communication ability, The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 11(1), 207-221.
- 전평국, 김은희, 김원경 (2002). 수학적 추론 능력 평가기준에 관한 연구, 수학교육논문집 13(2), 425-455. Jeon, P., Kim, E., & Kim, W. (2002). A study on the scoring framework for mathematical reasoning ability, Communications of Mathematical Education 13(2), 425-455.
- 정상권, 이경화, 유연주, 신보미, 김구연 (2012). 2011년 과정중심의 수학교과 평가방안 연구, 서울: 한국과학창의재단. Chung, S., Lee, K., Yoo, Y., Shin. B., & Kim, G. (2012). A study on process-focused assessment in school mathematics. seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity research report.
- 조지민, 동효관, 옥현진, 임해미, 정혜경, 손수경, 배제성 (2012). OECD 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2012 본검사 시행 보고서. 한국교육과정평가원. RRE 2012-3-1. Cho, J., Dong, H., Ok, H., Rim, H., Jung, H., & Son, S., et al. (2012). Programme for international student assessment(PISA 2012) main survey technical report. RRE 2012-3-1, KICE.
- 하미란 (2013). 그래핑 계산기를 활용한 서술형 평가문항개발에 관한 연구-중학교 9-나 단계 통계 단원을 중심으로-. 석사학위논문. 부산대학교. Ha. M. (2013). A study of development of problems for descriptive evaluation using symbolic graphing calculator TI-92. Master's thesis, Pusan National University.
- 홍예윤 (2011). 대학수학능력시험에서 그래픽 계산기 도입에 관한 고찰: 뉴질랜드 사례를 중심으로. 교사교육연구, 50(3), 105-118. Hong, Y. Y.(2011). Grapic calculator and university entrance examination: the case in New Zealand. Teacher Education Research, 50(3), 105-118.
- 홍예윤, 고상숙 (2012). 그래핑 계산기를 활용한 평가방안: 미적분관련 문제를 중심으로. 교과교육학연구, 16(4). 1045-1069. Hong. Y. Y. & Cho-Koh, S. S.(2012). Some ideas about mathematical assessment using a graphing calculator: problems with differential & integral calculus. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(4). 1045-1069.
- Adams, T.L. (1997). Technology makes a difference in community college mathematics teaching, Community College Journal of Research and Practice 21(5), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/1066892970210502
- Anderson, M., Bloom, L., Mueller, U., & Pedler, P. (1999). The impact of the graphics calculator on the assessment of calculus and modeling, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 30(4), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073999287770
- Borwein, J.M. (2005). The experimental mathematician: the pleasure of discovery and the role of proof. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 10(2), 75-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-005-5216-x
- Bradley, J. (1995). Technology and assessment - An international experience, Paper presented at the 5th Annual Australian Bridging Mathematics Network Conference, Batchelor, NT.
- Bradley, J., Kissane, B., & Kemp, M. (1996). Graphics calculators in the mathematics curriculum : Integration or differentiation? In J. Abbott & L. Wilcoxson (Eds.), Teaching and learning within and across disciplines: Teaching and Learning Forum (21-26). Academic Services Unit, Murdoch University.
- Cavanagh, M. (2005). Working mathematically: The role of graphics calculators. In M. Coupland, J. Anderson, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Making mathematics vital: Proceedings of the 20th biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (80-86). Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
- Collins, A. and Bielaczyc, K. (1997) Dreams of technology-supported learning communities, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, Taiwan.
- Forster, P.A. & Mueller, U. (2002). Assessment in calculus in the presence of graphing calculators. Mathematics Education Research Journal 14(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217114
- Harvey, J.G. (1992). Mathematics testing with calculators: Ransoming the hostages. In T.A.Romberg (Ed.), Mathematics assessment and evaluation: Imperatives for mathematics educators (149-174). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Kemp, M., Kissane, B., & Bradley, J. (1996). Graphics calculator use in examinations: accident or design? Australian Senior Mathematics Journal 10(1), 33-50.
- Kissane, B., Kemp, M. and Bradley, J. (1996) Graphics calculators and assessment. In: 8th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Spain.
- Kissane, B., Kemp, M., & Bradley, J. (1995). Student reactions to the use of graphics calculators. In S. Flavel & I. Isaacs (Eds.). Proceedings of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia 18th Annual Conference (235-241). Darwin, NT.
- National Academy of Science (1993). Measuring What counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Position Statement: Calculators and the Education of Youth. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1999). Mathematics Assessment: A Practical Handbook for Grades 9-12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000a). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000b). Mathematics Assessment: A Practical Handbook for Grades 6-8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Malone, J.A., Douglas, G.A., Kissane, B.V., & Mortlock, R.S. (1980). Measuring problem-solving ability. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics. 1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (204-215). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Senk, S.L., Beckmann, C.E., & Thompson, D.R. (1997). Assessment and grading in high school mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(2), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.2307/749761
- Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' commans process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9(3), 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5