한국수자원학회논문집 (Journal of Korea Water Resources Association)

  • 제47권5호
  • /
  • Pages.459-468
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2799-8746(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-8754(eISSN)
한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

45° 상향수제의 적정 간격 제시를 위한 흐름특성 실험 연구

An Experimental Study on Flow Characteristics for Optimal Spacing Suggestion of 45° Upward Groynes

  • 김성중 (한국건설기술연구원 하천해안연구실) ;
  • 강준구 (한국건설기술연구원 하천해안연구실) ;
  • 여홍구 (한국건설기술연구원 하천해안연구실)
  • 투고 : 2014.03.20
  • 심사 : 2014.04.16
  • 발행 : 2014.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

수제는 일반적으로 하천에서의 흐름 방향과 유속을 제어하여 하안 또는 제방을 유수에 의한 침식작용으로부터 보호하기 위한 목적으로 설치될 뿐만 아니라 운하의 운영을 위한 충분한 수심 확보 목적으로도 이용된다. 특히 하천복원 및 자연하천 정비에 대한 관심이 커지면서 수제는 국부적인 흐름제어와 수중서식처 조성을 위한 주요 수공구조물로 제시되고 있다. 수제는 단일구조물로 설치되는 경우보다는 군수제의 형태로 설치되어 지는데 군수제의 경우 설치간격에 따라 수제역내 흐름이 다양하게 변화하기 때문에 수제간격은 군수제 설계에 있어서 가장 중요한 설계인자라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 설치간격에 따라 다양하게 변화되는 수제주변 및 수제역내 흐름에 대한 검토를 통해 상향수제를 대상으로 수제설치에 따른 적절한 간격을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 주흐름영역과 재순환영역으로 구분하여 수제주변에서 발생하는 흐름을 대상으로 검토하였다. 주흐름영역은 통수능 저감으로 인해 증가된 유속이 하상안정성에 영향을 미치는 인자로 설치간격에 따른 최대유속의 변화에 대하여 검토하였다. 수제역내 재순환흐름은 수제역내 세굴 및 퇴적에 영향을 미치는 요소로서 수제역내 흐름 및 제방의 안정성에 문제를 야기시킬 수 있다. 재순환영역은 회전류의 규모와 제방부 안정성에 영향을 미치는 제방주변에서의 흐름에 대하여 분석하였으며, 수제역내 발생하는 회전류의 중심점 위치변화에 대한 비교검토를 수행하였다. 결과를 종합적으로 검토한 결과 상향수제설치에 따른 유속저감, 하상안정성확보, 수제역내역류로 인한 제방안정성 확보 등을 고려하였을 때 적절한 설치간격은 최소 4배에서 최대 6배 이내로 설치할 것을 제안하고자 한다.

Groyne to control the direction and velocity of flow in rivers is generally installed for the purpose of protecting riverbanks or embankments from erosion caused by running water. In particular, as interest in river restoration and natural river improvement increases, groynes are proposed as a key hydraulic structure for local flow control and riparian habitat establishment. Groynes are installed mainly in groups rather than as individual structures. In case of groynes installed as a group, flow around the groynes change according to spacing in between the groynes. Therefore, groyne spacing is regarded as the most important factor in groyne design. This study aimed at examining changes of flows around and within the area of groynes that take place according to the spacing of groynes installed in order to propose the optimal spacing for upward groynes. To examine flow characteristics around groynes, this study looked at flows in main flow area and recirculation flow area separately. In main flow area, it examined the impact of flow velocity increasing as a result of conveyance reduction that is exerted on river bed stability in relation to changes in the maximum flow velocity according to installation spacing. As a factor causing impacts on scouring and sedimentation within the area of groynes, recirculation flow in the groyne area can lead problems concerning flow within the area and stability of embankment. As for recirculation area, an analysis was conducted on the scale of rotational flow and the flow around embankment that exerts impacts on stability of the embankment. In addition, a comparative analysis was carried with reference to changes of the central point of rotational flow that occur within the area of groynes. As a result of compositely examining the results, the appropriate installation spacing is proposed as min. four times-max. six times considering a decrease in flow velocity according to the installation of upward groynes, river bed stability and stability of embankments against counterflow within the area of groynes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Acheson, A.R. (1968). River Control and Drainage in New Zealand. Ministry of Works, New Zealand.
  2. Ahmad, M. (1953). "Experiments on the Design and Behavior of Spur Dikes." Proceedings, Minnesota International Hydraulics Convention ASCE, NewYork, pp. 145-159.
  3. Copeland, R.R. (1983). "Bank Protection Techniques Using Spur Dikes." Miscellaneous paper HL83-1, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. pp. 7-8.
  4. Ettema, R., and Muste, M. (2004). "Scale Effect in Flume Experiments on Flow Around a Spur Dike in Flatbed Channel." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 7, pp. 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:7(635)
  5. FHWA(1985). Design of Spur-type Streambank Stabilization Structures. U.S. DOT, FHWA, Rep. No. FHWA/RD 84/101, McLean, VA. pp. 60-72.
  6. HR Wallingford. (1997). Guidelines on the geometry of groynes for river training. HR Wallingford, Report SR493, October. pp. 1, pp. 9-10.
  7. Kang, J.G., Yeo, H.K., and Kim, S.J. (2005). "An Experimental Study on Tip Velocity and Downstream Recirculation Zone of Single Groyne Conditions." Korea Water Resources Association, Vol 38, No. 2, pp. 143-153 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2005.38.2.143
  8. Kang, J.G., Yeo, H.K., and Roh, Y.S. (2006). "An Experimental Study on Characteristics of Flow around Groynes for Groyne Spacing." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, Vol 26, No. 3B, pp. 271-278.
  9. KICT. (2009). River Structure Design Techniques for Harmonizing Nature with the Human. Report No. 2009-066, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, pp. 85-94.
  10. KICT. (2011). River Structure Design Techniques for Harmonizing Nature with the Human. Report No. 2011-090, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, pp. 30-47.
  11. Richardson, E.V., and Simons, D.B. (1974). Spurs and Guide Banks. Open File Report, Colorado State University Engineering Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, February.

피인용 문헌

  1. Flume experiments for turbulent flow around a spur dike vol.49, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.8.707
  2. Changes in Channel Geomorphology and Hydraulics by Submerged Spur Dikes at a Channelized Stream vol.2, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2015.2.1.042