DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Value of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome : Correlation with Electrophysiological Abnormalities and Clinical Severity

  • Kim, Min-Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Hong-Jun (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Se-Hyuck (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dong-Sik (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Nam, Hee-Seung (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2013.06.22
  • 심사 : 2014.01.15
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28

초록

Objective : To investigate a diagnostic value of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients and to evaluate a correlation of sonographic measurements with the degree of electrodiagnostic abnormalities and clinical severity. Methods : Two-hundred-forty-six symptomatic hands in 135 patients and 30 asymptomatic hands in 19 healthy individuals as control group were included. In ultrasonographic study, we measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) and flattening ratio (FR) of the median nerve at the pisiform as well as palmar bowing (PB) of the flexor retinaculum. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic measurements were evaluated and ultrasonographic data from the symptomatic and control hands were compared to the grade of electrodiagnostic and clinical severity. Results : The mean CSA was $13.7{\pm}4.2mm^2$ in symptomatic hands and $7.9{\pm}1.3mm^2$ in asymptomatic hands. The mean FR was $4.2{\pm}1.0$ in symptomatic hands and $3.4{\pm}0.4$ in asymptomatic hands. The mean PB was $3.5{\pm}0.5$ mm in symptomatic hands and $2.6{\pm}0.3$ mm in asymptomatic hands. Statistical analysis showed differences of the mean CSA, FR and PB between groups were significant. A cut-off value of $10mm^2$ for the mean CSA was found to be the upper limit for normal value. Both the mean CSA and PB are correlated with the grade of electrophysiological abnormalities and clinical severity, respectively. Conclusion : Ultrasographic measurement of the CSA and PB is helpful to diagnose CTS as a non-invasive and an alternative modality for the evaluation of CTS. In addition, ultrasonography also provides a reliable correlation with the grade of electrodiagnostic abnormalities and clinical severity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn SY, Hong YH, Koh YH, Chung YS, Lee SH, Yang HJ : Pressure measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome : correlation with electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic findings. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46 : 199-204, 2009 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.46.3.199
  2. Altinok T, Baysal O, Karakas HM, Sigirci A, Alkan A, Kayhan A : Ultrasonographic assessment of mild and moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 59 : 916-925, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.019
  3. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Acadgraphicemy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation : Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome : summary statement. Muscle Nerve 25 : 918-922, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10185
  4. Beekman R, Visser LH : Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve 27 : 26-33, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10227
  5. Buchberger W, Schön G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W : High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med 10 : 531-537, 1991 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.10.531
  6. Deniz FE, Oksüz E, Sarikaya B, Kurt S, Erkorkmaz U, Ulusoy H, et al. : Comparison of the diagnostic utility of electromyography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome determined by clinical findings. Neurosurgery 70 : 610-616, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318233868f
  7. Duncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F : Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 : 681-684, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470903
  8. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S : Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome : substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 43 : 887-895, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh190
  9. Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M, Padua R, Gregori B, D'Amico P, et al. : A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome : validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 113 : 71-77, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00704-0
  10. Grundberg AB : Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography. J Hand Surg Am 8 : 348-349, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(83)80179-8
  11. Hammer HB, Hovden IA, Haavardsholm EA, Kvien TK : Ultrasonography shows increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45 : 584-588, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei218
  12. Iyer VG : Understanding nerve conduction and electromyographic studies. Hand Clin 9 : 273-287, 1993
  13. Karadağ YS, Karadağ O, Ciçekli E, Oztürk S, Kiraz S, Ozbakir S, et al. : Severity of Carpal tunnel syndrome assessed with high frequency ultrasonography. Rheumatol Int 30 : 761-765, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1061-x
  14. Keles I, Karagulle Kendi AT, Aydin G, Zog SG, Orkun S : Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84 : 443-450, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000163715.11645.96
  15. Koyuncuoglu HR, Kutluhan S, Yesildag A, Oyar O, Guler K, Ozden A : The value of ultrasonographic measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with negative electrodiagnostic tests. Eur J Radiol 56 : 365-369, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.05.013
  16. Lee CH, Kim TK, Yoon ES, Dhong ES : Correlation of high-resolution ultrasonographic findings with the clinical symptoms and electrodiagnostic data in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 54 : 20-23, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000141942.27182.55
  17. Lee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, Ganos DL, Ditmars DM, Darian VB : Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am 37 : 859-872, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70132-9
  18. Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Meadows KD, Lockwood RS : Predictive value of nerve conduction measurements at the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve 16 : 1377-1382, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880161217
  19. Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P : Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 96 : 211-217, 1997
  20. Padua L, Pazzaglia C, Caliandro P, Granata G, Foschini M, Briani C, et al. : Carpal tunnel syndrome : ultrasound, neurophysiology, clinical and patient-oriented assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 119 : 2064-2069, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.05.004
  21. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 43 : 2406-2409, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.43.11.2406
  22. Sarría L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martínez-Berganza T, García S : Carpal tunnel syndrome : usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol 10 : 1920-1925, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000502
  23. Stevens JC : AAEM minimonograph #26 : the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Muscle Nerve 20 : 1477-1486, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199712)20:12<1477::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-5
  24. Stewart JD, Eisen A : Tinel's sign and the carpal tunnel syndrome. Br Med J 2 : 1125-1126, 1978
  25. Tai TW, Wu CY, Su FC, Chern TC, Jou IM : Ultrasonography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome : a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Ultrasound Med Biol 38 : 1121-1128, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.026
  26. Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Smith BP, Rushing J, Walker FO : The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 31 : 726-732, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.020
  27. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS : Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 46 : 1914-1921, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10385
  28. Yesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N, Koyuncuoglu HR, Oyar O, Guler K, et al. : The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 59 : 910-915, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.020
  29. Ziswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vogelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Jüni P : Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome : a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52 : 304-311, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20723

피인용 문헌

  1. Does the ratio of the carpal tunnel inlet and outlet cross-sectional areas in the median nerve reflect carpal tunnel syndrome severity? vol.10, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.160117
  2. Carpal tunnel syndrome severity staging using sonographic and clinical measures vol.51, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24478
  3. Review of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and a Proposed Scanning Protocol vol.35, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.12014
  4. Electrosonodiagnosis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm Based on an Analytic Literature Review vol.8, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.11.016
  5. Comparison of Inching Electrodiagnosis Method and Ultrasonographic Findings in the Determination of Median Nerve Entrapment Site in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vol.96, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000000762
  6. Sonographic Findings of the Bifid Median Nerve and Persistent Median Artery in Carpal Tunnel: A Preliminary Study in Chinese Individuals vol.72, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(06)05
  7. Usefulness of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome vol.45, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_22_17
  8. Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Sonographic Median Nerve and Wrist Measurements vol.26, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_2_17
  9. Investigation of the Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography for Radial Neuropathy Located at the Spiral Groove vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.601
  10. Carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with and without diabetes mellitus in Upper Egypt: The impact of electrophysiological and ultrasonographical studies vol.54, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.11.003
  11. CORRELATION OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME vol.7, pp.51, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2018/1196
  12. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.98, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000001104
  13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Parameters in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Additional Criteria for Diagnosis vol.38, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15012
  14. Role of High Resolution Ultrasound in Assessment of Abnormalities of Median Nerve in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2020.102007
  15. Ultrasound parameters to identify and diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. A review of the literature vol.23, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12219
  16. Prevalence of the persistent median artery in patients undergoing surgical open carpal tunnel release: A case series vol.23, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2021.100113
  17. Machine learning-based approach for disease severity classification of carpal tunnel syndrome vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97043-7
  18. Assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome via ultrasonography among hospital workers: a screening study vol.57, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-021-00385-2