한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.171-181
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국의 REDD+ 프로그램 이행 적지 분석 및 활성화 방안 연구

A Study on Analysis of the Suitable Sites to Implement REDD+ Program and Plan of Activation in South Korea

  • 박홍철 (동국대학교 대학원 바이오환경과학과) ;
  • 오충현 (동국대학교 바이오환경과학과)
  • Park, Hong Chul (Graduate School, Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science) ;
  • Oh, Choong Hyeon (Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2013.12.12
  • 심사 : 2014.03.19
  • 발행 : 2014.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국의 16개 시 도 지역을 대상으로 산림전용 및 산림황폐화 방지를 위한 REDD+ 프로그램 이행 적지를 도출하고, REDD+ 프로그램 활성화 방안을 모색하는 것에 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 Forest Carbon Index 개념을 활용하여 비용 대비 잠재이익, 거래 가능한 탄소배출권 발행량 등을 산출하였다. 분석결과 16개 시 도 지역 중 경기도, 인천광역시, 서울특별시, 대구광역시, 강원도가 5위 안에 포함되었다. 최적지로 도출된 경기도의 경우, 현재까지의 산림전용 감축면적이 높아 탄소배출 감축량이 16개 대상지 중 가장 높게 나타났다. 또한 프로그램 이행에 따른 잠재 이익도 높은 편에 속하였다. 나아가 적지분석 결과를 토대로 한국 내 REDD+ 프로그램의 활성화를 위한 방안 4가지를 제안하였다.

This study was performed to prevent deforestation and forest degradation and vitalize REDD+ program through suitable site analysis at the 16 districts of South Korea. For this, we worked out profit potential, opportunity cost, carbon credits through making it use of conception of the Forest Carbon Index. As a results, Gyeonggi-do, Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Daegu Metropolitan City, Gwangwon-do included in the top 5 among the 16 districts of South Korea. In case of Gyeonggi-do as best suitable site, reduction of carbon emission was best high due to reduction area of deforestation. And profit potential was also high in accordance with practice of REDD+ program. Furthermore, we proposed four plans to activate REDD+ program in South Korea on the basis of the results.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, J.S. and K.K. Bae(2009) Assessment of the potential carbon credits from reducing emissions from deforestation and enhancement of forest carbon stock activities in developing countries. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 98(3): 263-271. (in Korean with English abstract)
  2. Bellassen, V. and V. Gitz(2008) Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation in Cameroon-assessing costs and benefits. Ecological Economics 68(1-2): 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.015
  3. CCFM(2009) A Framework for Forest Management Offset Protocols. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, 142pp.
  4. Cha, J.H., J.H. Lee, K.J. Han, J.S. Bae, M.H. Seol and R.W. Joo(2012) Research on the solution of non-permanence problem of forest carbon offset project focused on the introduction of buffer system. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 101(1): 83-90. (in Korean with English abstract)
  5. da Fonseca, G.A.B., CM. Rodriguez, G. Midgley, J. Busch, L. Hannah and R.A. Mittermeier(2007) No forest left behind. PLoS Biol. 5(8): pp. 1645-1646.
  6. Deveny, A., J. Nackoney and N. Purvis(2009) Forest Carbon Index. Climate Advisers and Resources for the Future. Washington, 80pp.
  7. Ebeling, J. and A. Vallejo(2011) Building Forest Carbon Projects - Step-by-step Overview and Guide. DC: Forest Trends, 67pp.
  8. Ebeling, J. and M. Yasue.(2008) Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Science 363(1498): 1917-1924. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0029
  9. Global Canopy Programme, Amazon Environmental Research Institute, Fauna and Flora International, and UNEP Finance Initiative(2014) Stimulating Interim Demand for REDD+ Emission Reductions: The Need for a Strategic Intervention from 2015 to 2020. A Report of the Interim Forest Finance(IFF) Project, Rep. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford UK, 48pp.
  10. Griscom, B., D. Shoch, B. Stanley, R. Cortez and N. Virgilio(2009) Implication of REDD+ Baseline Methods for Different Country Circumstances during an Initial Performance Period. The Nature Conservancy, 35pp.
  11. Harris, N.L., S. Petrova, F. Stolle and S. Brown(2008) Identifying Optimal Areas for REDD+ Intervention: East Kalimantan, Indonesia as a Case Study. Environmental Research Letters 3(3): 035006, 11pp.
  12. IPCC(2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996pp.
  13. Kim, Y.K.(2013) A Study on the Application of Tiered-approach to Integrate Biodiversity Safeguards into REDD++ Design and Implementation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, 226pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  14. Kindermann, G., M. Obersteiner, B. Sohngen, J. Sathaye, K. Andrasko, E. Rametsteiner, B. Schlamadinger, S. Wunder and R. Beach(2008) Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(30): 10302-10307. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710616105
  15. Kong, W.S.(2005) Environment and ecosystem of North Korean mountain. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Korean Geographical Society, pp. 53-55. (in Korean)
  16. Korea Forest Service(2009) Climate Change and Forest. Korea Forest Service, pp. 87-98. (in Korean)
  17. Korea Forest Service(2011) The Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2011. Korea Forest Service, pp. 166-167. (in Korean)
  18. KREI(2010) Understanding of the UNFCCC REDD+ Mechanism and Prospect of REDD+ Negotiations. Korea Rural Economic Institute, 111pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Park, H.C. and C.H. Oh(2012) A study of baseline approach for implementing program of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 26(4): 484-497. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Park, K.S., S.Y. Lee and S.Y. Park(2011) A study on the basic directions for forest rehabilitation programs considering to economic and social conditions of North Korea. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 100(3): 423-431. (in Korean with English abstract)
  21. Peck, K.Y.(2010) Thoughts for REDD+ moving forward. Symposium on the Out-look if REDD+ and Strategy by Countries at University of Chungnam, KGPA, Korea, December 16, pp. 8-13. (in Korean)
  22. REDD+SES(2012) REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards Version 2. Rep. Redd-standard, Washington DC, USA, 27pp.
  23. Stern, N.(2006) Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 662pp.
  24. UNEP and UNCBD(2011) REDD-plus and Biodiversity. Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity, 68pp.
  25. UNFCCC(2006) Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Potential Policy Approaches and Positive Incentives. Submission to the UNFCCC/SBSTA, UNFCCC/SBSTA/2006/L.25 ; Joint Submission by Joanneum Research, Union of Concerned Scientists, Woods Hole Research Center, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazonia, 20pp.
  26. UNFCCC (2013) FCCC/CP/2013/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Nineteenth Session, Held at Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013.
  27. White, D. and P. Minang(2011) Estimating the Opportunity Costs of REDD+. World Bank Institute. Washington, 262pp.