DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relative Analysis between Fertility and Protein Changes in Semen of Different Species in Pigs

돼지 품종간 정액 내에서 수정 능력과 단백질 변화와의 관계 분석

  • Lee, Yeon-Ju (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hee (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Jin (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Cheong, Hee-Tae (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yang, Boo-Keun (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Choon-Keun (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 이연주 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 이상희 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김유진 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 정희태 (강원대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 양부근 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 박춘근 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2014.03.07
  • Accepted : 2014.03.14
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between fertility and protein pattern change using in vitro fertilization, analysis of sperm characteristics and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in different pig types. In results, the viability and mitochondria integrity of sperm were higher significantly (p<0.05) but the portions of acrosome reaction was lower significantly (p<0.05) in Duroc and $F_1$ (potbellied ${\times}$ PWG miniature pig) than PWG miniature. On in vitro fertilization to investigate fertility, the fertility of $F_1$ semen war higher significantly (p<0.05) than in Duroc and PWG miniature pig. On the other hand, protein patterns showed similar function among the different boar semen. Especially, the heat shock 70 kDa 1-like and G patch domain-containing protein 4 were significantly (p<0.05) higher expressed in $F_1$ than in Duroc and PWG miniature pig. The proteins associated with mitochondria in Duroc were significantly (p<0.05) higher expressed than in $F_1$ and PWG miniature pig. The developmental rates to blastocyst stage of oocytes fertilized with sperm of $F_1$ pig were significantly (p<0.05) higher than in PWG miniature pig. However, phosphoglycerate kinase 2 and zinc finger protein 431 were significantly (p<0.05) higher expressed in PWG miniature pig than in $F_1$ and Duroc pigs. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that different proteins were expressed in different pig types, and were associated with a sperm functions and embryo development.

Keywords

References

  1. Almlid T, Johnson LA (1988): Effects of glycerol concentration, equilibration time and temperature of glycerol addition on post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in straws. J Anim Sci 66(11):2899-2905. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.66112899x
  2. Aoki VW, Emery BR, Liu L, Carrell DT (2006): Protamine levels vary between individual sperm cells of infertile human males and correlate with viability and DNA integrity. J Androl 27(6):890-898. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.106.000703
  3. Bach H, Papavinasasundaram KG, Wong D, Hmama Z, Av-Gay Y (2008): Mycobacterium tuberculosis Virulence Is Mediated by PtpA Dephosphorylation of human vacuolar protein sorting 33B. Cell Host Microbe 3(5):316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.008
  4. Baker MA, Hetherington L, Reeves G, Müller J, Aitken RJ (2008): The rat sperm proteome characterized via IPG strip prefractionation and LC‐MS/ MS identification. J Proteomics 8(11):2312-2321. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700876
  5. Baumans V, Bernoth EM, Bromage N, Bunyan J, Erhardt W, Flecknell P, Gregory N, Hackbarth H, Morton D, Warwick MC (1997): Recommendations for euthanasia of experimental animals: Part 2. Lab. Anim. 31(1):1-32. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367797780600297
  6. Bohring C, Krause W (2003): Immune infertility: towards a better understanding of sperm (auto)‐ immunity The value of proteomic analysis. Hum Reprod 18(5):915-924. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg207
  7. Cao W, Gerton GL, Moss SB (2006): Proteomic profiling of accessory structures from the mouse sperm flagellum. Mol Cell Proteomics 5(5):801-810. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500322-MCP200
  8. Choi MS, Shim MR, Oh MY, Kim KW, Lee HC, Yang BC, Chung HK, Kim JH, Lee HT, Hwang IS (2012): Proteins associated with reproductive disorders in testes of human erythropoietin gene- harboring transgenic boars. Theriogenology 78(5):1020-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.013
  9. Correa J, Pace M, Zavos P (1997): Relationships among frozen-thawed sperm characteristics assessed via the routine semen analysis, sperm functional tests and fertility of bulls in an artificial insemination program. Theriogenology 48(5):721-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00296-3
  10. Evenson D, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed M (1980): Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 210(4474):1131-1133. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444440
  11. Garner D, Johnson L, Yue S, Roth B, Haugland R (1994): Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR‐14 and propidium iodide. J Androl 15(6):620-629.
  12. Hirai M, Boersma A, Hoeflich A, Wolf E, Foll J, Aumuller R, Braun J (2001): Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl 22(1):104-110.
  13. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng JK, Bumgarner R, Goodlett DR, Aebersold R, Hood L (2001): Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292(5518):929-934. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5518.929
  14. Jones A, Gillan L (1996): Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase of boar spermatozoa: inhibition by α- bromohydrin phosphate. J Reprod Fertil 108(1):95-100. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1080095
  15. Killian G, Chapman DA, Rogowski L (1993): Fertility- associated proteins in Holstein bull seminal plasma. Biol Reprod 49(6):1202-1207. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.6.1202
  16. Kiso WK, Selvaraj V, Nagashima J, Asano A, Brown JL, Schmitt DL, Leszyk J, Travis AJ, Pukazhenthi BS (2013): Lactotransferrin in Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) seminal plasma correlates with semen quality. PLoS ONE 8(8):e71033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071033
  17. Knox R, Tudor K, Rodriguez-Zas S, Robb J (2000): Effect of subcutaneous vs intramuscular administration of PG 600 on estrual and ovulatory responses of prepubertal gilts. J Anim Sci 78(7): 1732-1737. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7871732x
  18. Knox R, Rodriguez-Zas S, Miller G, Willenburg K, Robb J (2001): Administration of pg 600 to sows at weaning and the time of ovulation as determined by transrectal ultrasound. J Anim Sci 79(4):796-802. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.794796x
  19. Lucas X, Martı́nez E, Roca J, Vazquez J, Gil M, Pastor L, Alabart J (2003): Influence of follicle size on the penetrability of immature pig oocytes for homologous in vitro penetration assay. Theriogenology 60(4):659-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00077-3
  20. Magistrini M, Guitton E, Levern Y, Nicolle JC, Vidament M, Kerboeuf D, Palmer E (1997): New staining methods for sperm evaluation estimated by microscopy and flow cytometry. Theriogenology 48 (7):1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00355-5
  21. Martinez‐Heredia J, Estanyol JM, Ballesca JL, Oliva R (2006): Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. J Proteomics 6(15):4356-4369. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600094
  22. Maxwell W, Johnson L (1997): Membrane status of boar spermatozoa after cooling or cryopreservation. Theriogenology 48(2):209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)84068-X
  23. Nagy S, Jansen J, Topper EK, Gadella BM (2003): A triple-stain flow cytometric method to assess plasma- and acrosome-membrane integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm immediately after thawing in presence of egg-yolk particles. Biol Reprod 68(5): 1828-1835. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.011445
  24. Papaioannou K, Murphy R, Monks R, Hynes N, Ryan M, Boland M, Roche J (1997): Assessment of viability and mitochondrial function of equine spermatozoa using double staining and flow cytometry. Theriogenology 48(2):299-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)84077-0
  25. Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, Thomas Jr AJ, Agarwal A (2000): Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics, and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 73(3):459-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00567-1
  26. Peddinti D, Nanduri B, Kaya A, Feugang JM, Burgess SC, Memili E (2008): Comprehensive proteomic analysis of bovine spermatozoa of varying fertility rates and identification of biomarkers associated with fertility. BMC Syst Biol 2(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-2-19
  27. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM, Mills GB, Simone C, Fishman DA, Kohn EC (2002): Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. J-Lancet 359(9306):572-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07746-2
  28. Pieler T, Bellefroid E (1994): Perspectives on zinc finger protein function and evolution-an update. Mol Biol Rep 20(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999848
  29. Pixton KL, Deeks ED, Flesch FM, Moseley FL, Bjorndahl L, Ashton PR, Barratt CL, Brewis IA (2004): Sperm proteome mapping of a patient who experienced failed fertilization at IVF reveals altered expression of at least 20 proteins compared with fertile donors: case report. Hum Reprod 19(6):1438-1447. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh224
  30. Sawyer GM, Monzingo AF, Poteet EC, O'Brien DA, Robertus JD (2008): X‐ray analysis of phosphoglycerate kinase 2, a sperm‐specific isoform from Mus musculus. Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf 71(3):1134-1144.
  31. Silva P, Gadella B (2006): Detection of damage in mammalian sperm cells. Theriogenology 65(5):958-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.010
  32. Tagaya H, Fukasawa H, Shoda T, Hoshi K, Hirata S (2009): Novel alpha-fetoprotein-V messenger RNA isoforms in humans. Reprod Sci 16(8):794-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719109336617
  33. Tejada R, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik J, Friedman S (1984): A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 42(1):87-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47963-X
  34. Van Gestel R, Brewis I, Ashton P, Helms J, Brouwers J, Gadella B (2005): Capacitation-dependent concentration of lipid rafts in the apical ridge head area of porcine sperm cells. Mol Hum Reprod 11 (8):583-590. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah200
  35. Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Yates JR (2003): A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Nat Biotechnol 21(5): 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt819
  36. Zhang X, Tee YH, Heng JK, Zhu Y, Hu X, Margadant F, Ballestrem C, Bershadsky A, Griffiths G, Yu H (2010): Kinectin-mediated endoplasmic reticulum dynamics supports focal adhesion growth in the cellular lamella. J Cell Sci 123(22):3901-3912. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.069153
  37. Zhao C, Huo R, Wang FQ, Lin M, Zhou ZM, Sha JH (2007): Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril 87(2):436-438. (Received: 7 March 2014/ Accepted: 14 March 2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.057