DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of In-vitro Fertility and Matrix Metalloproteinases Activation of Spermatozoa by Supplement of Tea-N-Tris to Sperm Cryopreservation of Miniature Pig

미니돼지 정자 동결 보존에 Tea-N-Tris의 첨가가 체외 수정 및 MMPs 활성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Sang-Hwan (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyun-Ah (Major in Animal Fusion Biotechnology, Graduate School of Bio & Information Technology, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Park, Yong-Su (Jangsu Endangered Species Restoration Team) ;
  • Yoon, Jong-Taek (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Hankyong National University)
  • 김상환 (한경대학교 유전공학연구소) ;
  • 강현아 (한경대학교 미래융합기술대학원 동물바이오융합전공) ;
  • 박용수 (장수군청 환경위생과 생태복원팀) ;
  • 윤종택 (한경대학교 유전공학연구소)
  • Received : 2014.03.12
  • Accepted : 2014.03.26
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of adding Tea-N-Tris (TES) to the freezing buffer for miniature pig sperm. In particular, we attempted to identify the association between the MMPs expression and the fertility and viability of frozen sperm from each extender (LEY (Lactose Egg-Yolk), TLE (TES + LEY), TFGE (TES + Fructose + Glucose Egg-Yolk)). In accordance with this, Hypoosmotic Swelling Test (HOST) respond test was the lowest among sperms frozen in LEY while the highest HOST respond was observed among sperms frozen in TLE. Furthermore, we observed MMPs expression in all sperm groups, with pro-MMP showing lower expression than active MMPs. The expression of MMP-9 and MMP-2 was the highest in sperms frozen in LEY, Meanwhile, sperms from the TFGE and TLE group showed lower level of MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression in the order of TLE being the lowest. LEY group showed lower rate of blastocyst development than the TES supplement group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Meanwhile the rate of blastocyst development appeared similar when sperms from TLE and TFGE group were used for IVF. Together, these results indicate that adding Tea-N-Tris to the sperm freezing buffer only suppresses MMPs protein activation but also maximize in-vitro fertility, providing a means to improve the success rate in the in vitro manipulation of miniature pig sperm.

Keywords

References

  1. Arriola J. 1982. Interaction of formaldehyde and of sodium and triethanolamine lauryl sulfate on the motility and fertilizing ability of rabbit and bull spermatozoa frozen in egg yolk and milk extenders. Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
  2. Carreau S. 2001. Germ cells; a new source of estrogens in the male gonad. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 178: 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00411-7
  3. Cerolini S, Maldjian A, Pizzi F and Gliozzi TM. 2001. Changes in sperm quality and lipid composition during cryopreservation of boar semen. Reproduction 121: 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210395
  4. Chesneau V, Prat A, Segretain D, Hospital V, Dupaix A, Foulon T, Jegou B and Cohen P. 1996. NRD convertase: a putative processing endoprotease associated with the axoneme and the manchette in late spermatids. J. Cell Sci. 109(11): 2737-2745.
  5. Choi WC, Yang MH, Lee YS, Cheong HT, Yang BK, Lee DS and Park CK. 2007. Effect of thawing temperature on sperm characteristics of frozen semen in miniature pig. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 31(3): 175-179.
  6. Diaz-Perez E and Meizel S. 1992. Importance of mammalian sperm metalloendo metalloendoprotease activity during the acrosome reaction to subsequent sperm-egg fusion: inhibitor studies with human sperm and zona-free hamster eggs. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 31: 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080310206
  7. Diaz-Perez E, Thomas P and Meizel S. 1988. Evidence suggesting a role for human sperm metalloendoprotease activity in penetrating of zona-free hamster eggs by human sperm. J. Exp. Zool. 248: 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402480213
  8. Garde JJ, Soler AJ, Cassinello J, Crespo C, Malo AF, Espeso, Gomendio GM, and Roldan ERS. 2003. Sperm cryopreservation in three species of endangered gazelles. Biol. Reprod. 69: 602-611. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.012914
  9. Haley CS and Lee GJ. 1980. Genetic basis of prolificacy in meishan pigs. J. Reprod. Fertil. 48: 247-259.
  10. Huarte J, Belin D, Bosco D, Sappino AP and Vassalli JD. 1987. Plasminogen activator and mouse spermatozoa: urokinase synthesis in the male genital tract and binding of the enzyme to the sperm cell surface. J. Cell Biol. 104: 1281-1289. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.104.5.1281
  11. Jeyendran RS, Vander HH, Pelaez MP, Crabo BG and Zaneveld LJD. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J. Reprod. Fert. 70: 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219
  12. Jin W, Arai KY, Herath CB, Kondo M, Ishi H, Tanioka Y, Watanabe G, Groome NP and Tayat K. 2001. Inhibins in the male Gottingen miniature pig: Leydig cell are the predominant source of inhibin. B. J. Androl. 22: 953-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb03435.x
  13. Kim SH, Kang HA, Lee MS, Seo KS and Yoon JT. 2012. Effect of TES extender on sperm characteristocs and viability of frozen semen in miniature pig. J. Emb. Trans. 27(1): 40-50.
  14. Kim SH, Song YS, Hwang SY, Min KS and Yoon JT. 2013. Effects of hormones on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in bovine spermatozoa. Asian- Australas J. Anim. Sci. 26(3): 334-342. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12564
  15. Lee SH, Yoo HJ, Lee YS, Cheong HT, Yang BK, Kim DY and Park CK. 2011. Effects of cryo-extenders for spermatozoa sorted by percoll on in vitro fertility of in miniature pigs. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 35(1): 85-91.
  16. Longin J, Guillaumot P, Chauvin MA, Morera AM and Le Magueresse-Battistoni B. 2001. MT1-MMP in rat testicular development and the control of Sertoli cell proMMP-2 activation. J. Cell Sci. 114: 2125-2134.
  17. Longin J and Le Magueresse-Battistoni B. 2002. Evidence that MMP-2 and TIMP-2 are at play in the FSH-induced changes in Sertoli cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 189: 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00756-0
  18. Maxwell WMC and Johnsom LA. 1997. Membrane status of boar spermatozoa after cooling or cryopreservation. Theriogenology 48: 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)84068-X
  19. Mazur P. 1984. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 16: C125-C142.
  20. Orit BS, Zaki K, Yael G and Shlomit G. 2002. Presence of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase in human sperm. J. Androl. 23(5): 702-708.
  21. Phelps BM, Koppel DE, Primakoff P and Myles DG. 1990. Evidence that proteolysis of the surface is an initial step in the mechanism of formation of sperm cell surface domains. J. Cell Biol. 111: 1839-1847. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.111.5.1839
  22. Polge C, Salamon S and Wilmut I. 1973. Fertilization capacity or frozen boar semen following surgical insemination. Vet Res. 87: 424-428.
  23. Salisbury GW, Van Demark N and Lodge JR. 1978. Physiology of Reproduction and Artification Insemination of Cattle. W. H. Freeman and Co. 2nd (eds), San Francisco, USA.
  24. Shim KS, Kim KS, Seo KD and Song HB. 2005. Studies on the freezing of boar semen I. Effects of cooling rate and extenders on viabiliaty and normal acrosome after frozenthawed of boar semen. Emb. Trans. 20: 43-48.
  25. Westendorf P, Richter L and Treu H. 1975. Deep freezing of boar sperma. Laboratory and insemination results using the Hulsenberger Paillete method. Dtsch Tieraztl Wochenschr 82(7): 261-267.
  26. Yanagimachi R, Edited by Knobil E and Neill JD. 1994. Mammalian Fertilization. In The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd edition, Raven, Press, pp. 189-315.