Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회 논문집)

Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the selection of TBM in consideration of field conditions

시공여건을 반영한 TBM선정 방법에 대한 연구

  • 오준근 (고려대학교, 한국철도기술연구원) ;
  • 사공명 (고려대학교, 한국철도기술연구원)
  • Received : 2014.01.28
  • Accepted : 2014.02.28
  • Published : 2014.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, TBM selection methods to meet soil and site conditions were presented. Factors and excavation equipment affecting TBM selection by soil and environmental condition were selected and classified. Weights between equipment and influencing factors selected were calculated by applying the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. The results of the analysis influence factors, Ground condition was a major factor in objective factors and strength was a major factor in the hard condition of criteria factors and water pressure was a major factor in the soft ground condition of criteria factors. In Environment condition, existence of adjacent structures was evaluated more important than existence of feasible site. Lastly, Adequacy was verified through the deduction of results that coincide with input equipment by applying derived weights to actual site conditions.

본 연구에서는 지반 및 현장조건을 고려한 TBM 선정방법을 제시하였다. 지반, 환경, 가격조건별로 TBM 선정에 영향을 미치는 인자와 굴착장비를 선정 분류 하였다. 선정된 영향인자와 장비 간 가중치를 AHP기법을 적용하여 산정하였다. 선정된 영향인자의 분석결과 기본요소에서는 지반조건이 가장 중요한 영향요소로 확인되었으며, 세부요소로서 암반조건에서는 강도, 토사지반조건에서는 수압이 가장 중요한 인자로 확인되었다. 주변 환경조건에서는 시공성에 영향을 줄 수 있는 주변구조물 인접여부가 중요한 인자로 확인되었다. 마지막으로 도출된 각 영향인자별 가중치를 토대로 굴착현장에 적용 가능한 TBM을 선정하고 도출결과와 실제 현장에 적용된 장비의 비교를 통하여 본 연구에서 제안하는 방법에 대한 검증이 이루어 졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. AITES-ITA Working Group No. 14 (2000), Recommendations and Guidelines for Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs), International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, pp. 1-118.
  2. Bieniawski, Z.T., Celada, B., Galera, J.M., Tardaguila, I. (2008), "New applications of the excavability index for selection of TBM types and predicting their performance", World Tunnel Congress 2008 - Underground Facilities for Better Environment and Safety, pp. 1618-1629.
  3. Bryson, N. (1999), "Generating consensus priority point vectors: A logarithmic goal programming", Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 26, pp. 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(98)00083-5
  4. Edalat, K., Vahdatirad M.J., Ghodrat, H., Firouzian, S., Barari, A. (2010), "Choosing TBM for tabriz subway using multi criteria method", Journal of civil engineering and management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 531-539. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.59
  5. German Tunnelling Committee Working Group (2000), Recommendations for selecting and evaluating tunnel boring machines, tunnel 5/97, Deutscher Ausschuss fur unterirdisches Bauen, pp 20-35.
  6. Hamidi, J.K., Shahriar, K., Rezai, B., Rostami, J., Bejari, H. (2010), "Risk assessment based selection of rock TBM for adverse geological conditions using Fuzzy-AHP", Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0260-8
  7. Kim, M.G., Lee, Y.S. (2008), "A suggestion of a new rock mass classification system", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical society, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 43-53.
  8. Korea Express Corporation (1996), road design guideline, Vol. 2, part 5, pp. 41-42.
  9. Maidl, B, Herrenknecht, M, Maidl, U., Wehrmeyer, G. (2012), Mechanised Shield Tunnelling 2nd Edition, Ernst & Sohn, Germany, pp. 262-264, pp. 400-447.
  10. Mikhailov, L. (2004), "Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method", Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 31, pp. 293-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00012-1
  11. Ramanathan, R., Ganesh, L.S. (1994), "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members weightages", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 79, pp. 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90356-5
  12. Saaty, T.L. (1977), "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchy structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  13. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  14. Shahriar, K., Sharifzadeh, M., Hamidi, J.K., (2008), "Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 23, pp. 318-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.06.012
  15. Taheri, A., Borujeni, H.A.M. (2008), "Tunnelling machine selection for tunnel excavation in rock, using AHP method: CASE STUDY: Line 1 of the esfahan metro project", International Conference and Exhibition on Tunnelling, International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association.
  16. Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Yakhchali, S.H. (2012), "TBM selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 30, pp. 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021