DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nutrient Balances and Soil Properties Affected by Application of Soybean and Barley Residues

  • Received : 2014.03.28
  • Accepted : 2014.04.15
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

An accurate analysis of nutrient balance in different cropping systems is necessary for improving soil fertilities, causing higher crop yields and quality. This study was carried out to investigate the nutrient balance, changes in soil properties, and their effects on crop yield in long-term field cultivation under mono- and rotation-cropping systems (MCS and RCS, respectively). The analytical results of the soil properties showed that the application of mineral fertilizers alone in the MCS leads the reduction of soil CEC, exchangeable Ca, and microbial biomass C and N. Compared with the MCS of soybean, the RCS of soybean and barley significantly improved the soil properties, which increased crop yield. It might be due to the barley residue added to the RCS soil. Mean nutrient balances for 4 years were -55.9 kg N, +34.7 kg $P_2O_5$, and -0.3 kg $K_2O$ $ha^{-1}$ for the MCS and +19.7 kg N, +107.4 kg $P_2O_5$, and -48.6 kg $K_2O$ $ha^{-1}$ for the RCS, respectively. These nutrient imbalances mean that conventional fertilizer recommendations were inadequate for maintaining soil nutrient balance. From these results, we can conclude that the crop rotation may change comprehensive physical, chemical, and biological soil properties. These changes could affect the nutrient balance and then the crop yield.

Keywords

References

  1. Bansal, K.N. 1992. Potassium balance in multiple cropping system in a vertisol at Jabalpur, Journal of Potassium Research. 8(1):52-59.
  2. Blake, G.R., and Hartge, K.H. 1986. Bulk density. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. (Ed. A. Klute), Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, 101 USA:365-375.
  3. Dobermann, A., Sta Cruz, P.C., and Casman, K.G. 1996. Fertilizer inputs, nutrient balance, and soil nutrientsupplying power in intensive, irrigated rice systems. I. Potassium uptake and K balance, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 46:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210219
  4. Franzluebbers, A.J. 1999. Introduction to symposium-microbial biomass:Measurement and role in soil quality, Can. J. Soil Sci. 79:505-506. https://doi.org/10.4141/S99-031
  5. Gregorich, E.G., Liang, B.C., Drury, C.F., Mackenzie, A.F., and McGill, W.B. 2000. Elucidation of the source and turnover of water soluble and microbial biomass carbon in agricultural soils, Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:581-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00146-7
  6. Haynes, R.J., and Naidu, R. 1998. Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions:a review, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 51:123-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009738307837
  7. Herencia, J.F., Ruiz-Porras, J.C., Melero, S., Garcia-Galavis, P.A., Morillo, E., and Maqueda, C. 2007. Comparison between organic and mineral fertilization on soil fertility levels, crop macronutrient concentrations, and yield, Agronomy J. 99: 973-983. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0168
  8. Hooda, P.S., Truesdale, V.W., Edwards, A.C., Withers, P.J.A., Aitken, M.N., Miller, A., and Rendell, A.R. 2001. Manuring and fertilization effects on phosphorus accumulation in soils and potential environmental implications, Adv. Environ. Res. 5:13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00037-X
  9. Insam, H., Parkinson D., and Domsch K. H. 1989. I Influence of macroclimate on soil microbial biomass, Soil Biol. Biochem. 21(2):211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(89)90097-7
  10. Kang, Y.I., Lee, I.B., Park, J.M., Kang, Y.G., Kim, S.H., Ko, H.S., and Kwon, J.K. 2009. Relationship between Soil Management Methods and Soil Chemical Properties in Protected Cultivation, Korean J. Environ. Agri. 28(4):333-339. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2009.28.4.333
  11. Kim, Y.R. 2011. 'Ethanosolv pretreatment of barley straw for fuel ethanol production', PhD thesis, Chonbuk University.
  12. Lee, D.K., Kim, H.R., and Hong, S.Y. 1998. Heavy rainfall over Korea during 1980-1990, Korean J. Atmos. Sci. 1(1):32-50.
  13. Magen, H. 2008. Balanced crop nutrition:Fertilizing for crop and food quality, Turk. J. Agric. For. 32:183-193.
  14. Mando, A., Strosnijder, L., and Brussard, L. 1996. Effects of termites on infiltration into crushed soil, Geoderma. 74:107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(96)00058-4
  15. Moore, J.M., Klose, S., and Tabatabai, M.A. 2000. Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as affected by cropping systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 31:200-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050646
  16. Motomatsu, T. 1990. Research plan to increase the land utility in Japan. In:Han K.H. and Jo I. S., (eds.), Strategic development in future and results of farmland cultivation project. Proceedings of symposium. Suwon (Korea); Rural Development Administration, 161-183.
  17. Park, C.Y., Kang, U.G., Hwang, G.S., and Jung, Y.T. 1993. Changes of crop yields according to cropping systems and fertilizing levels in paddy-upland rotation soils, J. Agric. Sci. (S&F). 35(1):281-288.
  18. RDA 1995. Standard investigation methods for agriculture experiment. RDA (Rural Development Administration, Korea), Suwon (in Korean).
  19. Rego, T.J., Rao, V.N., Seeling, B., Pardhasaradhi, G., and Kumar Rao, J.V.D.K. 2003. Nutrient balances-a guide to improving sorghum and groundnut-based dryland cropping systems in semi-arid tropical India, Field Crops Research. 81(1):53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00199-5
  20. Undurraga, P., Zagal, R., Sepulveda, G., and Valderrama, N. 2009. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in Andisol for six crop rotations with different soil management intensity, Chilean J. Agricultural Research. 69:445-454.
  21. Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., and Jenkinson, D.S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon, Soil Biol. Bio-chem. 19:703-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
  22. Zuo, Y., and Zhang, F. 2009. Iron and zinc biofortification strategies in dicot plants by intercropping with gramineous species. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29(1):63-71. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008055