DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-Channel Behavior for Fashion Product Purchases and the Difference of Perceived Risk by Channel Type -The Case of College Men and Women-

패션 상품 구매 과정에서의 다중 경로 활용과 경로별 위험 지각 차이 -대학생 성별에 따른 비교-

  • Chung, Ihn Hee (Dept. of Materials Design Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 정인희 (금오공과대학교 소재디자인공학과)
  • Received : 2014.02.21
  • Accepted : 2014.04.11
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

This study investigated consumers' multi-channel behavior for fashion product purchases and compared perceived risks by channel type. A survey involving male and female college students was conducted in the Daegu and Gyungbuk area in December 2013. A total of 400 responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square analysis, independent sample t-test, paired t-test, factor analysis, and reliability analysis. An internet shopping mall was the most frequently chosen retailer type for fashion product purchases and information searches. In addition, respondents also preferred independent branded stores, department stores, and non-branded stores. The number of retailer types for clothing item purchases ranged from 1 to 6 and the average was 3.06. The number of retailer types was significantly higher in women groups according to gender variables. Perceived risk had the highest evaluation score for internet shopping malls. Department stores were recognized as a reliable retailer type. The construct of perceived risk was shown as similar in off-line stores such as department stores, independent branded stores, and non-branded stores. Instead, the construct was differentiated from the case of internet shopping malls. Some insightful suggestions were suggested for future research and industrial marketing plans based on the results.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghekyan-Simonian, M., Forsythe, S., Kwon, W. S., & Chattaraman, V. (2012). The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase intentions for apparel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(3), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.03.006
  2. Bang, K. S. (2013). Study on risk behavior and risk perception in purchase of outdoor wear according to participation motivation of mountain climbing activity. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul.
  3. Chang, E. C., & Tseng, Y. F. (2013). E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 864-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.012
  4. Chung, I. H. (2011). Fashion marketing. Seoul: Sigongart.
  5. Chung, I. H. (2012). Consumer's multi-channel choice in relation to fashion innovativeness and fashion items. International Journal of Management Cases, 14(4), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.5848/APBJ.2012.00083
  6. Chung, I. H., Chae, J. M., Kim, J. Y., Moon, H. K., Lee, M. A., Ji, H. K., Kim, H. S., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Internet marketing for fashion product. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  7. Gutierrez, S. S., Izquierdom, C. C., & Cabezudo, R. S. J. (2010). Product and channel-related risk and involvement in online context. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.09.005
  8. Kang, Y. S., & Chung, B. S. (2007). A study on the perceived risk of e-commerce and the pre-purchase intention of internet shopping mall users according to gender. Management Information Systems Review, 23, 135-156.
  9. Kim, J. H., & Lee, J. H. (2011). A study on factors that affect the selection of multichannel in the apparel retail-Based on the characteristics of marketing and customer-. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(7), 801-815. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.7.801
  10. Kim, J. Y. (2013). The effect of UNIQLO's online and offline brand images on the purchase intention as a multichannel brand. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 21 (1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2013.21.1.042
  11. Kim, S. H. (2009). The differences in clothing shopping orientation and shopping behaviors by the multi-store selection of internet and offline stores. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(5), 764-774. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.5.764
  12. Lee, K. H., & Choi, J. Y. (2007). The role of attitude in the relationship between perceived risk and purchase intention in the context of fashion shopping products online. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 15(3), 472-482.
  13. Nam, E. H., & Lee, J. H. (2009). The effects of perceived risks on purchase decision behavior among internet fashion consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(11), 1707-1718. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.11.1707
  14. Noble, S. M., Griffith, D. A., & Weinberger, M. G. (2005). Consumer derived utilitarian value and channel utilization in a multi-channel retail context. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1643-1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.10.005
  15. Park, H. S., & Kim, H. S. (2011). The effect of benefits and online shopping risks on channel selection for luxury fashion items. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.1.013
  16. Verhoef, P. C., Neslin, S. A., & Vroomen, B. (2007). Multichannel customer management: Understanding the research shopper phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.002

Cited by

  1. Influences of channel assessment on the usage levels of multi-channels by product category in decision making process for purchasing fashion products vol.24, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2016.24.6.803
  2. Analysis of Multichannel Choice Behavior based on Apparel items vol.17, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.6.919
  3. Clothing Expense, Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk of Male and Female Customers of Various Fashion Retail Channels vol.39, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.5.714
  4. A study on Consumer’s Preference for Fashion Mobile Shopping Application vol.68, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2018.68.8.113