인터넷정보학회논문지 (Journal of Internet Computing and Services)

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.109-127
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1598-0170(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1136(eISSN)
한국인터넷정보학회 (Korean Society for Internet Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3DTV방송기술 표준화과정의 참여자간 상호작용 : 행위자 네트워크 이론기반 사례연구

A Study on the Interactions between the Actors of the 3D Broadcasting Standardization Process

  • Song, Kyung Hee (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwak, Kyu Tae (College of Business, Dept. of Cultural Industry Management, Honam University) ;
  • Park, Soo Kyung (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Bong Gyou (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.04
  • 심사 : 2014.01.17
  • 발행 : 2014.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 기존의 표준관련 연구가 실제로 표준이 만들어지고 보급되는 제반 사회적 환경과 다중 이해관계자가 존재하는 복합적인 사회시스템에서의 행위자 역할 및 변화과정을 조망하는 작업이 충분히 이루어지지 못했다는 데에서 문제의식을 갖고 출발한다. 이를 배경으로 본 연구는 사회-기술적 제도 환경의 맥락에서 각기 다른 이해관계를 가진 참여자들이 혁신적인 기술을 개발해 표준화해가는 동태적 과정을 사회-기술적 접근으로 재구성하는 것을 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위한 세부 목표는 첫째, 표준화 과정을 둘러싼 사회-기술적 네트워크에서 인간 행위자 간, 인간과 비인간 행위자와의 상호작용 관계의 특징을 살펴보는 것이다. 둘째로는 표준화 과정을 선도한 핵심 행위자의 활동과 역할의 변화를 관찰하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여, 행위자-네트워크 이론(Actor Network Theory)에 기초하여 한국에서 진행된 고화질 3DTV방송기술의 표준화 과정의 동태적 속성을 분석하였다. 분석방법은 연구자가 행위자-네트워크에 직접 참여하여 동태적 특성을 분석하고, 설문 인터뷰와 심층 인터뷰를 통한 질적 연구의 방법을 적용, 표준 형성과정에 나타난 제반 환경-행위-기술 동학을 고찰하였다.

This study is devised out of the recognition that the existing standardization-related research has not sufficiently examined the overall social environment where a standard is actually made and diffused and the roles of the actors and the changes in them in the complex social system where multiple stakeholders exist. Against this backdrop, this study purports to reconstruct the dynamic process of developing and standardizing an innovative technology through a socio-technical approach involved by multiple stakeholders with different interests in the context of a socio-technical institutional environment. The specific goals to achieve the purpose include first, inspecting the characteristics of the interactions between the human actors and between the human and non-human actors in the socio-technical network surrounding a standardization process. Second, the study aimed to observe the activities of the focal actor who led the standardization process and its changing role. To that end, it analyzed the dynamic features of the process of standardizing a HD 3DTV broadcasting technology that took place in South Korea based on the actor network theory. As for the analysis method, the researchers personally took part in the actor network involving the new technology to analyze the dynamic characteristics of the network, applying the qualitative research method of survey and in-depth interviews and exploring the overall dynamics of environment, behavior and technology observed over the course of the entire standardization process.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. G. Tassey, "Standardization in Technology-based Markets", Research Policy, vol.29, no,4, 2000, pp.587-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00091-8
  2. R.N. Langlois and D.A. Savage, "Standards, Modularity and Innovation: the Case of Medical Practice", Path Dependence and Path Creation, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001, pp.149-168.
  3. C. Matutes, P. Regibeau and K. Rockett, "Optimal Patent Design and the Diffusion of Innovations", The RAND Journal of Economics, 1996, pp.60-83.
  4. A.L. Russell, "Standardization in History: A Review Essay with an Eye to the Future", The Standards Edge: Future Generations, 2005, pp.247-260.
  5. M.J. Oh, Y.S. Cho and S.W. Shin, "A Delphi Survey for Establishment of Standards Development Strategy in Digital Publication", Journal of Internet Computing and Services, vol.14, no.3, 2013, pp.1-13.
  6. M.A. Cusumano, Y. Mylonadis and R.S. Rosenbloom, "Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta", Business History Review, vol.66, no.1, 1992, pp.51-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3117053
  7. J. Farrell and G. Saloner, "Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation", The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985, pp.70-83.
  8. N. Gandal, D. Salant and L. Waverman, "Standards in Wireless Telephone Networks", Telecommunications Policy, vol.27, no.5, 2003, pp.325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00026-0
  9. C. Shapiro and H.R. Varian, "The Art of Standards Wars", 1999, pp.8-32.
  10. W.E. Bijker and J. Law, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-technical Change, MIT press, 1992.
  11. D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, The Social Shaping of Technology, Open University Press, 1999.
  12. K. Jakobs, "Shaping User-side Innovation through Standardisation: The Example of ICT", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.73, no.1, 2006, pp.27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.007
  13. K. Lyytinen and J. Damsgaard. What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory?, Springer US, 2001.
  14. M. Callon and B. Latour, "La Science telle qu\'elle se fait", 1991.
  15. M.L. Tushman and L. Rosenkopf, "Organizational Determinants of Technological-Change-toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution", Research in Organizational behavior, vol.14, 1992, pp.311-347.
  16. V. Fomin, T. Keil and K. Lyytinen. "Theorizing about Standardization: Integrating Fragments of Process Theory in Light of Telecommunication Standardization wars", 2003.
  17. C. Wright, A. Sturdy and N. Wylie, "Management Innovation through Standardization: Consultants as Standardizers of Organizational Practice", Research Policy, vol.41, no.3, 2012, pp.652-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.004
  18. J.P. Doh and T.R. Guay, "Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional- Stakeholder Perspective", Journal of Management Studies, vol.43, no.1, 2006, pp.47-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x
  19. N. Faysse, "Troubles on the Way: An Analysis of the Challenges Faced by Multi-Stakeholder Platforms", Natural Resources Forum, vol.30, no.3. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006.
  20. ISO/IEC: Guide2, Standardization and Related Activities - General Vocabulary, ISO/IEC: 2004.
  21. Telecommnunication Technology Association, IT Technology Strandard and Intellectual Property Strategy, 2006.
  22. R.H. Allen, and R.D. Sriram, "The Role of Standards in Innovation", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.64, no.2, 2000, pp.171-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00104-3
  23. P. Belleflamme, "Coordination on Formal vs. De Facto Standards: A Dynamic Approach", European Journal of Political Economy, vol.18, no.1, 2002, pp.153-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(01)00073-8
  24. J. Farrell, and G. Saloner, "Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation", The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985, pp.70-83.
  25. P. Anderson and M.L. Tushman, "Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change", Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, pp.604-633.
  26. J.W. Meyer and W.R. Scott, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
  27. J.R. Lee, "A Study on the Emergence of New Stakeholders in the European Standardization Process: a Political Dilemma between Supranationalism and National Delegation Principle", Social Science Studies, vol.19, no.2, 2011, pp.204-234.
  28. E.J. Iversen, "Raising Standards: Innovation and the Emerging Global Standardization Environment for ICTs", Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2001 2nd IEEE Conference. IEEE, 2001.
  29. S. Kano, "Technical Innovations, Standardization and Regional Comparison-A Case Study in Mobile Communications", Telecommunications Policy, Vol.24, no.4, 2000, pp.305-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00020-3
  30. E.M. Rogers, "Diffusion of Innovations/Everett M. Rogers", 2003.
  31. A.H. Van de Ven, "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation", Management Science, vol.32, no.5, 1986, pp. 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  32. E.M. Rogers, "Lessons for Guidelines from the Diffusion of Innovations", The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, vol.21, no.7, 1995.
  33. A. Giddens, Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics, Stanford University Press, 1994.
  34. D. Harrisson and M. Laberge, "Innovation, Identities and Resistance: The Social Construction of an Innovation Network", Journal of Management Studies, vol.39, no.4, 2002, pp.497-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00301
  35. P.J. DiMaggio and W.W. Powell, "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Frields", American Sociological Review, vol.48, no.2, 1983, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  36. P.J. DiMaggio, "Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory", Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, vol.1, 1988, pp.3-22.
  37. M. Granovetter, "Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 1985, pp.481-510.
  38. M. Callon and J. Law, "On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-enrolment", Social Studies of Science, vol.12, no.4, 1982, pp.615-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012004006
  39. M. Callon, "Technological Conception and Adoption Network: Lessons for the CTA Practitioner", Managing Technology in Society: the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, London, Pinter Thomas, 1995.
  40. L.A. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge University press, 1987.
  41. B. Latour, The Powers of Association, Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge, 1986, pp.264-280.
  42. B. Latour, "Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern", Critical Inquiry, vol.30, no.2, 2004, pp.225-248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
  43. J. Law, "Notes on the Theory of the Actor-network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity", Systems Practice, vol.5, no.4, 1992, pp.379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
  44. Y.J. Bae, "Actor-Network Theory and The Politics of Technology Standard: The Case of AVS(Audio Vedio Coding Standard) in China", Korean Journal of Political Science, vol.19, no.2, 2011, pp. 281-305.
  45. M. Callon, "Actor-network Theory-the Market Test", Actor Network Theory and After, 1999, pp. 181-195.
  46. J. Welshman, "The Medical Officer of Health in England and Wales, 1900-1974: watchdog or lapdog?", Journal of Public Health, vol.19, no.4, 1997, pp.443-450. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024675
  47. B. Latour, "Reassembling the Social-an Introduction to Actor-network-theory", Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, by Bruno Latour, Foreword by Bruno Latour. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.316.
  48. National IT Industry Promotion Agency, "3DTV Broadcasting Standard", Matket Trend, 2013.
  49. Y.B. Go, Social Dictionary, Social Culture Research Center, 2000.
  50. S.Y. Jang and W.S. Jang, "A Qualitative Study on Organizational Adaptation of College Graduates with Early Careers", International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, vol.11, no.3, 2008, pp.105-138.
  51. M. Caollon, "Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation", Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions, 1986, pp.57-131.
  52. S.N. Oh and B.G. Lee, "Analyzing Standardization Trends and Strategies of Managed Services", Proceeding of Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 2012, pp.83-84.
  53. H.J. Jung, "On the Application Plan Study of International Standard Tendency in Software Quality Testing", Journal of Internet Computing and Services, vol.7, no.4, 2006, pp.1-10.
  54. P. Pierson, "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics", American Political Science Review, 2000, pp.251-267.
  55. D.C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.