DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Chk2 Regulates Cell Cycle Progression during Mouse Oocyte Maturation and Early Embryo Development

  • Dai, Xiao-Xin (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Duan, Xing (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Hong-Lin (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University) ;
  • Cui, Xiang-Shun (Department of Animal Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Hyung (Department of Animal Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Sun, Shao-Chen (College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2013.09.16
  • Accepted : 2013.12.13
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

As a tumor suppressor homologue during mitosis, Chk2 is involved in replication checkpoints, DNA repair, and cell cycle arrest, although its functions during mouse oocyte meiosis and early embryo development remain uncertain. We investigated the functions of Chk2 during mouse oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Chk2 exhibited a dynamic localization pattern; Chk2 expression was restricted to germinal vesicles at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage, was associated with centromeres at pro-metaphase I (Pro-MI), and localized to spindle poles at metaphase I (MI). Disrupting Chk2 activity resulted in cell cycle progression defects. First, inhibitor-treated oocytes were arrested at the GV stage and failed to undergo germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD); this could be rescued after Chk2 inhibition release. Second, Chk2 inhibition after oocyte GVBD caused MI arrest. Third, the first cleavage of early embryo development was disrupted by Chk2 inhibition. Additionally, in inhibitor-treated oocytes, checkpoint protein Bub3 expression was consistently localized at centromeres at the MI stage, which indicated that the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) was activated. Moreover, disrupting Chk2 activity in oocytes caused severe chromosome misalignments and spindle disruption. In inhibitor-treated oocytes, centrosome protein ${\gamma}$-tubulin and Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) were dissociated from spindle poles. These results indicated that Chk2 regulated cell cycle progression and spindle assembly during mouse oocyte maturation and early embryo development.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J., Urist, M., and Prives, C. (2004). The Chk2 protein kinase. DNA Repair 3, 1039-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.033
  2. Antoni, L., Sodha, N., Collins, I., and Garrett, M.D. (2007). CHK2 kinase: cancer susceptibility and cancer therapy-two sides of the same coin? Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 925-936. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2251
  3. Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2001). Mammalian G1-and S-phase checkpoints in response to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 738-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00280-5
  4. Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2003). Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 3, 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00110-7
  5. Blasina, A., de Weyer, I.V., Laus, M.C., Luyten, W.H., Parker, A.E., and McGowan, C.H. (1999). A human homologue of the checkpoint kinase Cds1 directly inhibits Cdc25 phosphatase. Curr. Biol. 9, 1-10.
  6. Brunet, S., and Maro, B. (2005). Cytoskeleton and cell cycle control during meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte: integrating time and space. Reproduction 130, 801-811. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00364
  7. Callegari, A.J., and Kelly, T.J. (2007). Shedding light on the DNA damage checkpoint. Cell Cycle 6, 660-666. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.6.3984
  8. Castedo, M., Perfettini, J.-L., Roumier, T., Yakushijin, K., Horne, D., Medema, R., and Kroemer, G. (2004). The cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk2 is a negative regulator of mitotic catastrophe. Oncogene 23, 4353-4361. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207573
  9. Chen, L., Chao, S.-B., Wang, Z.-B., Qi, S.-t., Zhu, X.-L., Yang, S.- W., Yang, C.-R., Zhang, Q.-H., Ouyang, Y.-C., and Hou, Y. (2012). Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for meiotic cell cycle regulation in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle 11, 1948-1955. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.20279
  10. Joukov, V., Groen, A.C., Prokhorova, T., Gerson, R., White, E., Rodriguez, A., Walter, J.C., and Livingston, D.M. (2006). The BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer modulates ran-dependent mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 127, 539-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.053
  11. Li, M., Li, S., Yuan, J., Wang, Z.-B., Sun, S.-C., Schatten, H., and Sun, Q.-Y. (2009). Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS One 4, e7701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007701
  12. MacQueen, A.J., and Villeneuve, A.M. (2001). Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev. 15, 1674-1687. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.902601
  13. Masrouha, N., Yang, L., Hijal, S., Larochelle, S., and Suter, B. (2003). The Drosophila chk2 gene loki is essential for embryonic DNA double-strand-break checkpoints induced in S phase or G2. Genetics 163, 973-982.
  14. Matsuoka, S., Huang, M., and Elledge, S.J. (1998). Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282, 1893-1897. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5395.1893
  15. Musacchio, A., and Salmon, E.D. (2007). The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393.
  16. Pahlavan, G., Polanski, Z., Kalab, P., Golsteyn, R., Nigg, E.A., and Maro, B. (2000). Characterization of polo-like kinase 1 during meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev. Biol. 220, 392-400. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9656
  17. Polanski, Z. (2012). Spindle assembly checkpoint regulation of chromosome segregation in mammalian oocytes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 25, 472-483.
  18. Reinhardt, H.C., and Yaffe, M.B. (2009). Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.018
  19. Sato, K., Ohta, T., and Venkitaraman, A.R. (2010). A mitotic role for the DNA damage-responsive CHK2 kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 424-425. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0510-424
  20. Stolz, A., Ertych, N., Kienitz, A., Vogel, C., Schneider, V., Fritz, B., Jacob, R., Dittmar, G., Weichert, W., and Petersen, I. (2010). The CHK2-BRCA1 tumour suppressor pathway ensures chromosomal stability in human somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2051
  21. Stolz, A., Ertych, N., and Bastians, H. (2011). Tumor suppressor CHK2: regulator of DNA damage response and mediator of chromosomal stability. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1215
  22. Sun, S.-C., Zhang, D.-X., Lee, S.-E., Xu, Y.-N., and Kim, N.-H. (2011). Ndc80 regulates meiotic spindle organization, chromosome alignment, and cell cycle progression in mouse oocytes. Microsc. Microanal. 17, 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000274
  23. Sun, S.-C., Liu, H.-L., and Sun, Q.-Y. (2012). Survivin regulates Plk1 localization to kinetochore in mouse oocyte meiosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 421, 797-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.04.089
  24. Tong, C., Fan, H.-Y., Lian, L., Li, S.-W., Chen, D.-Y., Schatten, H., and Sun, Q.-Y. (2002). Polo-like kinase-1 is a pivotal regulator of microtubule assembly during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic mitosis. Biol. Reprod. 67, 546-554. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.546
  25. Tsvetkov, L., Xu, X., Li, J., and Stern, D.F. (2003). Polo-like kinase 1 and Chk2 interact and co-localize to centrosomes and the midbody. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8468-8475. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211202200
  26. Xiong, B., Li, S., Ai, J.-S., Yin, S., OuYang, Y.-C., Sun, S.-C., Chen, D.-Y., and Sun, Q.-Y. (2008). BRCA1 is required for meiotic spindle assembly and spindle assembly checkpoint activation in mouse oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 79, 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.069641
  27. Xu, J., and Du, W. (2003). Drosophila chk2 plays an important role in a mitotic checkpoint in syncytial embryos. FEBS Lett. 545, 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00536-2
  28. Zhou, B.-B.S., and Elledge, S.J. (2000). The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408, 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/35044005

Cited by

  1. CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond vol.6, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mju045
  2. Bioinformatic search for Ca2+- and calmodulin-dependent protein kinases potentially associated with the regulation of plant cytoskeleton vol.51, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452717040053
  3. The ART of selecting the best embryo: A review of early embryonic mortality and bovine embryo viability assessment methods vol.82, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22525
  4. Effect of fasting and subsequent refeeding on the transcriptional profiles of brain in juvenile Spinibarbus hollandi vol.14, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214589
  5. CHK2 is essential for spindle assembly and DNA repair during the first cleavage of mouse embryos vol.12, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103267
  6. ATR signaling in mammalian meiosis: From upstream scaffolds to downstream signaling vol.61, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22401