DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D Printed Titanium Implant for the Skull Reconstruction: A Preliminary Case Study

  • Choi, Jong-Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulsan University, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Ahn, Jae-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2014.11.24
  • Accepted : 2014.12.01
  • Published : 2014.12.20

Abstract

The skull defect can be made after the trauma, oncologic problems or neurosurgery. The skull reconstruction has been the challenging issue in craniofacial fields for a long time. So far the skull reconstruction with autogenous bone would be the standard. Although the autogenous bone would be the ideal one for skull reconstruction, donor site morbidity would be the inevitable problem in many cases. Meanwhile various types of allogenic and alloplastic materials have been also used. However, skull reconstruction with many alloplastic material have produced no less complications including infection, exposure, and delayed wound healing. Because the 3D printing technique evolved so fast that 3D printed titanium implant were possible recently. The aim of this trial is to try to restore the original skull anatomy as possible using the 3D printed titanium implant, based on the mirrored three dimensional CT images based on the computer simulation. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) data were processed for the patient and a rapid prototyping (RP) model was produced. At the same time, the uninjured side was mirrored and superimposed onto the traumatized side, to create a mirror-image of the RP model. And we fabricated Titanium implant to reconstruct three-dimensional orbital structure in advance, using the 3D printer. This prefabricated Titanium-implant was then inserted onto the defected skull and fixed. Three dimensional printing technique of titanium material based on the computer simulation turned out to be very successful in this patient. Individualized approach for each patient could be an ideal way to manage the traumatic patients in near future.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang TJ, Choi JW, Ra YS, Hong SH, Cho YH, Koh KS. Changes in graft thickness after skull defect reconstruction with autogenous split calvarial bone graft. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2014;25(4):1241-1244. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000924
  2. Habal MB. Repair of a skull defect by a split cranial bone graft. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 1992;3(4):230-234. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199212000-00011
  3. Liao CC, Kao MC. Cranioplasty for patients with severe depressed skull bone defect after cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Journal of clinical neuroscience: Official Journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2002;9(5):553-555. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2002.1116
  4. Vignes JR, Jeelani N, Dautheribes M, San-Galli F, Liguoro D. Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in children. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2007;35(3):185-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.002
  5. Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Yoshida T, Igawa H, Sugihara T, Ohura T, et al. Role of bone graft in reconstruction of skull base defect: is a bone graft necessary. Skull Base Surgery 1993;3(4):223-229. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1060587
  6. Ventola CL. Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. P & T: A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management 2014;39(10):704-711.
  7. Stoodley MA, Abbott JR, Simpson DA. Titanium cranioplasty using 3-D computer modelling of skull defects. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 1996;3(2):149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-5868(96)90009-0