Journal of International Society for Simulation Surgery

International Society for Simulation Surgery (국제컴퓨터가상수술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Shoulder Surgeries

  • Kim, Sung-Hwan (Arthroscopy & Joint Research Institute and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ha, Seung-Joo (Arthroscopy & Joint Research Institute and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2014.12.05
  • Accepted : 2014.12.08
  • Published : 2014.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

3-D medical image reconstruction technique using computer simulation technology has been used in the knowledge of the anatomical features and the biomechanical characteristics with the advancement of computer hardware and software. Especially, the use of 3-D image reconstruction technique in orthopaedics demonstrates that this technique is useful to improve surgical technique as well as to help inform the knowledge of shoulder joint anatomy. The purpose of this article is to introduce the utilization of 3-D image technology in shoulder surgeries.

Keywords

References

  1. Robertson DD, Sutherland CJ, Chan BW, Hodge JC, Scott WW, Fishman EK. Depiction of pelvic fractures using 3D volumetric holography: comparison of plain X-ray and CT. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1995;19(6):967-974 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199511000-00024
  2. Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, Neuman JD, Mauger DT, Kasales CJ. Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering. Radiology 2000;214(2):517-522 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe34517
  3. Pena E, Calvo B, Martinez MA, Doblare M. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint. Journal of Biomechanics 2006;39(9):1686-1701 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.030
  4. Oh JH, Song BW. The Current State of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Clin Should Elbow 2011;14(2):253-261 https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2011.14.2.253
  5. DeLude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA, et al. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2007;16(4):477-483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.016
  6. Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2002;11(4):331-338 https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.124429
  7. Roche C, Angibaud L, Flurin PH, Wright T, Fulkerson E, Zuckerman J. Anatomic Validation of an "Anatomic" Shoulder System. Bulletin [Hospital for Joint Diseases(New York, N.Y.)] 2006;63(3-4):93-97
  8. Jeong J. Shoulder Prosthesis Mechanics. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc 2010;13(1):153-160 https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2010.13.1.153
  9. Pearl ML. Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: Implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2005;14(1 Suppl S):99s-104s https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.025
  10. Yoo JH, Chung ST, Jo BC, Hyung JW, Bak DJ. Structural Analysis of Proximal Humerus in Korean. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2013;48(5):359-365 https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.5.359
  11. Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British Volume 1997;79(5):857-865 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7579
  12. Cho SW, Jharia TK, Moon YL, Sim SW, Shin DS, Bigliani LU. Threedimensional templating arthroplasty of the humeral head. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA 2013;35(8):685-688 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1090-8
  13. Pearl ML, Volk AG. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and elbow surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 1995;4(4):286-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80022-9
  14. Polster JM, Subhas N, Scalise JJ, Bryan JA, Lieber ML, Schickendantz MS. Three-dimensional volume-rendering computed tomography for measuring humeral version. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2010;19(6):899-907 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.047
  15. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Volume 2006;88(10):2279-2292 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00125
  16. Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Volume 1992;74(4):491-500 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274040-00004
  17. Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA 3rd. Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2007;16(3 Suppl):S111-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008
  18. Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Dembitsky N, Patil S, D'Lima DD. Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2008;17(4):637-641 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.021
  19. Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1992;74(7):1032-1037 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274070-00009
  20. Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H. Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/ American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2001;10(4):327-332 https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.115269
  21. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The Journal of Arthroplasty 1999;14(6):756-760 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90232-2
  22. Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D'Lima DD. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2010;19(2):166-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.009
  23. Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk fac tors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Volume 2006;88(8):1755-1763 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00817
  24. Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Volume 2000;82(1):35-46 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200001000-00005
  25. Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Yung PS, et al. Prevalence, pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: CT analysis of 218 patients. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008;190(5):1247-1254 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3009
  26. Huijsmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, van der Hulst VP, Willems WJ. Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow surgery/American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 2007;16(6):803-809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.115
  27. Bishop JY, Jones GL, Rerko MA, Donaldson C. 3-D CT is the most reliable imaging modality when quantifying glenoid bone loss. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2013;471(4):1251-1256 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2607-x