Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Dietary Fermented Seaweed and Seaweed Fusiforme on Growth Performance, Carcass Parameters and Immunoglobulin Concentration in Broiler Chicks

  • Choi, Y.J. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, S.R. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Oh, J.W. (Department of Animal Biotechnology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2014.01.08
  • Accepted : 2014.03.17
  • Published : 2014.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of brown seaweed (Undaria pinnatifida) by-product and seaweed fusiforme (Hizikia fusiformis) by-product supplementation on growth performance and blood profiles including serum immunoglobulin (Ig) in broilers. Fermentation of seaweeds was conducted by Bacillus subtilis and Aspergillus oryzae. In a 5-wk feeding trial, 750 one-d-old broiler chicks were divided into 5 groups, and were assigned to the control diet or experimental diets including control+0.5% brown seaweed (BS) by-product, control+0.5% seaweed fusiforme (SF) by-product, control+0.5% fermented brown seaweed (FBS) by-product, and control+0.5% fermented seaweed fusiforme (FSF) by-product. As a consequence, body weight gain (BWG) and gain:feed of seaweed by-product groups were clearly higher, when compared to those of control diet group from d 18 to 35 and the entire experimental period (p<0.05). In mortality rate, seaweed by-product groups were significantly lower when compared to control diet group during entire experimental period (p<0.05). However, Feed Intake of experimental diets group was not different from that of the control group during the entire experimental period. Whereas, Feed Intake of fermented seaweed by-product groups was lower than that of non-fermented seaweed groups (p<0.05). Total organ weights, lipids, and glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (GOT) of all treatment groups were not different from those of control group. However, glutamic pyruvate transaminase (GPT) of all treatment groups was higher than that of control group at d 17 (p<0.05). In case of serum Igs concentration, the concentration of IgA antibody in BS, SF, FSF treatment groups was significantly higher than in control group at d 35 (p<0.01). IgA concentration in FBS supplementation groups was negligibly decreased when compared to the control group. IgM concentration in the serums of all treatment groups was significantly higher than in control group (p<0.05) and in fermented seaweed by-product groups were much higher than in non-fermented seaweed groups (p<0.05). On the other hand, IgG concentrations in all treatment groups were lower than in control group (p<0.05). Taken together, our results suggest that by-product dietary supplementation of BS, SF, FBS, and FSF in poultry may provide positive effects of growth performance and immune response.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. J., Y. S. Kim, and K. P. Park. 2004. Storage of waste-brown seaweed and degradation of alginate using microorganism. J. Environ. Sci. 13:313-318.
  2. Allen, V. G. and K. R. Pond. 2002. Seaweed Supplement Diet for Enhancing Immune Response in Mammals and Poultry. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  3. Ayasan, T. and F. Okan. 2001. The effect of a diet with different probiotic (protexin) levels on the fattening performance and carcass characteristics of Japanese quails. Proceedings of XVth European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat. September 9-12, 2011; Kusadasi, Turkey. pp. 169-174.
  4. Ayasan, 2013. Effects of dietary inclusion of protexin (probiotic) on hatchability of Japanese quails. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 83:78-81.
  5. Awad, W., K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem, and J. Bohm. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 88:49-56. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
  6. Cabuk, M., M. Bozkurt, A. Alcicek, Y. Akbas, and K. Kucukyilmaz. 2006. Effect of a herbal essential oil mixture on growth and internal organ weight of broilers from young and old breeder flocks. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 36:135-141.
  7. El-Deek, A. A. and M. A. Brikaa. 2009. Nutritional and biological evaluation of marine seaweed as a feedstuff and as a pellet binder in poultry diet. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 8:875-881. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.875.881
  8. El-Husseiny, O. M., A. G. Abdallah, and K. O. Abdel-Latif. 2008. The influence of biological feed additives on broiler performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci 7:862-871. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.862.871
  9. Engberg, R. M., M. S. Hedemann, T. D. Leser, and B. B. Jensen. 2000. Effect of zinc bacitracin and salinomycin on intestinal microflora and performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 79:1311-1319. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.9.1311
  10. Jimenez-Escrig, A. and F. J. Sanchez-Muniz. 2000. Dietary fibre from edible seaweeds: Chemical structure, physicochemical properties and effects on cholesterol metabolism. Nutr. Res. 20:585-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(00)00149-4
  11. Jimenez-Escrig, A., E. Gomez-Ordonez, and P. Ruperez. 2011. Seaweed as a source of novel nutraceuticals: Sulfated polysaccharides and peptides. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 64:325-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387669-0.00026-0
  12. Kang, K. S., I. D. Kim, R. H. Kwon, and B. J. Ha. 2008. Undaria pinnatifida fucoidan extract protects against CCl4-induced oxidative stress. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 13:168-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-007-0101-1
  13. Katayama, M., M. Katayama, T. Fukuda, T. Okamura, E. Suzuki, K. Tamura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Suda, and K. Suzuki. 2011. Effect of dietary addition of seaweed and licorice on the immune performance of pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 82:274-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00826.x
  14. Kim, M. H. and H. G. Joo. 2008. Immunomodulatory effects of fucoidan on bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Immunol. Lett. 115:138-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2007.10.016
  15. Liu, F., J. Wang, A. K. Changb, B. Liu, L. Yang, Q. Li, P. Wang, and X. Zou. 2012. Fucoidan extract derived from Undaria pinnatifida inhibits angiogenesis by human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Phytomedicine 19:797-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2012.03.015
  16. Lokaewmanee, K., K. Yamauchi, and N. Thongwittaya. 2012. Effects of fermented plant product on growth performance, some blood variables, carcase characteristics, and intestinal histology in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 53:215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.665435
  17. MacArtain, P., C. I. Gill, M. Brooks, R. Campbell, and I. R. Rowland. 2007. Nutritional value of edible seaweeds. Nutr. Rev. 65:535-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00278.x
  18. Michel, C., M. Lahaye, C. Bonnet, S. Mabeau, and J. L. Barry. 1996. In vitro fermentation by human faecal bacteria of total and purified dietary fibres from brown seaweeds. Br. J. Nutr. 75:263-280. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960129
  19. Midilli, M., F. Okan, and C. Kemal. 2008. Effects of dietary probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on growth performance and serum IgG concentration of broilers. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 38:21-27.
  20. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Rev. Ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  21. Phillips, I., M. Casewell, T. Cox, B. D. Groot, C. Friis, R. Jones, C. Nightingale, R. Preston, and J. Waddell. 2004. Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:28-52.
  22. SAS. 2011. User's Guide: Statistics, Version 9.3. Edition. SAS. Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  23. Shimada, T., C. Motonaga, S. Matsuura, M. Takagaki, T. Ashida, T. Okano, and H. Morii. 2004. Effects of a fermented vegetable product on fat deposition and bone metabolism in ovariectomized rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 50:422-425. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.50.422
  24. Sneath, P. H. A., N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe, and J. G. Holt. 1986. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume 2. Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.
  25. Ventura, M. R., J. I. R. Castanon, and J. M. McNab. 1994. Nutritional value of seaweed (Ulva rigida) for poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 49:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90083-3
  26. Wijesinghe, W. and Y. J. Jeon. 2012. Biological activities and potential industrial applications of fucose rich sulfated polysaccharides and fucoidans isolated from brown seaweeds: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 88:13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.029
  27. Yuan, Y. V. and N. A. Walsh. 2006. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of extracts from a variety of edible seaweeds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 44:1144-1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.02.002
  28. Zhang, J., C. Tiller, J. Shen, C. Wang, G. S. Girouard, D. Dennis, C. J. Barrow, M. Miao, and H. S. Ewart. 2007. Antidiabetic properties of polysaccharide- and polyphenolic-enriched fractions from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 85:1116-1123. https://doi.org/10.1139/Y07-105

Cited by

  1. Effects of Inclusion of Fermented Carrageenan By-products in the Basal Diet of Broiler Chickens on Growth Performance, Blood Profiles and Meat Composition vol.16, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.209.214
  2. Feed Supplementation with Red Seaweeds, Chondrus crispus and Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii, Reduce Salmonella Enteritidis in Laying Hens vol.8, pp.1664-302X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00567
  3. Unlocking the potential health and growth benefits of macroscopic algae for poultry vol.74, pp.01, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917001052
  4. Effects of dietary supplementation with fermented and non-fermented brown algae by-products on laying performance, egg quality, and blood profile in laying hens vol.31, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0921
  5. Impact of Feeding Fermented Wet Feed on Broiler Breeder Production Performance and Some Hatchability Traits vol.18, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.116.121
  6. The effects of dietary seaweed inclusion on growth performance of broiler chickens: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.9, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25726.1
  7. A Review of the Varied Uses of Macroalgae as Dietary Supplements in Selected Poultry with Special Reference to Laying Hen and Broiler Chickens vol.8, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8070536
  8. Nutrient Digestibility, Growth Performance, and Blood Indices of Boschveld Chickens Fed Seaweed-Containing Diets vol.10, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081296
  9. Seaweeds, Intact and Processed, as a Valuable Component of Poultry Feeds vol.8, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8080620
  10. Growth performance, breast yield, gastrointestinal ecology and plasma biochemical profile in broiler chickens fed multiple doses of a blend of red, brown and green seaweeds vol.61, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2020.1774512
  11. Sargassum contamination and consequences for downstream uses: a review vol.33, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02250-w
  12. Effect of seaweed-containing diets on visceral organ sizes, carcass characteristics, and meat quality and stability of Boschveld indigenous hens vol.100, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.038
  13. Supplemental Impact of Marine Red Seaweed (Halymenia palmata) on the Growth Performance, Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Profiles, Intestine Histomorphology, Meat Quality, Fecal Gas Emission vol.11, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051244
  14. A comprehensive review on the health benefits and nutritional significance of fucoidan polysaccharide derived from brown seaweeds in human, animals and aquatic organisms vol.27, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.13233
  15. Hizikia fusiformis: Pharmacological and Nutritional Properties vol.10, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071660
  16. Current knowledge and future perspectives of the use of seaweeds for livestock production and meat quality: a systematic review vol.105, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13509