DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Comparison of Strut Tie Model and ACI Traditional by Clear Span-to-Depth Ratio

지간-높이 비에 따른 스트럿-타이 모델과 ACI 고전적인 방법의 설계 비교

  • Lymei, Uy (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konyang University) ;
  • Son, Byung-Jik (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2013.10.07
  • Accepted : 2013.04.10
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

Since clear span-to-depth ratio is used to define what is so called a deep beam, it is an important parameter ratio for study about deep beam. Deep beams can be designed by flexure design method, and shear provided by concrete ($v_c$) and by steel ($v_s$) for deep flexure members are provided in ACI 318-99 [1]. But in later version of ACI (from ACI 318-02) it is not provided and deep beams shall be designed either by taking into account nonlinear distribution of strain or by Appendix A of Strut-and-Tie Models (STM). The trend of deep beam design seems to be familiar with strut-and-tie model, but ACI traditional design is not forgotten. By comparing these two method, there should a point which definitely explain the different between the two methods. In this study, 68 samples result of steel, after reinforcement arrangement, are taken to be analyzed.

깊은 보는 지간-높이 비가 중요한 파라미터이다. 깊은 보를 설계할 때, ACI 318-02 이후 버전에서는 응력의 비선형 분포로 인해서 고전적인 설계 방법이 아니라 스트럿-타이 모델을 부록에 수록하여, 이 방법으로 설계하도록 하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 ACI 고전적인 설계방법과 스트럿-타이 모델을 비교, 분석하였다. 파라미터 연구로 지간-높이 비를 변화시켰으며, 총 68개의 샘플을 분석하였다. 결과로 고전적인 설계 방법과 스트럿-타이 모델은 빔의 지간-높이 비에 따라서 각각 장단점이 있으며, 본 논문에 깊은 보를 설계할 때의 팁이 제시되어 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 318, 1999, "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-99) and Commentary (318RM-99)", American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, pp.163-164, 1999.
  2. ACI Committee 318, 2011, "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-11) and Commentary (318RM-11)", American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, pp. 387-401, 2011.
  3. James K. Wight and James G. MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, Pearson, Six Edition, pp. 879-971, 2012.
  4. James K. Wight and Gustavo J. Parra-Montesinos, Strut-and-Tie Model for Deep Beam Design, Concrete International.
  5. Karl-Heinz Reineck and Lawrence C. Novak, Further Examples for the Design of Structural Concrete with Strut-and-Tie Models, 2011.
  6. Verification and implementation of strut-and-tie Model in LRFD Bridge design Specifications, barney T. Martin, Jr., Phd., P.E., November, 2007.
  7. ACI Structural journal, Design of deep beams suing strut-and-tie models part I&II, Michael D. Brown and Oguzhan Bayrak.