References
- Ministry of Environmen. 2012 WHITE PAPER OF ENVIROMENT. Gwacheon: Ministry of Environment Press; 2012. p.240-272.
- OECD. 2007, Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models. Available: http://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/displaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2007)2& doclanguado=en [accessed 02 July 2013].
- Environmental Protection Agency. User, Aos Guide for The Toxicity Estimation Software Tool: U.S. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency Press; 2012.
- European Community. Regulation(EC) No 1907/ 2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals(REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/reach/index_en.htm [accessed 15 July 2013].
- In YY, Lee SK, Kim PJ, No KT. Prediction of Acute Toxicity to Fathead Minnow by Local Model Based QSAR and Global QSAR Approaches. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2012; 33(2): 613-19. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.2.613
- Furuhama A, Toida T, Nishikawa N, Aoki Y, Yoshioka Y, Shiraishi H. Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity(KATE) system, March 2009 version. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2010; 21(5-6): 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2010.501815
- Pizzo F, Lombardo A, Manganaro A, Benfenati E. In silico models for predicting ready biodegradability under REACH: A comparative study. Sci Total Environ. 2013; 463-464: 161-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.060
- Teubner W, Mehling A, Schuster PX, Guth K, Worth A, Burton J, et al. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013; 67(3): 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.007
- Kovarich S, Papa E, Li J, Gramatica P. QSAR classification models for the screening of the endocrinedisrupting activity of perfluorinated compounds. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2012; 23(3-4): 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2012.657235
- Freidig AP, Dekkers S, Verwei M, Zvinavashe E, Bessems JGM, Sandt JJM. Development of a QSAR for worst case estimates of acute toxicity of chemically reactive compounds. Toxicol Lett. 2007; 170(3): 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.03.008
- Yang SY, Maeng SH, Lee JY, Lee YM, Chung HK, Chung HW, et al. Comparison of QSAR mutagenicity prediction data with Ames test results. Environmental Mutagens & Carcinogens. 2000; 20(1): 21-25.
- Cariello NF, Wilson JD, Britt BH, Wedd DJ, Burlinson B, Gombar V. Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity. Mutagenesis. 2002; 17(4): 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/17.4.321
- Mombelli E. An evaluation of the predictive ability of the QSAR software packages, DEREK, HAXARDEXPERT and TOPKAT, to describe chemically- induced skin irritation. Altern Lab Anim. 2008; 36(1): 15-24.
- Devillers J, Mombelli E. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2010; 21(7-8): 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2010.528959
- TOPKAT in Discovery Studio 3.0. Theory-Toxicity Prediction(Extensible) Overview. Available: http://accelrys.com/products/discovery-studio/qsar-admetand-predictive-toxicology.html [accessed 28 June 2013]
- EPA. OncologicTM, Software. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/sf/pubs/oncologic.htm [accessed 28 June 2013]
- IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Available: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/index.php [accessed 20 July 2013].
- OECD. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 471: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. Paris: OECD Press; 1997.
- OECD. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 473: In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test. Paris: OECD Press; 1997.
- OECD. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 474: Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test. Paris: OECD Press; 1997.
- OECD. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 476: In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test. Paris: OECD Press; 1997.
- ECHA(European CHemicals Agency). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. Available: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf [accessed 05 November 2013].
- Weed DL. Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Method. Risk Anal. 2005; 25(6): 1545-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00699.x
- European CHemicals Agency. Registered Substances. Available: http://echa.europa.eu/informationon-chemicals/registered-substances [accessed 28 June 2013].
- US National Library of Medicine. TOXNET(Toxicology Data Network). Available: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/ [accessed 12 June 2013].
- Koski WS, Roszak S, Kaufman JJ, Balasubramanian K. Potential toxicity of CF3X halocarbons. In Vitro Toxicology. 1997; 10(4): 455-457.
- Devillers J, Mombelli E, Samsera R. Structural alerts for estimating the carcinogenicity of pesticides and biocides. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2011; 22(1-2): 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2010.548349