DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is There a Role for a Needle Thoracoscopic Pleural Biopsy under Local Anesthesia for Pleural Effusions?

  • Son, Ho Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Sung Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Darlong, Laleng Mawia (Thoracic Surgery & Thoracic Surgical Oncology Clinic, Fortis-Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Jae Seong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Sun, Kyung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Taik (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hee Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Kanghoon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Seung Hun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jong Tae (Korea Artificial Organ Center, Korea University)
  • Received : 2013.08.08
  • Accepted : 2013.10.15
  • Published : 2014.04.05

Abstract

Background: A closed pleural biopsy is commonly performed for diagnosing patients exhibiting pleural effusion if prior thoracentesis is not diagnostic. However, the diagnostic yield of such biopsies is unsatisfactory. Instead, a thoracoscopic pleural biopsy is more useful and less painful. Methods: We compared the diagnostic yield of needle thoracoscopic pleural biopsy performed under local anesthesia with that of closed pleural biopsy. Sixty-seven patients with pleural effusion were randomized into groups A and B. Group A patients were subjected to closed pleural biopsies, and group B patients were subjected to pleural biopsies performed using needle thoracoscopy under local anesthesia. Results: The diagnostic yields and complication rates of the two groups were compared. The diagnostic yield was 55.6% in group A and 93.5% in group B (p<0.05). Procedure-related complications developed in seven group A patients but not in any group B patients. Of the seven complications, five were pneumothorax and two were vasovagal syncope. Conclusion: Needle thoracoscopic pleural biopsy under local anesthesia is a simple and safe procedure that has a high diagnostic yield. This procedure is recommended as a useful diagnostic modality if prior thoracentesis is non-diagnostic.

Keywords

References

  1. Prakash UB, Reiman HM. Comparison of needle biopsy with cytologic analysis for the evaluation of pleural effusion: analysis of 414 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1985;60:158-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60212-2
  2. Harris RJ, Kavuru MS, Mehta AC, et al. The impact of thoracoscopy on the management of pleural disease. Chest 1995;107:845-52. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.107.3.845
  3. Loddenkemper R. Thoracoscopy: results in non cancerous and idiopathic pleural effusions. Poumon Coeur 1981;37:261-4.
  4. Silvestri GA, Strange C. Rest in peace: the decline in training and use of the closed pleural biopsy. J Bronchology 2005;12:131-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.lab.0000153627.32248.7b
  5. The American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society. Pretreatment evaluation of non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:320-32. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.ats156.1
  6. Nusair S, Breuer R, Amir G, Berkman N. Closed pleural needle biopsy: predicting diagnostic yield by examining pleural fluid parameters. Respir Med 2002;96:890-4. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2002.1379
  7. Frank W. Current diagnostic approach to pleural effusion. Pneumologie 2004;58:777-90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-830084
  8. Ahrar K, Wallace M, Javadi S, Gupta S. Mediastinal, hilar, and pleural image-guided biopsy: current practice and techniques. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2008;29:350-60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1081279
  9. Rahman NM, Gleeson FV. Image-guided pleural biopsy. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2008;14:331-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0b013e3282fe9a04
  10. Chakrabarti B, Ryland I, Sheard J, Warburton CJ, Earis JE. The role of Abrams percutaneous pleural biopsy in the investigation of exudative pleural effusions. Chest 2006;129:1549-55. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1549
  11. Baumann MH. Closed pleural biopsy: not dead yet! Chest 2006;129:1398-400. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1398
  12. Greillier L, Cavailles A, Fraticelli A, et al. Accuracy of pleural biopsy using thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of histologic subtype in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer 2007;110:2248-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23034
  13. Canto A, Blasco E, Casillas M, et al. Thoracoscopy in the diagnosis of pleural effusion. Thorax 1977;32:550-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.32.5.550
  14. De Camp PT, Moseley PW, Scott ML, Hatch HB Jr. Diagnostic thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1973;16:79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)65814-6
  15. Page RD, Jeffrey RR, Donnelly RJ. Thoracoscopy: a review of 121 consecutive surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:66-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(89)90179-3
  16. Petrakis I, Katsamouris A, Drossitis I, Chalkiadakis G. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of chest diseases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999;9:409-13.
  17. Janssen JP, Thunnissen F, Visser F. Comparison of the 2.0 mm and the 3.5 mm minithoracoscopy set to standard equipment for medical thoracoscopy. Eur Respir J 2003;22(suppl 45):S451.
  18. Ferrer JS, Munoz XG, Orriols RM, Light RW, Morell FB. Evolution of idiopathic pleural effusion: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Chest 1996;109:1508-13. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.6.1508
  19. Janssen JP, Ramlal S, Mravunac M. The long-term follow-up of exudative pleural effusion after nondiagnostic thoracoscopy. J Bronchol 2004;11:169-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.lab.0000131024.20254.81
  20. Venekamp LN, Velkeniers B, Noppen M. Does 'idiopathic pleuritis' exist? Natural history of non-specific pleuritis diagnosed after thoracoscopy. Respiration 2005;72:74-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083404

Cited by

  1. Pleural biopsies in undiagnosed pleural effusions; Abrams vs image-guided vs thoracoscopic biopsies vol.22, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000258
  2. Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion vol.43, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562016000000323
  3. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma vol.55, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00953-2019
  4. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma vol.58, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158