DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of static mixer geometry on flow mixing and pressure drop in marine SCR applications

  • Park, Taewha (Graduate Program, School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Sung, Yonmo (Graduate Program, School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Taekyung (Graduate Program, School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Inwon (Global Core Research Center for Ships and Offshore Plants, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Gyungmin (Pusan Clean Coal Center, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Duckjool (Pusan Clean Coal Center, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2014.03.31

초록

Flow mixing and pressure drop characteristics for marine selective catalytic reduction applications were investigated numerically to develop an efficient static mixer. Two different mixers, line- and swirl-type, were considered. The effect of vane angles on the relative intensity, uniformity index, and pressure drop was investigated in a swirl-type mixer; these parameters are dramatically affected by the mixer geometry. The presence of a mixer, regardless of the mixer type, led to an improvement of approximately 20% in the mixing performance behind the mixer in comparison to not having a mixer. In particular, there was a tradeoff relationship between the uniformity and the pressure drop. Considering the mixing performance and the pressure drop, the swirl-type mixer was more suitable than the line-type mixer in this study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Battoei, M., Doroudian, M. and Lacin, F., 2006. Optimization of exhaust gas distribution on the catalytic converter inletcone diffuser using advanced shape deformation technology, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-1439, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  2. Birkhold, F., Meingast, U., Wassermann, P. and Deutschmann, O., 2007. Modeling and simulation of the injection of ureawater- solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-systems. Applied Catalysis B : Environmental, 70, pp.119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.12.035
  3. Bressler, H., Rammoser, D., Neumaier, H. and Terres, F., 1996. Experimental and predictive investigation of a close coupled catalytic converter with pulsating flow, SAE Technical Paper, 960564, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  4. Chen, M. and Williams, S., 2005. Modelling and optimization of SCR-exhaust aftertreatment systems. SAE Technical Paper, 2005-01-0969, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  5. Chen, M., Aleixo, J., Williams, S., Leprince, T. and Yong, Y., 2004. CFD modeling of 3-way catalytic converters with detailed catalytic surface reaction mechanism. SAE Technical Paper, 2004-01-0148, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  6. DieselNet, 2008. Emission Standards, IMO Marine Engine Regulations. [online] Available at: [Accessed March 2013].
  7. Fluent, 2007. Fluent 6.3 User's Guide. Lebanon: ANSYS Inc.
  8. Girard, J. W., Lacin, F., Hass, C.J. and Hodonsky, J., 2006. Flow uniformity optimization for diesel aftertreatment systems, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-1092, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  9. Jeong, S.J., Lee, S.J., Kim, W.S. and Lee, C.B., 2005. Simulation on the optimization shape and location of urea injecttion for urea-SCR system of heavy-duty diesel engine to prevent $NH_{3}$ slip, SAE Technical Paper, 2005-01-3886, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  10. Larmi, M. and Tiainen, J., 2003. Diesel spray simulation and KH-RT wave model, SAE Technical Paper, 2003-01-3231, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  11. Munnannur, A. and Liu, Z. G., 2010. Development and validation of a predictive model for DEF injection and urea decomposition in model SCR deNOx systems, SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-0889, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  12. Nguyen, T.D.B., Lim, Y.I., Eom, W.H., Kim, S.J. and Yoo, K.S., 2010. Experimental and CFD simulation of hybrid SNCR-SCR using urea solution in a pilot-scale reactor. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 34(10), pp.1580-1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.12.012
  13. NMRI, 2011. National Maritime Research Institute 2011. [online] Available at: [Accessed November 2013].
  14. Regner, M., Ostergren, K. and Tragardh, C., 2006. Effect of geometry and flow rate on secondary flow and the mixing process in static mixers-A numerical study. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(18), pp.6133-6141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.05.044
  15. Thakur, R.K., Vial, Ch., Nigam, K.D.P., Nauman, E.B. and Djelveh, G., 2003. Static mixers in the process industries-A review. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 81(7), pp.787-826. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603322302968
  16. Turns, S.R., 2000. An Introduction to combustion: concept and applications. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  17. Weltens, H., Bressler, H., Terres, F., Neumaier, H. and Rammoser, D., 1993. Optimization of catalytic converter gas flow distributions by CFD prediction, SAE Technical Paper, 930780, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  18. Zhang, X. and Romzek, M., 2007. 3-D numerical study of flow mixing in front of SCR for different injection systems, SAE Technical Paper, 2007-01-1578, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  19. Zhang X., Romzek, M. and Morgan, C., 2006. 3-D numerical study of mixing characteristics of NH3 in front of SCR, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-3444, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  20. Zheng, G., Fila, A., Kotrba A. and Floyd, R., 2010. Investigation of urea deposits in urea SCR systems for medium and heavy duty trucks, SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-1941, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.
  21. Zheng, G., Palmer, G., Salanta G. and Kotrba, A., 2009. Mixer development for urea SCR application, SAE Technical Paper, 2009-01-2879, Pennsylvania: 4 SAE International.