DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Incidence of Stroke by Socioeconomic Status, Age, Sex, and Stroke Subtype: A Nationwide Study in Korea

  • Seo, Su Ra (Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Su Young (Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yi (Department of Health Policy and Management, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Tae-Ho (Department of Preventive Medicine, Busan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Hyung-Geun (Department of Health Policy and Management, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung Eun (Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Woung (Department of Preventive Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2013.12.11
  • Accepted : 2014.03.14
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

Objectives: To date, studies have not comprehensively demonstrated the relationship between stroke incidence and socioeconomic status. This study investigated stroke incidence by household income level in conjunction with age, sex, and stroke subtype in Korea. Methods: Contributions by the head of household were used as the basis for income levels. Household income levels for 21 766 036 people were classified into 6 groups. The stroke incidences were calculated by household income level, both overall within income categories and further by age group, sex, and stroke subtype. To present the inequalities among the six ranked groups in a single value, the slope index of inequality and relative index of inequality were calculated. Results: In 2005, 57 690 people were first-time stroke patients. The incidences of total stroke for males and females increased as the income level decreased. The incidences of stroke increased as the income level decreased in those 74 years old and under, whereas there was no difference by income levels in those 75 and over. Intracerebral hemorrhage for the males represented the highest inequality among stroke subtypes. Incidences of subarachnoid hemorrhage did not differ by income levels. Conclusions: The incidence of stroke increases as the income level decreases, but it differs according to sex, age, and stroke subtype. The difference in the relative incidence is large for male intracerebral hemorrhage, whereas the difference in the absolute incidence is large for male ischemic stroke.

Keywords

References

  1. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol 2006;13(6):581-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01138.x
  2. Song IH, Oh DH, Kang HS, Choue CW, Kim KS, Kim MS, et al. Changing pattern of stroke during the recent 10 years in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 1992;43(5):637-644 (Korean).
  3. Granger CV, Sherwood CC, Greer DS. Functional status mea sures in a comprehensive stroke care program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977;58(12):555-561.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-specific mortality from stroke and distribution of place of death-United States 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51(20):429-433.
  5. Van Rossum CT, van de Mheen H, Breteler MM, Grobbee DE, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic differences in stroke among Dutch elderly women: the Rotterdam study. Stroke 1999;30(2):357-362. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.2.357
  6. Hart CL, Hole DJ, Smith GD. The contribution of risk factors to stroke differentials, by socioeconomic position in adulthood: the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Public Health 2000;90(11): 1788-1791. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.11.1788
  7. Peltonen M, Rosen M, Lundberg V, Asplund K. Social patterning of myocardial infarction and stroke in Sweden: incidence and survival. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151(3):283-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010204
  8. Engstrom G, Jerntorp I, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Hedblad B, Berglund G, Janzon L. Geographic distribution of stroke incidence within an urban population: relations to socioeconomic circumstances and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Stroke 2001;32(5):1098-1103. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.5.1098
  9. Jakovljevic D, Sarti C, Sivenius J, Torppa J, Mahonen M, Immonen- Raiha P, et al. Socioeconomic status and ischemic stroke: the FINMONICA Stroke Register. Stroke 2001;32(7):1492-1498. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1492
  10. Jakovljevic D, Sarti C, Sivenius J, Torppa J, Mahonen M, Immonen- Raiha P, et al. Socioeconomic differences in the incidence, mortality and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage in Finnish adult population. The FINMONICA Stroke Register. Neuroepidemiology 2001;20(20):85-90. https://doi.org/10.1159/000054765
  11. Jakovljevic D, Sivenius J, Sarti C, Torppa J, Mahonen M, Immonen- Raiha P, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence, mortality and prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage: the FINMONICA Stroke Register. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;12(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047674
  12. Wolfe CD, Rudd AG, Howard R, Coshall C, Stewart J, Lawrence E, et al. Incidence and case fatality rates of stroke subtypes in a multiethnic population: the South London Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72(2):211-216. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.2.211
  13. Gillum RF, Mussolino ME. Education, poverty, and stroke incidence in whites and blacks: the NHANES I epidemiologic follow- up study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56(2):188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00535-8
  14. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Saad M, Hopkins LN. Educational attainment and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction. Med Sci Monit 2003;9(11):466-473.
  15. Avendano M, Kawachi I, Van Lenthe F, Boshuizen HC, Mackenbach JP, Van den Bos GA, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence in the US elderly: the role of risk factors in the EPESE study. Stroke 2006;37(6):1368-1373. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000221702.75002.66
  16. Lisabeth LD, Diez Roux AV, Escobar JD, Smith MA, Morgenstern LB. Neighborhood environment and risk of ischemic stroke: the brain attack surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165(3):279-287.
  17. Kuper H, Adami HO, Theorell T, Weiderpass E. The socioeconomic gradient in the incidence of stroke: a prospective study in middle-aged women in Sweden. Stroke 2007;38(1):27-33. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000251805.47370.91
  18. Avendano M, Glymour MM. Stroke disparities in older Americans: is wealth a more powerful indicator of risk than income and education? Stroke 2008;39(5):1533-1540. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490383
  19. Li C, Hedblad B, Rosvall M, Buchwald F, Khan FA, Engstrom G. Stroke incidence, recurrence, and case-fatality in relation to socioeconomic position: a population-based study of middleaged Swedish men and women. Stroke 2008;39(8):2191-2196. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507756
  20. Cesaroni G, Agabiti N, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Socioeconomic differences in stroke incidence and prognosis under a universal healthcare system. Stroke 2009;40(8):2812-2819. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542944
  21. Grimaud O, Dufouil C, Alperovitch A, Pico F, Ritchie K, Helmer C, et al. Incidence of ischaemic stroke according to income level among older people: the 3C study. Age Ageing 2011;40(1):116-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq142
  22. National Health Insurance Service. NHI Program: population coverage [cited 2014 Feb 26]. Available from: http://www.nhis.or.kr/static/html/wbd/g/a/wbdga0403.html.
  23. Machenbach JP, Kunst AE. Measuring the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med 1997;44(6):757-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00073-1
  24. Park BH, Jung M, Lee TJ. Associations of income and wealth with health status in the Korean elderly. J Prev Med Public Health 2009;42(5):275-282. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.5.275
  25. Jung Y, Cho Y, Oh J. Differential effects of family income on self-rated health by age: analysis of Seoul citizens health indicators survey 2001, 2005. J Prev Med Public Health 2007;40(5): 381-387 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.5.381
  26. Khang YH, Lynch JW, Yun S, Lee SI. Trends in socioeconomic health inequalities in Korea: use of mortality and morbidity measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(4):308-314. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.012989
  27. Khang YH, Yun SC, Hwang IA, Lee MS, Lee SI, Jo MW, et al. Changes in mortality inequality in relation to the Korean economic crisis: use of area-based socioeconomic position. J Prev Med Public Health 2005;38(3):359-365 (Korean).
  28. Khang YH, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Health inequalities in Korea: age- and sex-specific educational differences in the 10 leading causes of death. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33(2):299-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg244
  29. Kim CW, Lee SY, Moon OR. Inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality across income groups and policy implications in Korea. Public Health 2008;122(3):229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2007.07.003
  30. Park JK, Kim KS, Kim CB, Lee TY, Lee KS, Lee DH, et al. The accuracy of ICD codes for cerebrovascular diseases in medical insurance claims. Korean J Prev Med 2000;33(1):76-82 (Korean).

Cited by

  1. Carotid Plaque Morphology Is Significantly Associated With Sex, Age, and History of Neurological Symptoms vol.46, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.010558
  2. Promoter Polymorphism (−174, G/C) of Interleukin-6 and Arterial Thromboembolic Events: A Meta-Analysis vol.22, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.901467
  3. The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Lifestyle Health Determinants Among Older Adults Living in the Mediterranean Region: The Multinational MEDIS Study (2005-2015) vol.50, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.101
  4. Temporal trends in educational inequalities in non-communicable diseases in Korea, 2007-2015 vol.12, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190143
  5. Association between polymorphism of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase(ALK) gene and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage vol.4, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.20465/kiots.2018.4.2.021
  6. Is androgen deprivation therapy associated with cerebral infarction in patients with prostate cancer? A Korean nationwide population‐based propensity score matching study vol.8, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2325
  7. Factors influencing return to work after stroke: the Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation (KOSCO) Study vol.9, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028673
  8. Measurement of Socioeconomic Position in Research on Cardiovascular Health Disparities in Korea: A Systematic Review vol.52, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.19.094
  9. Effects of socioeconomic status on risk of ischemic stroke: a case-control study in the Guangzhou population vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6998-4
  10. Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0 vol.17, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093031
  11. Association between socioeconomic status and incident stroke in China vol.74, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213515
  12. Lifetime risks and health impacts of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke in South Korea vol.10, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71439-3
  13. The Contribution of Material, Behavioral, Psychological, and Social-Relational Factors to Income-Related Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Among Older Adults vol.36, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/jcn.0000000000000808
  14. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Korea vol.3, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2021.01008
  15. Sex-based differences in and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in adults aged 40 years and above in Northeast China: Results from the cross-sectional China national stroke screening survey vol.11, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038671
  16. Korea Heart Disease Fact Sheet 2020: Analysis of Nationwide Data vol.51, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0097
  17. Socioeconomic status and lifestyle in young ischaemic stroke patients: a possible relationship to stroke recovery and risk of recurrent event vol.29, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a6697
  18. Risk of major bleeding by ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation among 488,107 people in primary care: a cohort study vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01993-9