DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Radiation Exposure of Radiographer Related to the Location in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions

  • Chang, Young Jae (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ah Na (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Oh, In Su (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Woo, Nam Sik (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Hae Kyoung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jae Hun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.29
  • 심사 : 2013.12.20
  • 발행 : 2014.04.01

초록

Background: Although a physician may be the nearest to the radiation source during C-arm fluoroscope-guided interventions, the radiographer is also near the fluoroscope. We prospectively investigated the radiation exposure of radiographers relative to their location. Methods: The effective dose (ED) was measured with a digital dosimeter on the radiographers' left chest and the side of the table. We observed the location of the radiographers in each procedure related to the mobile support structure of the fluoroscope (Groups A, M and P). Data about age, height, weight, sex, exposure time, radiation absorbed dose (RAD), and the ED at the radiographer's chest and the side of the table was collected. Results: There were 51 cases for Group A, 116 cases for Group M and 144 cases for Group P. No significant differences were noted in the demographic data such as age, height, weight, and male to female ratio, and exposure time, RAD and ED at the side of the table. Group P had the lowest ED ($0.5{\pm}0.8{\mu}Sv$) of all the groups (Group A, $1.6{\pm}2.3{\mu}Sv$; Group M, $1.3{\pm}1.9{\mu}Sv$; P < 0.001). The ED ratio (ED on the radiographer's chest/ED at the side of the table) of Group A was the highest, and the ED radio of Group P was the lowest of all the groups (Group A, $12.2{\pm}21.5%$; Group M, $5.7{\pm}6.5%$; Group P, $2.5{\pm}6.7%$; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Radiographers can easily reduce their radiation exposure by changing their position. Two steps behind the mobile support structure can effectively decrease the exposure of radiographers by about 80%.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek SW, Ryu JS, Jung CH, Lee JH, Kwon WK, Woo NS, et al. A randomized controlled trial about the levels of radiation exposure depends on the use of collimation C-arm fluoroscopic-guided medial branch block. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 148-53. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.148
  2. Ryu JS, Baek SW, Jung CH, Cho SJ, Jung EG, Kim HK, et al. The survey about the degree of damage of radiation-protective shields in operation room. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 142-7. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142
  3. Fish DE, Kim A, Ornelas C, Song S, Pangarkar S. The risk of radiation exposure to the eyes of the interventional pain physician. Radiol Res Pract 2011; 2011: 609537.
  4. Botwin KP, Freeman ED, Gruber RD, Torres-Rames FM, Bouchtas CG, Sanelli JT, et al. Radiation exposure to the physician performing fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2001; 4: 343-8.
  5. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Moss TL, Pampati V. Radiation exposure to the physician in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2002; 5: 385-93.
  6. Jung CH, Ryu JS, Baek SW, Oh JH, Woo NS, Kim HK, et al. Radiation exposure of the hand and chest during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 51-6. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.51
  7. Cho JH, Kim JY, Kang JE, Park PE, Kim JH, Lim JA, et al. A study to compare the radiation absorbed dose of the C-arm fluoroscopic modes. Korean J Pain 2011; 24: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.199
  8. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (US). Occupational dose limits. In: NCRP Report No. 116. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. Bethesda (MD), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 1993, pp 33-5.
  9. Park PE, Park JM, Kang JE, Cho JH, Cho SJ, Kim JH, et al. Radiation safety and education in the applicants of the final test for the expert of pain medicine. Korean J Pain 2012; 25: 16-21. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.1.16
  10. Fink GE. Radiation safety in fluoroscopy for neuraxial injections. AANA J 2009; 77: 265-9.
  11. Little MP. Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model? Mutat Res 2010; 687: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.01.008
  12. Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e1166-73. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/25026140
  13. Hendee WR, O'Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 2012; 264: 312-21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112678
  14. Crawley MT, Shine B, Booth A. Radiation dose and diagnosticity of barium enema examinations by radiographers and radiologists: a comparative study. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659133
  15. Tilson ER. Educational and experiential effects on radio-graphers' radiation safety behavior. Radiol Technol 1982; 53: 321-5.
  16. Johnston J, Killion JB, Veale B, Comello R. U.S. Technologists' radiation exposure perceptions and practices. Radiol Technol 2011; 82: 311-20.
  17. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Prieto C, Guibelalde E. Influence of patient thickness and operation modes on occupational and patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006; 118: 325-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci369
  18. Ghobadifar MA, Zarei S. Effect of collimation on radiation exposure and image quality. Korean J Pain 2013; 26: 307-8. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.3.307
  19. Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G, Balter S, Dixon R, Padovani R, et al. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radio- logy: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33: 230-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9756-7
  20. Schueler BA. Operator shielding: how and why. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 13: 167-71. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2010.03.005

피인용 문헌

  1. Three principles for radiation safety: time, distance, and shielding vol.31, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.3.145
  2. RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING SPINE SURGERY USING C-ARM FLUOROSCOPY vol.27, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192701172722
  3. C-Arm 장비의 사용 시 시술자의 피폭선량 저 감화 방법 연구 vol.39, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17946/jrst.2016.39.4.02
  4. Radiation exposure and protection for eyes in pain management vol.12, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2017.12.4.297