DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Difference between the Stated Preference and the Revealed Preference before/after the High-speed Rail Service in Korea

  • Lee, Jang-Ho (Department of Railroad Facility Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

The Korean high-speed rail (HSR) began its commercial service in 2004. This service has been created significant changes in the system of intercity passenger travels of Korea. However, the actual ridership was approximately half of the estimated one in the planning stage. In this background, this paper presents the difference between the stated preference (SP) before the HSR service and the revealed preference (RP) after it using the intercity travel mode choice models. Several meaningful differences are found in terms of the factors affecting the travel mode choice, the estimation results of model, the monetary values of time, and elasticities. While the access/egress travel time of high-speed rail is less important than in-vehicle travel time in the SP sample, they have same weight in the RP sample. Also the RP models show that the probability of choosing HSR can be decreased by the increase of the number of vehicles in household contrary to the results from the SP models. The monetary values of travel time are relatively high and the direct and cross elasticities in response to changes in level-of-service of HSR are relatively low in the RP sample. This Korean case is expected to offer referable material for preparing high-speed rail services in other countries by showing the difference between the SP and RP before/after the actual service, identifying the importance of access/egress travel time and lower direct elasticities of HSR demand.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Railroad Corporation. (2012). "Statistical Yearbook of Railroad 2012."
  2. Lee, J. and Chang, J. S. (2006). "Effects of High-Speed Rail Service on Shares of Intercity Passenger Ridership in South Korea", Transportation Research Record, No. 1943, pp.31-42.
  3. Louviere, J., Hensher, D. A., and Swait, J. (2000). "Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application," Cambridge University Press.
  4. Hensher, D. A. and Bradley, M. (1993). "Using Stated Response Choice Data to Enrich Revealed Preference Discrete Choice Models," Marketing Letters, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072
  5. Hensher, D. A. (1997). "A Practical Approach to Identifying the Market Potential for High-speed Rail: A Case Study in the Sydney-Canberra corridor," Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 431-446.
  6. Burge, P., Kim, C.W., and Rohr, C. (2011). "Modeling Demand for Long-Distance Travel in Great Britain: Stated Preference Survey to support the modeling of demand for high-speed rail," RAND http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2011/RAND_TR899.sum.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2013.
  7. Lee, J., Chon, K. S., and Park, C. (2004). "Accommodating Heterogeneity and Heteroscedasticity in Intercity Travel Mode Choice Model: Formulation and Application to HoNam, South Korea, High-Speed Rail Demand Analysis," Transportation Research Record, No. 1898, pp. 69-78.
  8. Park, Y. and Ha, H. (2006). "Analysis of the Impact of Highspeed Railroad Service on Air Transport Demand," Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.003
  9. Chou, H. and Fu, C. (2007). "A Study for Domestic Air Passenger's Preference for High-Speed Rail Mode in Taiwan," The Journal of Global Business Management, Vol. 3, No.2.
  10. Willigers, J. and Wee, B. V. (2010). "High-speed Rail and Office Location Choices: A Stated Choice Experiment for the Netherlands," Journal of Transport Geography.
  11. Outwater, M., Tierney, K., Bradley, M., Sall, E., Kuppamm, A., and Modugula, V. (2010). "California Statewide Model for High-Speed Rail," Journal of Choice Modeling, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.58-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70029-0
  12. TEMS Inc. (2008). "Market Assessment of High Speed Rail Service in the Calgary-Edmonton Corridor."
  13. ATKINS (2012). "Norway High Speed Rail Assessment Study: Phase III Model Development Report."
  14. Hensher, D. A., and Button, K. (2000). "Handbook of Transport Modeling," Elsevier Science, pp. 5-6.
  15. Bhat, C. R. (1998). "Accommodating Variations in Responsiveness to Level of Service Measures in Travel Mode Choice Modeling," Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 32, pp. 495-507.
  16. Bhat, C. R. (2000). "Incorporating Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Urban Work Travel Mode Choice Modeling," Transportation Science, Vol. 34, pp. 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.34.2.228.12306
  17. Hensher, D.A. and Greene, W. (2000). "Choosing Between Conventional, Electric, UNG/LNG Vehicles in Single Vehicle Households," Technical paper, Institute of Transport Studies, University of Sydney, Australia.
  18. Walker, J. (2001). "Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables," Ph. D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  19. McFadden, D., and Train, K. (2000). "Mixed MNL models for Discrete Response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 447-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1
  20. Train, K. (2003). "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge University Press.
  21. Brownstone, D. and Train, K. (1999). "Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns," Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, pp. 228-239.
  22. Bhat, C. R. (2001). "Quasi-random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model," Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, pp. 677-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X
  23. Bhat, C. R. (2002). "Simulation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences," The 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (CD-ROM).
  24. The Korean Society of Transportation (2002). "Research and Study for the HoNam High Speed Rail Basic Construction Plan: Route and Station Selection - Survey Report."
  25. The Korea Transport Institute (2012), "A Study for Upgrading Assessment System of Railway Facility Investment (4th Ed.)," Korea Railway Network Authority.