DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Molecular phylogenetic study of section Sabina (Genus Juniperus) in Korea based on chloroplast DNA matK and psbA-trnH sequences data

엽록체 DNA matK와 psbA-trnH 염기서열에 기초한 한국산 향나무절(향나무속) 식물의 분자계통학적 연구

  • 홍정기 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과) ;
  • 양종철 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과) ;
  • 오승환 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과) ;
  • 이유미 (국립수목원 산림생물조사과)
  • Received : 2013.12.31
  • Accepted : 2014.03.11
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

This study aims to define the phylogenetic relationship within Korean section sabina and find molecular markers which resolve the phylogenetic relationship in genus Juniperus and section sabina. cpDNA matK and psbA-trnH were used as molecular markers. The combined analyses of two genes suggested that section sabina was a clade supported by 100% BP. The relationships of [J. chinensis var. sargentii+J. davurica] clade and [J. chinensis var. chinensis+J. chinensis var. procumbens+J. chinensis var. horizontalis] clade were supported by 91% BP and 100% BP, respectively. Thus, the classification of Korean section sabina would be appropriate at follows, (1) J. chinensis var. sargentii+J. davurica, and (2) J. chinensis var. chinensis+J. chinensis var. procumbens According to the results of separate analyses, matK seems to work better resolving power to clarify the phylogenetic ambiguity in Juniperus and section sabina than psbA-trnH.

한국산 향나무절 식물에 대한 계통학적 유연관계를 규명하고, 더불어 향나무속 및 향나무절의 계통 및 유연관계를 잘 나타낼 수 있는 분자마커를 찾아내고자 분자계통학적 연구를 수행하였다. 엽록체 DNA matK와 psbA-trnH를 분자마커로 활용하였으며, 두 유전자의 조합분석결과 향나무절이 100%의 BP로 지지되는 분계조를 이루었다. 눈향나무+단천향나무 분계조와 향나무+섬향나무+뚝향나무 분계조는 각각 91%, 100%의 BP로 지지되었다. 따라서 한국산 향나무절은 (1) 눈향나무+단천향나무, (2) 향나무+섬향나무+뚝향나무 두 개의 분계조로 구분하는 것이 가장 적합할 것으로 생각되고, 본 연구에서 이용된 두 개의 분자마커 중 matK가 psbA-trnH 보다 향나무속 및 향나무절의 계통 및 유연관계를 규명하는데 다소 높은 해상력을 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, R. P. 1999. Systematics of multi-seeded eastern hemisphere Juniperus based on leaf essential oils and RAPD DNA fingerprinting. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 27: 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(99)00016-2
  2. Adams, R. P., C.-F. Hsieh, J. Murata and R. N. Pandey. 2002. Systematics of Juniperus from eastern Asia based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 30: 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(01)00087-4
  3. Adams, R. P. and A. E. Schwarzbach. 2012. Taxonomy of the multi-seeded, entire leaf taxa of the Juniperus, section Sabina: sequence analysis of nrDNA and four cp DNA regions. Phytologia 94: 350-366.
  4. CBOL Plant Working Group. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. PNAS 106: 12794-12797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106
  5. Chung, J. M., S. W. Son, S. Y. Kim, G. W. Park and S. S. Kim. 2013a. Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation in the endangered Primula farinosa subsp. modesta, a subalpine endemic to Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 43: 236-243. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2013.43.3.236
  6. Chung, M. Y., J. M. Chung, J. Lopez-Pujol, S. J. Park and M. G. Chung. 2013b. Genetic diversity in three species of Forythia(Oleaceae) endemic to Korea: Implications for population history. taxonomy and conservation. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 47: 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.11.005
  7. Chung, T. H. 1943. Illustrated manual of Korean trees and shrubs. Chosen Natural History Museum Society, Seoul, Korea. Pp. 12-15.
  8. Farjon, A. 2005. A Monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK. Pp. 228-400.
  9. Fu, L., Y. Yu. and A. Farjon. 1999. Flora of China. Vol. 4. Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. Pp. 62-77.
  10. Huh, M. K. and H. W. Huh. 2000. Genetic diversity and population structure of Juniperus rigida (Cupressaceae) and Juniperus coreana. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 86-98.
  11. Kim, S. I. 1988. Taxonomic studies of Genus Juniperus. Journal of Korean Forest Society 77: 338-350.
  12. Kim, Y. D., H. S. Cho, and G. C. Choo. 1997. A Palynotaxonomic Study of the Family Cupressaceae in Korea. Journal of Agricultural Technology Research Institute. Chinju National University 10: 135-147.
  13. Korea National Arboretum and The Plant Taxonomic Society of Korea. 2007. A Synonymic List of Vascular Plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon. Pp. 26. (in Korean)
  14. Lee, T. B. 1979. Illustrated flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa. Seoul. Pp. 149. (in Korean)
  15. Little, D. P. 2006. Evolution and circumscription of the true Cypresses (Cupressaceae: Cupressus). Systematic Botany 31: 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364406778388638
  16. Mao, K., G. Hao, J. Liu, R. P. Adams and R. I. Milne. 2010. Diversification and biogeography of Juniperus (Cupressaceae): variable diversification rates and multiple intercontinental dispersals. New Phytologist 188: 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03351.x
  17. Ohwi J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 118.
  18. Park, W. J. 1986. Study on Karyotype of Genus Juniperus. MS Thesis. Konkuk University. (in Korean)
  19. Shin, H. U. 2010. The DNA barcoding study of Korean gymnosperms. MS Thesis. Korea University. (in Korean)
  20. Shin, J. G. 2013. Population distribution, community ecology and genetic diversity of nature Juniperus chinensis forest in South Korea. PhD Thesis. Kongju University. (in Korean)
  21. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony(* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
  22. Uyeki, H. 1926. Corean timber trees vol.1. Ginkgoales and Coniferae. The Forestry Experiment Station, Government General of Chosen 4: 1-154. (in Japanese)

Cited by

  1. Genetic Difference Analysis and Environmental Assessment of Miscanthus sinensis and Phragmites australis to Apply Regional Seed for Restoration in Korea vol.36, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2018.36.4.463
  2. Phylogenetic study of the Genus Suaeda(Chenopodiaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences from Korea vol.32, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.6.566
  3. 범용성 DNA 바코드 분석 기반 한국산 천남성속(Arisaema) 식물의 분자계통학적 연구 vol.31, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.1.037
  4. Comparative Analyses of Chloroplast Genomes From 14 Zanthoxylum Species: Identification of Variable DNA Markers and Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Genus vol.11, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.605793