Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Micro-CT evaluation of internal adaptation in resin fillings with different dentin adhesives

  • Han, Seung-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2013.10.25
  • Accepted : 2013.12.06
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of present study was to evaluate the internal adaptation of composite restorations using different adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Typical class I cavities were prepared in 32 human third molars. The teeth were divided into the following four groups: 3-step etch-and-rinse, 2-step etch-and-rinse, 2-step self-etch and 1-step self-etch system were used. After the dentin adhesives were applied, composite resins were filled and light-cured in two layers. Then, silver nitrate solution was infiltrated, and all of the samples were scanned by micro-CT before and after thermo-mechanical load cycling. For each image, the length to which silver nitrate infiltrated, as a percentage of the whole pulpal floor length, was calculated (%SP). To evaluate the internal adaptation using conventional method, the samples were cut into 3 pieces by two sectioning at an interval of 1 mm in the middle of the cavity and they were dyed with Rhodamine-B. The cross sections of the specimens were examined by stereomicroscope. The lengths of the parts where actual leakage was shown were measured and calculated as a percentage of real leakage (%RP). The values for %SP and %RP were compared. Results: After thermo-mechanical loading, all specimens showed significantly increased %SP compared to before thermo-mechanical loading and 1-step self-etch system had the highest %SP (p < 0.05). There was a tendency for %SP and %RP to show similar microleakage percentage depending on its sectioning. Conclusions: After thermo-mechanical load cycling, there were differences in internal adaptation among the groups using different adhesive systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Bausch JR, de Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, de Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90048-8
  2. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986;17:103-111.
  3. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002;15:279-289.
  4. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173-185.
  5. Heintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers-comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:259-267.
  6. Bouillaguet S, Duroux B, Ciucchi B, Sano H. Ability of adhesive systems to seal dentin surfaces: an in vitro study. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:201-208.
  7. Del-Nero MO, Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Analysis of sealing vs tensile bond strength of eight adhesive restorative material systems. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:117-127.
  8. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  9. De Santis R, Mollica F, Prisco D, Rengo S, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L. A 3D analysis of mechanically stressed dentin-adhesive-composite interfaces using X-ray micro-CT. Biomaterials 2005;26:257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.024
  10. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Cuijpers V, Frencken JE. Micro- CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo. Am J Dent 2008;21:393-397.
  11. Sun J, Eidelman N, Lin-Gibson S. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using X-ray micro-computed tomography to predict microleakage. Dent Mater 2009; 25:314-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.010
  12. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, Silikas N, Eliades G. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:272-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.020
  13. Zeiger DN, Sun J, Schumacher GE, Lin-Gibson S. Evaluation of dental composite shrinkage and leakage in extracted teeth using X-ray microcomputed tomography. Dent Mater 2009;25:1213-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.007
  14. Kwon OH, Park S. Evaluation of internal adaptation of dental adhesive restorations using Micro-CT. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:41-49. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.41
  15. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003;82:136-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200212
  16. Devarasa GM, Subba Reddy VV, Chaitra NL, Swarna YM. Self-etching adhesive on intact enamel, with and without pre-etching. Microsc Res Tech 2012;75:650-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.21106
  17. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are onestep adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:175-190.
  18. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PE, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:297-302.
  19. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent 2004;17:271-278.
  20. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790060601
  21. Shono Y, Terashita M, Shimada J, Kozono Y, Carvalho RM, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Durability of resin-dentin bonds. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:211-218.
  22. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001;80:1605-1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800070301
  23. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002;18:269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00048-3
  24. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Effect of mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. J Dent 1996;24:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00041-0
  25. Mitsui FH, Bedran-de-Castro AK, Ritter AV, Cardoso PE, Pimenta LA. Influence of load cycling on marginal microleakage with two self-etching and two onebottle dentin adhesive systems in dentin. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:209-216.
  26. Krejci I, Häusler T, Sägesser, Lutz F. New adhesives in Class V restorations under combined load and simulated dentinal fluid. Dent Mater 1994;10:331-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90042-6
  27. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, Petschelt A. Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentin bond with the use of different methods. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;67:712-721.
  28. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24:1-13. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.1
  29. Van Landuyt KL. Optimization of the chemical composition of dental adhesives: towards a simplified and durable, universal enamel/dentin adhesives. Thesis dissertation: KU Leuven; 2008.
  30. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2005;21:110-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
  31. Walter R, Swift EJ, Jr., Nagaoka H, Chung Y, Bartholomew W, Braswell KM, Pereira PN. Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2012;40:549-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.003
  32. Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002;4:255-269.
  33. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002;81:472-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100708
  34. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:183-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400214
  35. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
  36. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
  37. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001;26:97-104.
  38. Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008;33:79-88. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-42
  39. Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resindentin bonds. J Dent 2007;35:371-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.005
  40. Banomyong D, Palamara JE, Messer HH, Burrow MF. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116:571-578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00570.x

Cited by

  1. Effects of occlusal cavity configuration on 3D shrinkage vectors in a flowable composite pp.1436-3771, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2304-y
  2. Calcium hypochlorite as a dentin deproteinization agent: Microleakage, scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis vol.78, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22524
  3. Bonding Strategies of Resin Cement to Er, Cr:YSGG Lased Dentin: Micro-CT Evaluation and Microshear Bond Strength Testing vol.39, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000483
  4. Comparison of Internal Adaptation of Bulk-fill and Increment-fill Resin Composite Materials vol.44, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2341/17-269-L
  5. Micro-computed tomography in preventive and restorative dental research: A review vol.51, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20210087
  6. Tomographic Evaluation of the Internal Adaptation for Recent Calcium Silicate-Based Pulp Capping Materials in Primary Teeth vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5523145