DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions on Effects of 'Basic Inquiry' Units in Experimental Grade 3~4 Science Textbooks developed for 2009 Revised National Curriculum

2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 3~4학년 과학 교과용 도서 실험본의 '기초탐구' 단원의 효과에 대한 초등학교 교사의 인식

  • Received : 2013.12.19
  • Accepted : 2014.02.21
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

'Basic Inquiry' unit was newly included in the grade 3~4 science textbook developed for 2009 revised national curriculum. The unit deals with six basic inquiry skills such as 'observation', 'measurement', 'classification', 'prediction', 'inference', and 'communication'. This study investigated elementary school teachers' perceptions on the effects of 'Basic Inquiry' unit by questionnaires (N=104 for pre-survey, N=90 for post-survey). The results showed that how the teachers have taught basic inquiry skills before this new textbook and how they perceived the educational effects of the unit after experimental teaching period in three aspects; development of basic inquiry skills, facilitating science learning in other units, and implementation of open inquiry. The reasons of positive perceptions as well as negative perceptions were analyzed and discussed with the suggestions for further study.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D. & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
  2. Akerson, V. L. & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20159
  3. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  4. Bae, Y. B. (2008). The application of inquiry process skills in elementary science education. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 19(2), 89-102.
  5. Bass, J. E., Contant, T. L. & Carin, A. A. (2009). Teaching science as inquiry (11th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
  6. Chang, J.-A. & Jhun, Y. (2010). Development and application of open inquiry program: Focusing on the students' traits of science inquiring ability and repeated feedback. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(2), 207-218.
  7. Cho, H., Han, I.-K., Kim, H.-N. & Yang, I.-H. (2008). Analysis of elementary teachers' views on barriers in implementing inquiry-based instructions. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 901- 921.
  8. Choi, S.-Y. & Kang, H.-K. (2002). The comparative analysis of science process skills and teaching methods in the 6th and the 7th elementary school science curricula. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(4), 706-716.
  9. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S. & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. Go, G. S. (2009). Effect on science inquiry ability and free inquiry process of elementary student applying fundamental inquiry program. M.D. Thesis, Cheongju National University of Education.
  11. Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  12. Hodson, D. (1992). Redefining and reorienting practical work in school science. School Science Review, 73(264), 65-77.
  13. Jhun, Y. & Jeon, M. (2009a). The difficulty that is caused open inquiry instruction. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 20(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.20.1.200907.105
  14. Jhun, Y. & Jeon, M. (2009b). Contriving instruction strategy of open inquiry in elementary school and its application. Journal of the Society for the International Gifted in Science, 3(1), 67-74.
  15. Jin, S.-H. & Jang, S. (2007). Research articles: Elementary school teachers' teaching experience of scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(2), 181-191.
  16. Jung, H. & Jhun, Y. (2012). A comparative study on physics inquiry activities in science textbooks for primary school in Korea and Singapore. Journal Science Education, 36(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.1.139
  17. Kang, K. H. & Kim, J. M. (2010). Analysis of scientific inquiry process in 3rd, 4th and 7th grade science textbooks according to the 2007 revised national curriculum. Journal of the Society for the International Gifted in Science, 4(2), 97-107.
  18. Kang, Y. H. (2011). Analyis of basic inquiry ability of elementary school students for Seoqwipo gaet-kak columnar joint. M.D. Thesis, Jeju National University.
  19. Kim, C.-J., Chae, D. & Lim, C. S. (1999). Introduction to science education [과학교육학개론]. Seoul: Bookshill.
  20. Kim, D.-S. & Hong, S.-H. (2011). Comparative analysis of observing, predicting and inferring ability between the male and female groups of elementary school students for Seogwipo fossil formation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(2), 129-140.
  21. Kim, J.-Y. & Lim, H. (2011). Characteristics and problems in elementary school students' performance of open inquiry. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.2.535
  22. Kim, H., Park, B. & Lee, B. (2007). Focused on classification, prediction and reasoning = Analysis of the basic inquiry process in Korean science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(5), 499-508.
  23. Kim, M.-K. (2012). A comparison on scientific inquiry ability of elementary school students in 1994 and 2011. M.D. Thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  24. Kim, S., Cha, H. & Kim, J. (2005). Development of experimental modules using everyday life materials to enhance science process skills. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(7), 754-764.
  25. Lee, B., Park, B. & Kim, H. (2007a). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in Korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
  26. Lee, H. C. & Lee, J. H. (2010). The effect of the specific open- inquiry lesson on the elementary student's sciencerelated attitude, science process skill and the instructing teachers' cognition about open-inquiry. Journal Science Education, 34(2), 405-420. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2010.34.2.405
  27. Lee, H.-W., Yang, I.-H. & Cho, H.-J. (2005). Elementary and middle school students' understanding of observation, prediction, and hypothesis. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 236-241.
  28. Lee, K.-H., Jee, K.-J. & Park, J.-W. (2010). Investigation of elementary school teachers' recognition about open scientific inquiry. Teacher Education Research, 49(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.49.1.201004.71
  29. Lee, S.-G. (2011). The effects of using science notebooks in the open inquiry activities by cognitive levels. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(2), 242- 254.
  30. Lee, S. A., Jhun, Y., Hong, J.-E., Shin, Y.-J., Choi, J. & Lee, I. (2007b). Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  31. Lim, C.-S., Yoon, H.-G., Jang, M.-D., Lim, H., Shin, D.-H., Kim, M., Park, H.-W., Lee, I.-S., Kwon, C.-S., Lee, D.-H. & Kim, N.-I. (2007). Developing an innovative framework of grade 3-4 science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(5), 580-595.
  32. Martin, D. J. (1997). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Albany, NY: Delmar.
  33. Millar, R. & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559938
  34. Ministry of Education & Human Resources (2007). Science education curriculum [과학과 교육과정]. Ministry of Education & Human Resources, 2007-79.
  35. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Science education curriculum [과학과교육과정]. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2011-361.
  36. Na, M.-Y. (2009). Analysis of inquiry process element in science textbooks and empirical sequence of science process skills in elementary school. M.D. Thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  37. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  38. Park, K.-W. (2011). A comparative analysis on the science experiment lesson thinking process between elementary school beginning teachers and experienced teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 273-296.
  39. Shin, H.-H. & Kim, H.-N. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
  40. Yang, I., Kim, Y. & Lim, S. (2012). How do elementary school teachers teach prediction, inference, and hypothesis? Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 841-854. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.841
  41. Yeau, S.-H., Kim, H.-L. & Kim, M.-K. (2003). An analysis on scientific inquiry process in the elementary 5th grade science textbook published by 7th national curriculum and students' current abilities of scientific inquiry skill. Biology Education, 31(3), 214-223.
  42. Veermans, M., Lallimo, J. & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Patterns of guidance in inquiry learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 179-194.
  43. Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Cited by

  1. 초등학생의 전기회로 탐구능력에 대한 지식상태 분석 vol.35, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0857
  2. 통합탐구 단원에 대한 초등학교 교사들의 인식과 지도 실태 vol.36, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.5.0783
  3. 초등과학 생명현상 탐구를 위한 과학적 관찰 디지털 교재 개발 및 적용 vol.45, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.2.259