DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is Diffusion-Weighted MRI Useful for Differentiation of Small Non-Necrotic Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Head and Neck Malignancies?

  • Lim, Hyun Kyung (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Hyun (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Baek, Hye Jin (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Namkug (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hayoung (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jee Won (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang Yoon (Department of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Kyung Ja (Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Baek, Jung Hwan (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.06.07
  • Accepted : 2014.07.21
  • Published : 2014.12.01

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish benign from small, non-necrotic metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients with head and neck cancer underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (b value, 0 and $800s/mm^2$) preoperatively between January 2009 and December 2010. Two readers independently measured the ADC values of each cervical lymph node with a minimum-axial diameter of ${\geq}5$ mm but < 11 mm using manually drawn regions of interest. Necrotic lymph nodes were excluded. Mean ADC values were compared between benign and metastatic lymph nodes after correlating the pathology. Results: A total of 116 lymph nodes (91 benign and 25 metastatic) from 25 patients were included. Metastatic lymph nodes (mean ${\pm}$ standard deviation [SD], $7.4{\pm}1.6$ mm) were larger than benign lymph nodes (mean ${\pm}SD$, $6.6{\pm}1.4$ mm) (p = 0.018). Mean ADC values for reader 1 were $1.17{\pm}0.31{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$ for benign and $1.25{\pm}0.76{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$ for metastatic lymph nodes. Mean ADC values for reader 2 were $1.21{\pm}0.46{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$ for benign and $1.14{\pm}0.34{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$ for metastatic lymph nodes. Mean ADC values between benign and metastatic lymph nodes were not significantly different (p = 0.594 for reader 1, 0.463 for reader 2). Conclusion: Measuring mean ADC does not allow differentiating benign from metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer and non-necrotic, small lymph nodes.

Keywords

References

  1. van den Brekel MW, Stel HV, Castelijns JA, Nauta JJ, van der Waal I, Valk J, et al. Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 1990;177:379-384 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217772
  2. van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Snow GB. The size of lymph nodes in the neck on sonograms as a radiologic criterion for metastasis: how reliable is it? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:695-700
  3. Yuasa K, Kawazu T, Nagata T, Kanda S, Ohishi M, Shirasuna K. Computed tomography and ultrasonography of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:238-244 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600537
  4. King AD, Tse GM, Ahuja AT, Yuen EH, Vlantis AC, To EW, et al. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US. Radiology 2004;230:720-726 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303030157
  5. Som PM. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:961-969 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.5.1566697
  6. van den Brekel MW. Lymph node metastases: CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2000;33:230-238 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00145-X
  7. Ng SH, Yen TC, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, Wang HM, et al. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4371-4376 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7349
  8. Troost EG, Vogel WV, Merkx MA, Slootweg PJ, Marres HA, Peeters WJ, et al. 18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2007;48:726-735 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.037473
  9. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander Poorten V, Dirix P, Verbeken E, Nuyts S, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009;251:134-146 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080128
  10. Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, Morikawa M, Uetani M, Kabasawa H, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1627-1634
  11. Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1468-1477 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0133-x
  12. de Bondt RB, Hoeberigs MC, Nelemans PJ, Deserno WM, Peutz-Kootstra C, Kremer B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 2009;51:183-192 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-008-0487-2
  13. Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, Eiber M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:381-387 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.034
  14. Perrone A, Guerrisi P, Izzo L, D'Angeli I, Sassi S, Mele LL, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical lymph nodes: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol 2011;77:281-286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.039
  15. Jansen JF, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA, Shukla-Dave A. Non-gaussian analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:741-748 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1919
  16. King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, Fong DK, Lee YY, Lei KI, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2007;245:806-813 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451061804
  17. Wu LM, Xu JR, Liu MJ, Zhang XF, Hua J, Zheng J, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for nodal staging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 2012;19:331-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.027
  18. Gallus J, Mathiowetz V. Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:108-111 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.108
  19. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1622-1635 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
  20. Lee SC, Moon WJ, Choi JW, Roh HG, Bak SH, Yi JG, et al. Differentitation between primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma: added value of quantitative analysis of CT attenuation and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Korean Soc Magn Reson Med 2012;16:226-235 https://doi.org/10.13104/jksmrm.2012.16.3.226

Cited by

  1. The diagnostic value of 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting 5 to 10 mm metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma vol.95, pp.32, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000004286
  2. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging in the Head and Neck: Correlation with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging vol.17, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.641
  3. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method vol.17, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.650
  4. Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Unicystic Odontogenic Tumors for Differentiation of Unicystic Ameloblastomas from Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumors vol.19, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.79
  5. The diagnostic role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in hypopharyngeal carcinoma vol.15, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8053
  6. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the differentiation between lymphoma and metastatic lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck region vol.59, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117730688
  7. The Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.39, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a5813
  8. Predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatobiliary cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective analysis vol.116, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.007
  9. Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis vol.61, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02236-7
  10. Texture Analysis of Multi-Shot Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Diagnostic Value for Nodal Metastasis vol.8, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111767
  11. The primary lesion apparent diffusion coefficient is a prognostic factor for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study vol.19, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5684-3
  12. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing different sized metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers vol.61, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185119879686
  13. Higher‐order diffusion MRI characterization of mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer vol.84, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28102