DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differentiation between Focal Malignant Marrow-Replacing Lesions and Benign Red Marrow Deposition of the Spine with $T2^*$-Corrected Fat-Signal Fraction Map Using a Three-Echo Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Dixon Sequence

  • Kim, Yong Pyo (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kannengiesser, Stephan (MR Applications Development, Siemens AG, Healthcare Sector) ;
  • Paek, Mun-Young (Siemens Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Sungjun (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Tae-Sub (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Yeon Hwa (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Choon-Sik (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Ho-Taek (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Young Han (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Suh, Jin-Suck (Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.05.10
  • 심사 : 2014.08.27
  • 발행 : 2014.12.01

초록

Objective: To assess the feasibility of $T2^*$-corrected fat-signal fraction (FF) map by using the three-echo volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo (VIBE) Dixon sequence to differentiate between malignant marrow-replacing lesions and benign red marrow deposition of vertebrae. Materials and Methods: We assessed 32 lesions from 32 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging after being referred for assessment of a known or possible vertebral marrow abnormality. The lesions were divided into 21 malignant marrow-replacing lesions and 11 benign red marrow depositions. Three sequences for the parameter measurements were obtained by using a 1.5-T MR imaging scanner as follows: three-echo VIBE Dixon sequence for FF; conventional T1-weighted imaging for the lesion-disc ratio (LDR); pre- and post-gadolinium enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images for the contrast-enhancement ratio (CER). A region of interest was drawn for each lesion for parameter measurements. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the parameters and their sensitivities and specificities at the most ideal cutoff values from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were obtained. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were respectively compared between FF and CER. Results: The AUCs of FF, LDR, and CER were 0.96, 0.80, and 0.72, respectively. In the comparison of diagnostic performance between the FF and CER, the FF showed a significantly larger AUC as compared to the CER (p = 0.030), although the difference of sensitivity (p = 0.157) and specificity (p = 0.157) were not significant. Conclusion: Fat-signal fraction measurement using $T2^*$-corrected three-echo VIBE Dixon sequence is feasible and has a more accurate diagnostic performance, than the CER, in distinguishing benign red marrow deposition from malignant bone marrow-replacing lesions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Swartz PG, Roberts CC. Radiological reasoning: bone marrow changes on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(3 Suppl):S1-S4, Quiz S5-S9 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7069
  2. Shah LM, Hanrahan CJ. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:1298-1308 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7005
  3. Tall MA, Thompson AK, Vertinsky T, Palka PS. MR imaging of the spinal bone marrow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007;15:175-198, vi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2007.01.001
  4. Zajick DC Jr, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 2005;237:590-596 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372040990
  5. Ragab Y, Emad Y, Gheita T, Mansour M, Abou-Zeid A, Ferrari S, et al. Differentiation of osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures by chemical shift {in-phase and out-of phase} MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:125-133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.019
  6. Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK. The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1183-1188
  7. Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C, Ortori S, Bruschini L, Bartolozzi C. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1811-1818 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1229-6
  8. Wismer GL, Rosen BR, Buxton R, Stark DD, Brady TJ. Chemical shift imaging of bone marrow: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:1031-1037 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.145.5.1031
  9. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, Kesack CD, Cooper JA. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1439-1447 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353477
  10. Kühn JP, Evert M, Friedrich N, Kannengiesser S, Mayerle J, Thiel R, et al. Noninvasive quantification of hepatic fat content using three-echo dixon magnetic resonance imaging with correction for T2* relaxation effects. Invest Radiol 2011;46:783-789 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31822b124c
  11. Cassidy FH, Yokoo T, Aganovic L, Hanna RF, Bydder M, Middleton MS, et al. Fatty liver disease: MR imaging techniques for the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Radiographics 2009;29:231-260 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.291075123
  12. Geith T, Schmidt G, Biffar A, Dietrich O, Dürr HR, Reiser M, et al. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:1083-1092 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8010
  13. Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, Lo HY, Chou CT, Lee JM, et al. Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI: in comparison with compression fracture and metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:308-314 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10063
  14. Yamaguchi T, Iwata J, Sugihara S, McCarthy EF Jr, Karita M, Murakami H, et al. Distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumors from vertebral chordoma. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:291-299 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0435-y
  15. Zhao J, Krug R, Xu D, Lu Y, Link TM. MRI of the spine: image quality and normal-neoplastic bone marrow contrast at 3 T versus 1.5 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:873-880 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1750
  16. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873-1878 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
  17. Buckley DL, Parker GJM. Measuring contrast agent concentration in T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. In: Jackson A, Buckley DL, Parker GJM, eds. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology, 1st ed. Berlin, London: Springer, 2004:69-79
  18. Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Ma HT, Leung JC, Kwok TC, Leung PC. Bone marrow fat content in the elderly: a reversal of sex difference seen in younger subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:225-230 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23619
  19. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B. Classification and detection of bone marrow lesions with magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:529-545 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050434
  20. Carroll KW, Feller JF, Tirman PF. Useful internal standards for distinguishing infiltrative marrow pathology from hematopoietic marrow at MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:394-398 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880070224
  21. Eito K, Waka S, Naoko N, Makoto A, Atsuko H. Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures: assessment by dual-phase chemical shift imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:1020-1024 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20213
  22. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153:189-194 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263
  23. Kovanlikaya A, Guclu C, Desai C, Becerra R, Gilsanz V. Fat quantification using three-point dixon technique: in vitro validation. Acad Radiol 2005;12:636-639 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.01.019
  24. Reeder SB, Bice EK, Yu H, Hernando D, Pineda AR. On the performance of T2* correction methods for quantification of hepatic fat content. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:389-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23016
  25. Rahmouni A, Divine M, Mathieu D, Golli M, Dao TH, Jazaerli N, et al. Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1049-1052 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.5.8470574
  26. Breault SR, Heye T, Bashir MR, Dale BM, Merkle EM, Reiner CS, et al. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of pelvic and lumbar bone marrow: effect of age and marrow fat content on pharmacokinetic parameter values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:W297-W303 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9080
  27. Schweitzer ME, Levine C, Mitchell DG, Gannon FH, Gomella LG. Bull's-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology 1993;188:249-252 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.1.8511306

피인용 문헌

  1. Differentiation of Acute Osteoporotic and Malignant Vertebral Fractures by Quantification of Fat Fraction With a Dixon MRI Sequence vol.209, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.18168
  2. ADC as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions and compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.28, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5
  3. Diagnostic Performance of In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Chemical-Shift Imaging for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Vertebral Marrow Lesions: A Meta-Analysis vol.211, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.19306
  4. Validation of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging for accurate vertebral bone fat fraction quantification vol.10, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.10.004316
  5. Differentiation of Schmorl Nodes From Bone Metastases of the Spine: Use of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Derived From DWI and Fat Fraction Derived From a Dixon Sequence vol.213, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.21003
  6. The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow vol.48, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03271-4
  7. Differentiation of Vertebral Metastases From Focal Hematopoietic Marrow Depositions on MRI: Added Value of Proton Density Fat Fraction vol.216, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.22698
  8. T2-weighted Dixon MRI of the spine: A feasibility study of quantitative vertebral bone marrow analysis vol.102, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2021.01.013
  9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Lesions : Combination of Diffusion-Weighted and Proton Density Fat Fraction Spine MRI vol.31, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01009-1