DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Low Frequency Noise and It's Psychological Effects

  • Eom, Jin-Sup (Department of Psychology, Brain Research Institute, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sook-Hee (The Graduate School of Health and Complementary Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Soo (Center for Fluid Flow and Acoustics, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science) ;
  • Sohn, Jin-Hun (Department of Psychology, Brain Research Institute, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2013.12.19
  • Accepted : 2014.01.22
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Objective: This entire study has two parts. Study I aimed to develop a psychological assessment scale and the study II aimed to investigate the effects of LFN (low frequency noise) on the psychological responses in humans, using the scale developed in the study I. Background: LFN is known to have a negative impact on the functioning of humans. The negative impact of LFN can be categorized into two major areas of functioning of humans, physiological and psychological areas of functioning. The physiological impact can cause abnormalities in threshold, balancing and/or vestibular system, cardiovascular system and, hormone changes. Psychological functioning includes cognition, communication, mental health, and annoyance. Method: 182 college students participated in the study I in development of a psychological assessment scale and 42 paid volunteers participated in the study II to measure psychological responses. The LFN stimuli consisted of 12 different pure tones and 12 different 1 octave-band white noises and each stimulus had 4 different frequencies and 3 different sounds pressure levels. Results: We developed the psychological assessment scale consisting of 17 items with 3 dimensions of psychological responses (i.e., perceived physical, perceived physiological, and emotional responses). The main findings of LFN on the responses were as follows: 1. Perceived psychological responses showed a linear relation with SPL (sound pressure level), that is the higher the SPL is, the higher the negative psychological responses were. 2. Psychological responses showed quadric relations with SPL in general. 3. More negative responses at 31.5Hz LFN than those of 63 and 125Hz were reported, which is deemed to be caused by perceived vibration by 31.5Hz. 'Perceived vibration' at 31.5Hz than those of other frequencies of LFN is deemed to have amplified the negative psychological response. Consequently there found different effects of low frequency noise with different frequencies and intensity (SPL) on multiple psychological responses. Conclusion: Three dimensions of psychological responses drawn in regard to this study differed from others in the frequencies and SLP of LFN. Negative psychological responses are deemed to be differently affected by the frequency, SPL of the LFN and 'feel vibration' induced by the LFN. Application: The psychological scale from our study can be applied in quantitative psychological measurement of LFN at home or industrial environment. In addition, it can also help design systems to block LFN to provide optimal conditions if used the study outcome, .i.e., the relations between physical and psychological responses of LFN.

Keywords

References

  1. Belojevic, G., Jakovljevic, B. and Slepcevic, V., Noise and mental performance: personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise and Health, 6, 67-89, 2003.
  2. Bengtsson, J., Persson, W.K. and Kjellberg, A., Evaluations of effects due to low frequency noise in a low demanding work situation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 278, 83-99, 2003.
  3. Benton, S. and Leventhall, H.G., Experiments into the Impact of low level, low frequency noise upon human behavior, Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 5, 143-162, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/026309238600500403
  4. Berglund, B. and Hassmen, P., Sources and effects of low-frequency noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 99, 2985-3002, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414863
  5. Cavatorta, A., Falzoi, M., Romanelli, A., Cigala, F., Ricco, M., Bruschi, G., Franchini, I. and Borghetti, A., Adrenal response in the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension in workers exposed to high noise levels, J. Hypertension, 5, 463-466, 1987.
  6. Chen, Y.H.Q. and Hanmin, S., An investigation on the physiological and psychological effects of infrasound on persons. Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 23, 71-76, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1260/0263092041456828
  7. Gierke, H.E. von, and Nixon, C.W., Effects of intense infrasound on man, in Infrasound and Low Frequency Vibration, edited by W. Tempest (Academic, London), pp. 115-150, 1976.
  8. Hood, R.A. and Leventhall, H.G., Field measurement of infrasonic noise, Acustica, 25, 10-13, 1971.
  9. Inukai, Y., Taya, H., Miyano, H. and Kuriyama, H., A multidimensional evaluation method for the psychological effects of pure tones at low and infrasonic frequencies, Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 5, 104-112, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/026309238600500303
  10. Jung, S.S., Low frequency noise, Journal of Standards and Standardization, 1, 43-51, 2011.
  11. Leventhall, H.G., Low frequency noise in buildings. Internal and external sources, Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 7, 74-85, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1177/026309238800700204
  12. Leventhall, H.G., Low frequency noise and annoyance, Noise & Health. 6, 59-72, 2004.
  13. Moller, H., Physiological and psychological effects of infrasound on humans. Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 3, 1-17, 1984.
  14. Moller, H., Annoyance of audible infrasound, Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 6, 1-17, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/026309238700600101
  15. Moller, H. and Lydolf M., A questionnaire survey of complaints of infrasound and low-frequency noise, Noise Notes. 2, 3-12, 2003.
  16. Ochiai, H., Measurement of infra and low frequency noise, The Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of Japan, 23, 306-310, 1999.
  17. Pedersen, C.S., Moller, H. and Persson, W.K., Low-frequency noise complaints: a detailed investigation of twenty-two cases, Proceedings of Inter-Noise, 241-250, 2006.
  18. Parker, D.E., Effects of sound on the vestibular system," in Infrasound and Low Frequency Vibration, edited by W. Tempest (Academic, London), pp. 151-185, 1976.
  19. Poulsen, T. and Mortensen, F.R., Laboratory evaluation of annoyance of low frequency noise, Working Report No. 1, 2002.
  20. Waye, K.P., Clow, A., Edwards, S., Hucklebridge, F. and Rylander, R., Effects of nighttime low frequency noise on the cortisol response to awakening and subjective sloop quality, Life Sciences, 72, 863-875, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(02)02336-6