Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제6권3호
  • /
  • Pages.293-320
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soil-structure interaction vs Site effect for seismic design of tall buildings on soft soil

  • Fatahi, Behzad (Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)) ;
  • Tabatabaiefar, S. Hamid Reza (Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)) ;
  • Samali, Bijan (Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS))
  • 투고 : 2013.06.03
  • 심사 : 2013.10.28
  • 발행 : 2014.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, in order to evaluate adequacy of considering local site effect, excluding soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects in inelastic dynamic analysis and design of mid-rise moment resisting building frames, three structural models including 5, 10, and 15 storey buildings are simulated in conjunction with two soil types with the shear wave velocities less than 600 m/s, representing soil classes $D_e$ and $E_e$ according to the classification of AS1170.4-2007 (Earthquake actions in Australia) having 30 m bedrock depth. Structural sections of the selected frames were designed according to AS3600:2009 (Australian Standard for Concrete Structures) after undertaking inelastic dynamic analysis under the influence of four different earthquake ground motions. Then the above mentioned frames were analysed under three different boundary conditions: (i) fixed base under direct influence of earthquake records; (ii) fixed base considering local site effect modifying the earthquake record only; and (iii) flexible-base (considering full soil-structure interaction). The results of the analyses in terms of base shears and structural drifts for the above mentioned boundary conditions are compared and discussed. It is concluded that the conventional inelastic design procedure by only including the local site effect excluding SSI cannot adequately guarantee the structural safety for mid-rise moment resisting buildings higher than 5 storeys resting on soft soil deposits.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI 318 (2008) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
  2. Adam, M., Chouw, N. and Estorff, O. (2004), "Significance of soft local site in altering non-uniform ground motions and building response", Al-Azhar Univ. Eng. J., 8(1), 154-169.
  3. AS1170.4 (2007), Structural Design Actions - Part 4: Earthquake Actions in Australia, Australian Standards, Sydney, Australia.
  4. AS3600 (2009), Concrete Structures, Australian Standards, Sydney, Australia.
  5. AS/NZS1170.1-2002 (2002), Structural Design Actions - Part 1: Permanent, imposed and other actions, Australian Standards, Sydney, Australia.
  6. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Vol. 1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  7. Borcherdt, R.D. (1994), "Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (Methodology and Justification)", Earthquake Spectra, 10(4), 617-653. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585791
  8. BSSC (2003), The 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions For New Buildings And Other Structures, FEMA 450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
  9. Chandler, R., Clancy, J., Dixon, D., Goody, J. and Wooding, G. (2010), Building Type Basics for Housing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  10. Fatahi, B. and Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R. (2013), "Fully nonlinear versus equivalent linear computation method for seismic analysis of mid-rise buildings on soft soils", Int. J. Geomech. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000354
  11. Fatahi, B., Fatahi, B., Le, T.M. and Khabbaz, H. (2013), "Small-strain properties of soft clay treated with fibre and cement", Geosynthi. Int., 20(4), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00018
  12. FEMA 273 (1997), "NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings", prepared by the Applied Technology Council for FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency , Washington, D.C., USA.
  13. Furumura, T. and Kennett, B.L.N. (1998), "On the nature of regional seismic phases - III. The influence of crustal heterogeneity on the wave field for subduction earthquakes: The 1985 Michoacan and 1995 Copala, Guerrero, Mexico earthquakes", Geophys. J. Int., 135(3), 1060-1084. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00698.x
  14. Galal, K. and Naimi, M. (2008), "Effect of conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near fault earthquakes", Struct. Design Tall Special Build., 17(5), 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365
  15. Halbritter, A.L., Krutzik, N.J., Boyadjiev, Z. and Katona, T. (1998), "Dynamic analysis of VVER type nuclear power plants using different procedures for consideration of soil-structure interaction effects", Nucl. Eng. Des., 182(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00292-6
  16. Hardin, B.O. and Drnevich, V.P. (1972), "Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves", J. Soil Mech. Found., 7(8), 667-692.
  17. Hokmabadi, A.S. Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014), "Assessment of soil-pile-structure interaction influencing seismic response of mid-rise buildings sitting on floating pile foundations", Comput. Geotech., 55(1), 172-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.011
  18. IBC (2012), International Building Code, International Code Council (ICC).
  19. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2008), FLAC2D: Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Version 6.0, User's manual, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  20. Karamodin, A.K. and Kazemi, H.H. (2008), "Semi-active control of structures using neuro-predictive algorithm for MR dampers", Struct. Control Health Monitor., 17(3), 237-253.
  21. Kobayashi, H., Seo, K. and Midorikawa, S. (1986), "Estimated strong ground motions in the Mexico City earthquake", The Mexico Earthquakes 1985, Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, Proceedings of the International Conference, Camino Real Hotel, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 97-111.
  22. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Series, ISBN 0-13-374943-6.
  23. Matsui, J., Ohtomo, K. and Kanaya, K. (2004), "Development and validation of nonlinear dynamic analysis in seismic performance verification of underground RC structures", J. Adv. Concrete Tech., 2(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.2.25
  24. Nateghi-A, F. and Rezaei-Tabrizi, A. (2011), "Nonlinear dynamic response of tall buildings considering structure-soil-structure effects", Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 22(14), 1075-1082. DOI: 10.1002/tal.753.
  25. Olsen, K.B., Pencman, J.C. and Schuster, G.T. (1995), "Simulation of 3-D elastic wave propagation in the Salt Lake Basin", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 85, pp. 1688-1710.
  26. PEER (2012), PEER Ground Motion Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  27. Rahvar (2006a), Geotechnical Investigations and Foundation Design Report of Kooh-e-Noor Commercial Building, P.O. Rahvar Pty Ltd., Final Report, Tehran, Iran, pp. 1-69.
  28. Rahvar (2006b), Geotechnical Investigations and Foundation Design Report of Mahshahr Train Station, P. O. Rahvar Pty Ltd., Iran Railways Authority, Mahshahr, Iran, pp. 1-42.
  29. Rayhani, M.H. and El Naggar, M.H. (2008), "Numerical modelling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil", Int. J. Geomech., ASCE, 8(6), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:6(336)
  30. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1969), "Influence of soil conditions on ground motion during earthquakes", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 95(2), 99-137.
  31. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R. and Seed, B. (1998), Dynamic Module and Damping Ratios for Cohesive Soils, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  32. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2013a), "Seismic behaviour of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Geomech., 13(4), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231
  33. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2013b), "Lateral seismic response of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction effects", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 45(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.311
  34. Veletsos, A.S. and Meek, J.W. (1974), "Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation system", J. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 3(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030203
  35. Vision 2000 (1995), "Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings", Structural Engineers Association of California.
  36. Wolf, J. (1985), Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction, Prentice Hall Co, NJ, USA.

피인용 문헌

  1. Soil -structure interaction analysis of a building frame supported on piled raft vol.5, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2016.5.1.041
  2. Dynamic soil-structure interaction studies on 275m tall industrial chimney with openings vol.7, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.2.233
  3. Adjustment of minimum seismic shear coefficient considering site effects for long-period structures vol.13, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/13/3/304
  4. Field testing and numerical modeling of a low-fill box culvert under a flexible pavement subjected to traffic loading vol.11, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.5.625
  5. Advanced computation methods for soil-structure interaction analysis of structures resting on soft soils 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1354510
  6. Effects of Soil Plasticity on Seismic Performance of Mid-Rise Building Frames Resting on Soft Soils vol.17, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.10.1387
  7. Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Soil-Steel Interface Shear Behavior vol.54, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-017-9474-0
  8. Evaluation of numerical procedures to determine seismic response of structures under influence of soil-structure interaction vol.56, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.1.027
  9. Analysis of Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction for a Nuclear Power Plant (HTR-10) vol.2017, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2358403
  10. Dynamic Analysis of Soil Structure Interaction Effect on Multi Story RC Frame vol.08, pp.04, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2018.84030
  11. Evaluation of structural systems in slender high-rise buildings vol.19, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2018.1449597
  12. An investigation on the evaluation of dynamic soil characteristics of the Elazig City through the 1-D equivalent linear site-response analysis pp.1435-9537, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01450-6
  13. Dynamic behaviour of unbraced steel frames resting on soft ground pp.18670520, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201800003
  14. A new practical equivalent linear model for estimating seismic hysteretic energy demand of bilinear systems vol.70, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.3.289
  15. Influence of structure-soil-structure interaction on foundation behavior for two adjacent structures: Geo-centrifuge experiment vol.19, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.19.5.407
  16. Determination of seismic hazard and soil response of a critical region in Turkey considering far-field and near-field earthquake effect vol.20, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.2.131
  17. Microtremor measurements and 3D dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis for a historical masonry arch bridge under the effects of near- and far-fault earthquakes vol.79, pp.13, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09086-0
  18. Seismic behavior of steel cabinets considering nonlinear connections and site-response effects vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.1.017
  19. Effect mechanism of unfrozen water on the frozen soil-structure interface during the freezing-thawing process vol.22, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.22.3.245
  20. Comparison of seismic behavior of steel building adjacent to slope topography by considering fixed-base, SSI and TSSI vol.21, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00266-8
  21. Analysis of the Second Order Effect of the SSI on the Building during a Seismic Load vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6020020