DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New metal connectors developed to improve the shear strength of stone masonry walls

  • Karabork, Turan (Division of Structures, Department of Civil Engineering, Aksaray University) ;
  • Kocak, Yilmaz (Inspection and Control Expert, Ministry of Defense)
  • Received : 2013.10.10
  • Accepted : 2014.02.15
  • Published : 2014.04.10

Abstract

Stone masonry structures are widely used around the world, but they deteriorate easily, due to low shear strength capacity. Many techniques have been developed to increase the shear strength of stone masonry constructions. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the performance of stone masonry walls strengthened by metal connectors as an alternative shear reinforcement technique. For this purpose, three new metal connector (clamp) types were developed. The shear strength of the walls was improved by applying these clamps to stone masonry walls. Ten stone masonry walls were structurally tested in diagonal compression. Various parameters regarding the in-plane behavior of strengthening stone masonry walls, including shear strength, failure modes, maximum drift, ductility, and shear modulus, were investigated. Experimentally obtained shear strengths were confirmed by empirical equations. The results of the study suggest that the new clamps developed for the study effectively increased the levels of shear strength and ductility of masonry constructions.

Keywords

References

  1. Altin, S., Anil, O., Kara, M.E. and Kaya, M. (2008), "An experimental study on strengthening of masonry infilled RC frames using diagonal CFRP strips", Compos., Part B, 39, 680-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.06.001
  2. Arioglu, N. and Acun, S. (2006), "A research about a method for restoration of traditional lime mortars and plasters", Build. Environ., 41, 1223-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.015
  3. ASTM Committee E-519-02 (2002), Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear) in masonry assemblages, American Society for Testing and Materials International, USA.
  4. Augenti, N. and Parisi, F. (2010), "Constitutive models for tuff masonry under uniaxial compression", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 22(11), 1102-1111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000119
  5. Augenti, N. and Parisi, F. (2011), "Constitutive modeling of tuff masonry in direct shear", Constr. Build. Mater., 25, 1612-1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.10.002
  6. British Standards Institution (2005), Design of structures for earthquake resistance (BS EN 1998-3).
  7. Chiostrini, S. and Vignoli, A. (1992), "An experimental research program on the behavior of stone masonry structures", J. Test Eval., 20 (3), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE11712J
  8. Corradi, M., Borri, A. and Vignoli, A. (2003), "Experimental study on the determination of strength of masonry walls", J. Constr. Build. Mater., 17(5), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00007-2
  9. El Gawady, M.A., Lestuzzi, P. and Badoux, M. (2006), "Aseismic retrofitting of reinforced masonry walls using FRP", Compos., Part B, Eng., 37(2-3), 148-162.
  10. Eurocode-6 EN 1996-1-1 (2005), Design of masonry structures, part1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, Brussels.
  11. Gabor, A., Bennani, A., Jacquelin, E. and Lebon, F. (2006),"Modelling approaches of the in-plane shear behavior of unreinforced and FRP strengthened masonry panels", Compos. Struct., 74, 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.012
  12. Isikdag, B. and Topcu, I.B. (2013), "The effect of ground granulated blast-furnace slag on the properties of Horasan mortar", Constr. Build. Mater., 40, 448-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.016
  13. Ismail, N., Petersen, R.B., Masia, M.J. and Ingham, J.M. (2011), "Diagonal shear behavior of unreinforced masonry wallets strengthened using twisted steel bars", Constr. Build. Mater., 25, 4386-4393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.063
  14. Ismail, N., Petersen, R.B., Masia, M.J. and Ingham, J.M. (2012), "Finite element modeling of unreinforced masonry shear wallets strengthened using twisted steel bars", Constr. Build. Mater., 33, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.016
  15. Kalali, A. and Kabir, M.Z. (2012), "Experimental response of double-wythe masonry panels strengthened with glass fiber reinforced polymers subjected to diagonal compression tests", Eng. Struct., 39, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.018
  16. Kourkoulis, S.K. and Pasiou, E.D. (2009), "Epistyles connected with I connectors under pure shear", J. Serbian Soc. Comput. Mech., 3(2), 81-99.
  17. Papadopoulos, K.A. (2006), "The restoration study of the connections between the stone blocks in the steps of the temple of Apollo Epikourios", Struct. Anal. Histori. Constr., New Delhi, India, November.
  18. RILEM (1994), LUMB6-Diagonal tensile strength tests of small wall specimens, Tech Rep, RILEM.
  19. Shariati, M., Sulong, N.H.R., Suhatril, M., Shariati, A., Khanouki, M.M.A. and Sinaei, H. (2012), "Behaviour of C-shaped angle shear connectors under monotonic and fully reversed cyclic loading: an experimental study", Mater. Des., 41, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.039
  20. The Masonry Standards Joint Committee (2005), Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530-05 & 530.1-05 / ASCE 5-05 & 6-05 / TMS 402-05 & 602-05).
  21. Tomazevic, M., Lutman, M. and Pertrovic, L. (1993), In plane behavior of reinforced masonry walls subjected to cyclic lateral loads, Report to the ministry of science and technology of Republic of Slovenia, parts 1 and 2. Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  22. Tomazevic, M. (1999), Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings, Imperial College Press, London, England.
  23. Toumbakari, E.E. (2008), "The Athens Parthenon: Analysis and interpretation of the structural failures in the ortostate of the northern wall", Struct. Anal. Histori. Constr., United Kingdom.
  24. Turkish Standard. TS EN 196-1 (2002), Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength, Ankara, Turkey.
  25. Turkish Standard. TS 699 (2009), Natural building stones - Methods of inspection and laboratory testing, Ankara, Turkey.
  26. TSB Committee E30 (1998), Earthquake resistant design: national construction code, Technical Standard for Buildings, Lima.

Cited by

  1. Field Investigation on the Performance of Mosques and Minarets during the Elazig-Sivrice Earthquake vol.34, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001527