The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How will surface treatments affect the translucency of porcelain laminate veneers?

  • Turgut, Sedanur (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Bagis, Bora (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Ayaz, Elif Aydogan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Korkmaz, Fatih Mehmet (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Ulusoy, Kivanc Utku (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suleyman Demirel University) ;
  • Bagis, Yildirim Hakan (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University)
  • Received : 2013.03.29
  • Accepted : 2013.12.30
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether surface treatments affect the translucency of laminate veneers with different shades and thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 224 disc-shaped ceramic veneers were prepared from A1, A3, HT (High Translucent) and HO (High Opaque) shades of IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent) with 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm thicknesses. The ceramics were divided into four groups for surface treatments. Group C: no surface treatments; Group HF: etched with hydrofluoric acid; Group SB: sandblasted with 50-${\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$; and Group L; irradiated with an Er;YAG laser. A translucent shade of resin cement (Rely X Veneer, 3M ESPE) was chosen for cementation. The color values of the veneers were measured with a colorimeter and translucency parameter (TP) values were calculated. A three-way ANOVA with interactions for TP values was performed and Bonferroni tests were used when appropriate (${\alpha}=0.05$). RESULTS. There were significant interactions between the surface treatments, ceramic shades and thicknesses (P=.001). For the 0.5-mm-thick specimens there were significant differences after the SB and L treatments. There was no significant difference between the HF and C treatments for any shades or thicknesses (P>.05). For the 1-mm-thick ceramics, there was only a significant difference between the L and C treatments for the HT shade ceramics (P=.01). There were also significant differences between the SB and C treatments except not for the HO shades (P=.768). CONCLUSION. The SB and L treatments caused laminate veneers to become more opaque; however, HF treatment did not affect the TP values. When the laminate veneers were thinner, both the shade of the ceramic and the SB and laser treatments had a greater effect on the TP values.

Keywords

References

  1. Freire A, Archegas LR. Porcelain laminate veneer on a highly discoloured tooth: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2010;76: a126.
  2. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5.
  3. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater 2007;23:461-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.002
  4. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. Adhesive luting of allceramic restorations--the impact of cementation variables and short-term water storage on the strength of a feldspathic dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:285-93.
  5. Saracoglu A, Cura C, Cotert HS. Effect of various surface treatment methods on the bond strength of the heat-pressed ceramic samples. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:790-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01305.x
  6. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:73-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x
  7. Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 12th ed. Mosby St. Louis; 2006, p. 35-42.
  8. Paravina RD, Ontiveros JC, Powers JM. Curing-dependent changes in color and translucency parameter of composite bleach shades. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:158-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00516.x
  9. Craig RG, Powers JM. Optical, thermal, and electrical properties. In: Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. St Louis (MO) Mosby; 2002, p. 38-44.
  10. Ryan EA, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials. J Can Dent Assoc 2010;76:a84.
  11. Turgut S, Bagis B. Colour stability of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Dent 2011;39:e57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.10.003
  12. Fujita K, Nishiyama N, Nemoto K, Okada T, Ikemi T. Effect of base monomer's refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. Dent Mater J 2005;24:403-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.403
  13. Duarte S Jr, Perdigao J, Lopes M. Composite resin restorations-- natural aesthetic and dynamics of light. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:657-64; quiz 666.
  14. Chu FC, Chow TW, Chai J. Contrast ratios and masking ability of three types of ceramic veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60120-6
  15. Stevenson B, Ibbetson R. The effect of the substructure on the colour of samples/restorations veneered with ceramic: a literature review. J Dent 2010;38:361-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.009
  16. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, Lebeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105:83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60004-8
  17. Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A. Resin cement color stability and its influence on the final shade of all-ceramics. J Dent 2011;39:e30-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.008
  18. Yu B, Lee YK. Influence of color parameters of resin composites on their translucency. Dent Mater 2008;24:1236-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.016
  19. Imirzalioglu P, Karacaer O, Yilmaz B, Ozmen Msc I. Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee, and nicotine. J Prosthodont 2010;19:118-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00535.x
  20. Lu H, Powers JM. Color stability of resin cements after accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2004;17:354-8.
  21. Luo XP, Zhang L. Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 2010;19:465-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00610.x
  22. Chu SJ. Precision shade technology: contemporary strategies in shade selection. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:79-83.
  23. Wang H, Xiong F, Zhenhua L. Influence of varied surface texture of dentin porcelain on optical properties of porcelain specimens. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60039-5
  24. Lu R, Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ, Alexander B. An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface. Aust Dent J 1992;37:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00827.x
  25. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
  26. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501
  27. Gbureck U, Masten A, Probst J, Thull R. Tribochemical structuring and coating of implant metal surfaces with titanium oxide and hydroxyapatite layers. Mater Sci Eng C 2003; 23:461-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00322-3
  28. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  29. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:316-20.
  30. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70170-2
  31. da Silva Ferreira S, Hanashiro FS, de Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2528
  32. Shiu P, De Souza-Zaroni WC, Eduardo Cde P, Youssef MN. Effect of feldspathic ceramic surface treatments on bond strength to resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:291-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2018
  33. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:1233-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1201-5
  34. Kara HB, Dilber E, Koc O, Ozturk AN, Bulbul M. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0860-3

Cited by

  1. Translucency of ceramic veneers on glazing effect vol.53, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.2.138
  2. Light transmittance and surface roughness of a feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM material as a function of different surface treatments vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0245-5
  3. The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Mechanical and Optical Behaviors of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12749
  4. Optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials at different thicknesses pp.14964155, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12382
  5. Comparison of translucency for different thicknesses of recent types of esthetic zirconia ceramics versus conventional ceramics … (in vitro study) vol.4, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.003
  6. Color Stability, Translucency, and Wettability of a Lithium Disilicate Dental Ceramics Submitted to Different Surface Treatments vol.11, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1304
  7. Effect of handling material on mechanical and optical properties of feldspathic porcelain vol.33, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12665
  8. How will surface conditioning methods influence the translucency and color properties of CAD‐CAM resin‐matrix ceramics with different thicknesses? vol.33, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12667
  9. Effect of different surface treatments on optical, colorimetric, and surface characteristics of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic vol.33, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12793