DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adaptive-length pendulum smart tuned mass damper using shape-memory-alloy wire for tuning period in real time

  • Pasala, Dharma Theja Reddy (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University) ;
  • Nagarajaiah, Satish (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering & Material science, Rice University)
  • Received : 2012.05.01
  • Accepted : 2013.05.10
  • Published : 2014.02.25

Abstract

Due to the shift in paradigm from passive control to adaptive control, smart tuned mass dampers (STMDs) have received considerable attention for vibration control in tall buildings and bridges. STMDs are superior to tuned mass dampers (TMDs) in reducing the response of the primary structure. Unlike TMDs, STMDs are capable of accommodating the changes in primary structure properties, due to damage or deterioration, by tuning in real time based on a local feedback. In this paper, a novel adaptive-length pendulum (ALP) damper is developed and experimentally verified. Length of the pendulum is adjusted in real time using a shape memory alloy (SMA) wire actuator. This can be achieved in two ways i) by changing the amount of current in the SMA wire actuator or ii) by changing the effective length of current carrying SMA wire. Using an instantaneous frequency tracking algorithm, the dominant frequency of the structure can be tracked from a local feedback signal, then the length of pendulum is adjusted to match the dominant frequency. Effectiveness of the proposed ALP-STMD mechanism, combined with the STFT frequency tracking control algorithm, is verified experimentally on a prototype two-storey shear frame. It has been observed through experimental studies that the ALP-STMD absorbs most of the input energy associated in the vicinity of tuned frequency of the pendulum damper. The reduction of storey displacements up to 80 % when subjected to forced excitation (harmonic and chirp-signal) and a faster decay rate during free vibration is observed in the experiments.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe, M and Fujino, Y. (1994), "Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 23, 813-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230802
  2. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (1989), Manual of steel construction-allowable stress design, 9th Ed., Chicago, IL.
  3. Baker, G. (1996), "Exact deflections in nonprismatic members", Comput. Struct., 61(3), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(96)00046-6
  4. Chang, J.C.H. and Soong, T.T. (1980), "Structural control using active tuned mass dampers", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 6(106), 1091-1098.
  5. Choi, C.K. and Kim, S.H. (1989), "Coupled use of reduced integration and nonconforming modes in improving quadratic plate element", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 28(4), 1909-1928. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620280814
  6. Choi, C.K. and Kwak, H.G. (1989), "Optimum RC member design with discrete sections", Proceedings of the '89 ASCE Structures Congress, San Francisco, May.
  7. Chu, S.Y., Soong, T.T. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2005), Active, hybrid, semi-active structural control-a design and implementation handbook, Wiley, New York.
  8. Cohen, L. (1995), Time-frequency analysis (1st Ed.), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  9. Contreras, M., Pasala, D.T.R. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2012) "Adaptive length SMA pendulum smart tuned mass damper performance in the presence of real time primary system stiffness change", Smart Struct. Syst. (accepted).
  10. Dyck, J., Nagarajaiah, S. and Taylor, D. (2006) "Variation of supplemental stiffness and damping using adjustable fluid spring and damper", Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, CDROM.
  11. Hrovat, D., Barak, P. and Rabins, M. (1982), "Semiactive versus passive or active tuned mass dampers for structural control", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 3(109), 691-705.
  12. Ikeda, Y., Sasaki, K., Sakamoto, M. and Kobori, T. (2001) "Active mass driver system as the first application of active structural control", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30(11), 1575-1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.82
  13. Jangid, R.S. (1999), "Optimal multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 28(9), 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::AID-EQE853>3.0.CO;2-E
  14. Kareem, A. and Kline, S. (1993), "Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 2(121), 348-361.
  15. Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Nasu, T., Niwa, N. and Ogasawara, K. (1993), "Seismic response controlled structure with active variable stiffness system", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 22(11), 925-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290221102
  16. Kurata, N., Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Niw, N. and Midorikawa, H. (1999), "Actual seismic response controlled building with semiactive damper system", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 28, 1427-1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1427::AID-EQE876>3.0.CO;2-#
  17. LRFD-AISC, Manual of Steel Construction, Load and Resistance Factor Design (1999), Metric conversion of the 2nd Ed., Vol. 1, 2. AISC, Chicago.
  18. Nagarajaiah, S. and Mate, D. (1998), "Semi-active control of continuously variable stiffness system", Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan.
  19. Nagarajaiah, S., Vardarajan, N. and Sahasrabudhe, S. (1999), "Variable stiffness and instantaneous frequency", Proceedings of the Structures Congress, ASCE, 1, 858-861.
  20. Nagarajaiah, S. (2000), Structural vibration damper with continuously variable stiffness, US Patent No. 6098969.
  21. Nagarajaiah, S. and Varadarajan, N. (2005), "Semi-active control of wind excited building with variable stiffness TMD using short-time Fourier transform", Eng. Struct., 27, 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.015
  22. Nagarajaiah, S. and Sahasrabudhe, S. (2006), "Seismic response control of smart sliding isolated buildings using variable stiffness systems: experimental and numerical study", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 35(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.514
  23. Nagarajaiah, S. and Sonmez, E. (2007), "Structures of semi-active variable stiffness multiple tuned mass dampers under harmonic forces", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 133(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(67)
  24. Nagarajaiah, S. (2009), "Adaptive passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers: identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, Hilbert transform, and short-term Fourier transform", Struct. Health Monit. Control, 16 (7-8), 800-841. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.349
  25. Nagarajaiah, S., Pasala, D.T.R., Huang, C. (2010), "Smart TMD: Adaptive length pendulum dampers", Proceedings of the 5th world conference on structural control and health monitoring, Tokyo, Japan, CDROM.
  26. Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Taylor, D., Pasala, D.T.R. and Sarlis, A.A.S. (2010), "Adaptive negative stiffness: A new structural modification approach for seismic protection", Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, Tokyo, Japan, CDROM.
  27. Nagarajaiah, S. and Pasala, D.T.R. "NEESR-adapt-struct: semi-active control of ASD device -adaptive length pendulum dampers", Proceedings of the 19th Analysis and computation specialty conference, ASCE, CDROM.
  28. Narasimhan, S. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2005), "STFT algorithm for semiactive control of base isolated buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems subjected to near fault earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 27, 514-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.010
  29. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber", Transactions ASME, APM-50-7, 9-22.
  30. Pasala, D.T.R, Nagarajaiah, S., Grigoriadis, K.M. (2012), "Tracking control of variable stiffness hysteretic-systems using linear-parameter-varying gain-scheduled controller", Smart Struct. Syst., 9(4), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.9.4.373
  31. Saka, M.P. and Hasancebi, O. (2009), "Design code optimization of steel structures using adaptive harmony search algorithm", Stud. Comput. Intel., 239, 79-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03450-3_3
  32. Salvadori, M.G. and Baron, M.L. (1961), Numerical methods in engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  33. Smith, S. (1998), "The simplex method and evolutionary algorithms", Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 799-804.
  34. Spencer, B.F. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003) "State of the art of structural control", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 129(7), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845)
  35. Sun, J.Q., Jolly, M.R. and Norris, M.A. (1995), "Passive, adaptive, and active tuned vibration absorbers: a survey", J. Mech. Design, 111, 234-242.
  36. Varadarajan, N. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2004), "Wind response control of building with variable stiffness tuned mass damper using EMD/HT", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 130 (4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(451)
  37. Yalla, S.K., Kareem, A. and Cantor, J.C. (2001), "Semi-active tuned liquid dampers for vibration control of structures", Eng. Struct., 23(11), 1469-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00047-5
  38. Yamada, K. and Kobori, T. (1995) "Control algorithm for estimating future responses of active variable stiffness structure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 24(8), 1085-1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240804
  39. Yang, J.N., Bobrow, J., Jabbari, F., Leavitt, J., Cheng, C.P. and Lin, P.Y. (2007), "Full-scale experimental verification of resetable semiactive stiffness dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 36 (9), 1255-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.681

Cited by

  1. Suspension-type tuned mass dampers with varying pendulum length to dissipate energy vol.23, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1834
  2. Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.4.547
  3. Toward an adaptive vibration absorber using shape-memory alloys, for civil engineering applications 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X17721031
  4. Steady-state response attenuation of a linear oscillator–nonlinear absorber system by using an adjustable-length pendulum in series: Numerical and experimental results vol.344, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.030
  5. Smart tuned mass dampers: recent developments vol.13, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.173
  6. Study on self-adjustable variable pendulum tuned mass damper pp.15417794, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1561
  7. Semi-active phase control of tuned mass dampers for translational and torsional vibration mitigation of structures vol.25, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2191
  8. Control performance of suspended mass pendulum with the consideration of out-of-plane vibrations vol.25, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2217
  9. Experimental verification of leverage-type stiffness-controllable tuned mass damper using direct output feedback LQR control with time-delay compensation vol.12, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.4.425
  10. Energy harvesting techniques for health monitoring and indicators for control of a damaged pipe structure vol.21, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.3.287
  11. Modified pendular vibration absorber for structures under base excitation vol.66, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.161
  12. Semi-active eddy current pendulum tuned mass damper with variable frequency and damping vol.25, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.1.065
  13. Structural Vibration Control of the Spatial Suspended Mass Pendulum vol.455, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/455/1/012001
  14. Vibration reduction by stiffness modulation – A theoretical study vol.501, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116040
  15. A Passive Adaptive Suspended Mass Pendulum to Compensate Detuning Due to Large Swing Angle vol.21, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455421501236
  16. Multifunctional properties of shape memory materials in civil engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review vol.44, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102657