DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impacts of dam discharge on river environments and phytoplankton communities in a regulated river system, the lower Han River of South Korea

  • Jung, Seung Won (Library of Marine Samples, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Oh Youn (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Yun, Suk Min (Library of Marine Samples, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Joo, Hyoung Min (Korea Polar Research Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Kang, Jung-Hoon (South Sea Environment Research Division, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jin Hwan (Department of Life Science, Sangmyung University)
  • 투고 : 2013.09.03
  • 심사 : 2013.11.19
  • 발행 : 2014.02.28

초록

To understand the effects of fluctuations in dam discharge due to river environments and phytoplankton communities, we monitored such environments and phytoplankton communities biweekly, from February 2001 to February 2002 and from February 2004 to February 2005, in the lower Han River (LHR), South Korea. The phytoplankton abundance during the dry season was approximately two times higher than that during the rainy season. In particular, fluctuations in diatom assemblages, which constituted over 70% of the total phytoplankton abundance, were affected severely by the changes in the discharge. When a large quantity of water in a dam was discharged into the LHR, the conductivity and the concentrations of total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) decreased rapidly, whereas the concentrations of suspended solids (SS), dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), and dissolved silica (DSi) increased immediately. Time-delayed relationship also revealed that the dam discharge had an immediately significant negative relationship with phytoplankton abundance. On the whole, fluctuations in phytoplankton communities in the LHR were influenced much more by hydrodynamics such as dam discharge than by the availability of nutrients. Thus, the variability in these concentrations usually parallels the strength of river flow that is associated with summer rainfall, with higher values during periods of high river discharge.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. APHA. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  2. Bahnwart M, Huberner T, Schubert H. 1999. Downstream changes in phytoplankton composition and biomass in a lowland river-lake system (Warnow River, Germany). Hydrobiologia 391: 99-111.
  3. Brett MT, Goldman CR. 1996. A meta-analysis of the freshwater trophic cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 7723-7726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7723
  4. Domingues RB, Barbosa AB, Sommer U, Galvao HM. 2012. Phytoplankton composition, growth and production in the Guadinan estuary (SW Iberia): unraveling changes induced after dam construction. Sci Total Environ 416: 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.043
  5. Dynesius M, Nilsson C. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753-762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.266.5186.753
  6. Gosselain V, Descy JP, Everbecq E. 1994. The phytoplankton community of the River Meuse, Belgium: seasonal dynamics (year 1992) and the possible incidence of zooplankton grazing. Hydrobiologia 289: 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007419
  7. Ha K, Kim HW, Joo GJ. 1998. The phytoplankton succession in the lower part of hypertrophic Nakdong River (Mulgum), South Korea. Hydrobiologia 369/370: 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017067809089
  8. Hallegraeff GM. 1993. A review of harmful algae blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia 32: 79-99. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1
  9. Hotzel G, Croome R. 1994. Long-term phytoplankton monitoring of the Darling River at Burtundy, New South Wales: incidence and significance of cyanobacterial blooms. Mar Freshw Res 45: 747-759. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9940747
  10. Humborg C, Ittekkot V, Cociasu A, Bodungen BV. 1997. Effect of Danube river dam on black sea biogeochemistry and ecosystem structure. Nature 386: 385-388. Hutchinson GE. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95: 137-145.
  11. Hutchinson GE. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95: 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1086/282171
  12. Jeong KS, Kim DK, Joo GJ. 2007. Delayed influence of dam storage and discharge on the determination of seasonal proliferations of Microcystis aeruginosa and Stephanodiscus hantzschii in a regulated river system of the lower Nakdong River (South Korea). Water Res 41: 1269-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.054
  13. Jung SW, Joo HM, Kim OK, Lee JH, Han MS. 2011. Effects of temperature and nutrient depletion and reintroduction on growth of Stephanodiscus hantzschii (Bacillariophyceae): implications for the blooming mechanism. J Freshw Ecol 26: 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2011.553927
  14. Kim HI, Lee JS, Heo JH, Cho WC. 1998. A study on the contaminant transport characteristics in Han River. Korea Water Resour Assoc 31: 85-93.
  15. Lamouroux N, Capra H. 2002. Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for target fish populations. Freshw Biol 47: 1543-1556. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00879.x
  16. Mason CF. 2002. Biology of freshwater pollution. 4th ed. Pearson, London.
  17. McKee LJ, Eyre BD, Hossain S, Pepperell PR. 2001. Influence of climate, geology and humans on spatial and temporal nutrient geochemistry in the subtropical Richmond River catchment, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 52: 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99025
  18. Park SB, Lee SK, Chang KH, Jeong KS, Joo GJ. 2002. The impact of Jangma (monsoon rainfall) on the changes of water quality in the lower Nakdong River (Mulgeum). Korean J Limnol 35: 161-170.
  19. Sellner KG, Brownlee DC, Bundy MH, Brownlee SG, Braun KR. 1993. Zooplankton grazing in a Potomac River cyanobacterial bloom. Estuaries Coast 16: 859-872. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352445
  20. Shapiro J, Wright DI. 1984. Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshw Biol 14: 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00161.x
  21. Soballe DM, Kimmel BL. 1987. A large-scale comparison of factors influencing phytoplankton abundance in rivers, lakes, and impoundments. Ecology 68: 1943-1954. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939885
  22. Sullivan BE, Prahl FG, Small LF, Covert PA. 2001. Seasonality of phytoplankton production in the Columbia River: a natural or anthropogenic pattern? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65: 1125-1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00565-2
  23. Webster IT, Sherman BS, Bormans M, Jones G. 2000. Management strategies for cyanobacterial blooms in an impounded lowland river. Regul Rivers Res Mgmt 16: 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<513::AID-RRR601>3.0.CO;2-B
  24. Zeng H, Song L, Yu Z, Chen H. 2006. Distribution of phytoplankton in the Three-Gorge Reservoir during rainy and dry seasons. Sci Total Environ 367: 999-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.03.001

피인용 문헌

  1. Unresolved diversity and monthly dynamics of eukaryotic phytoplankton in a temperate freshwater reservoir explored by pyrosequencing vol.67, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/MF15136
  2. Status, Alert System, and Prediction of Cyanobacterial Bloom in South Korea vol.2015, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/584696
  3. 보 건설에 따른 영산강의 조류 발생 및 환경 변화: 수질측정망 장기 자료 분석 vol.48, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11614/ksl.2015.48.4.238
  4. Field Study of Water Quality Improvement by Circulation, Sonication and Ozonation vol.33, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15681/kswe.2017.33.2.170
  5. 영산강 하구둑 담수 방류에 따른 하구 건강성 평가 vol.50, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11614/ksl.2017.50.1.046
  6. Hydro-ecological controls on riverine organic carbon dynamics in the tropical monsoon region vol.9, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48208-y
  7. 18S rRNA Analysis Reveals High Diversity of Phytoplankton with Emphasis on a Naked Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium sp. at the Han River (Korea) vol.13, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/d13020073
  8. Phytoplankton nutrient use and CO2 dynamics responding to long-term changes in riverine N and P availability vol.203, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117510