DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PRELIMINARY SAFETY STUDY OF ENGINEERING-SCALE PYROPROCESS FACILITY

  • Moon, Seong-In (Nonproliferation System Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Chong, Won-Myung (Nonproliferation System Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • You, Gil-Sung (Nonproliferation System Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Ku, Jeong-Hoe (Nonproliferation System Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Dong (Nonproliferation System Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lim, Yong-Kyu (Nuclear Department, Hyundai Engineering Company, KT Computerized Information Center) ;
  • Chang, Hyeon-Sik (Nuclear Department, Hyundai Engineering Company, KT Computerized Information Center)
  • Received : 2013.02.26
  • Accepted : 2013.06.08
  • Published : 2014.02.25

Abstract

Pyroprocess technology has been considered as a fuel cycle option to solve the spent fuel accumulation problems in Korea. The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute has been studying pyroprocess technology, and the conceptual design of an engineering-scale pyroprocess facility, called the Advanced Fuel Cycle (AFC) facility, has been performed on the basis of a 10tHM throughput per year. In this paper, the concept of the AFC facility was introduced, and its safety evaluations were performed. For the safety evaluations, anticipated accident events were selected, and environmental safety analyses were conducted for the safety of the public and workers. In addition, basic radiation shielding safety analyses and criticality safety analyses were conducted. These preliminary safety studies will be used to specify the concept of safety systems for pyroprocess facilities, and to establish safety design policies and advance more definite safety designs.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, I.J., et al., 2012, Development of Demonstration Facility Design Technology for Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle Process, KAERI/RR-3414/2011.
  2. You, G.S., et al., 2011, Concept and safety studies of an integrated pyroprocess facility, Nuclear Engineering Design, No. 241, pp. 415-424
  3. Park, C.V., 2006, High-level functional and operational requirements for the advanced fuel cycle facility, INL/EXT-06-12059.
  4. Idaho National Laboratory, 2008, Advanced fuel cycle facility conceptual design and NEPA support activities, AFCF-ST-001.
  5. Young, P.L. et al., 2008, Advanced fuel cycle facility accident analyses as part of the global nuclear energy partnership programmatic environmental impact statement, GNEP-01-08
  6. Young, P.L. et al., 2008, Nuclear fuel recycling center accident analyses as part of the global nuclear energy partnership programmatic environmental impact statement, GNEP-02-08
  7. Kakehi, I. and Nakabayashi, H., 2000, Study of safety aspects pyrochemical reprocessing systems, JNC TN 9400 2000-051
  8. Mitchell, G.W. et al., 2000, Hot cell facility (HCF) safety analysis report, SAND2000-2355
  9. U.S. Department of Energy, 1992, Hazard categorization and accident analysis techniques for compliance with DOE order 5480.23, nuclear safety analysis reports, DOE-STD-1027-92
  10. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1974, Assumptions used for evaluating the potential radiological consequences of a loss of coolant accident for pressurized water reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.4
  11. 10 CFR 100.11, 2012, Determination of exclusion area, low population zone, and population center distance, Nuclear Regulatory Commission