Biomaterials Research (생체재료학회지)

Korean Society for Biomaterials (한국생체재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cell-adhesive RGD peptide-displaying M13 bacteriophage/PLGA nanofiber matrices for growth of fibroblasts

  • Shin, Yong Cheol (Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong Ho (Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jin, Linhua (Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Min Jeong (Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Oh, Jin-Woo (Department of Nanomaterials Engineering, College of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Tai Wan (Department of Design, College of Arts, Pusan National University) ;
  • Han, Dong-Wook (Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2014.07.03
  • Accepted : 2014.08.29
  • Published : 2014.12.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: M13 bacteriophages can be readily fabricated as nanofibers due to non-toxic bacterial virus with a nanofiber-like shape. In the present study, we prepared hybrid nanofiber matrices composed of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid, PLGA) and M13 bacteriophages which were genetically modified to display the RGD peptide on their surface (RGD-M13 phage). Results: The surface morphology and chemical composition of hybrid nanofiber matrices were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining was conducted to investigate the existence of M13 bacteriophages in RGD-M13 phage/PLGA hybrid nanofibers. In addition, the attachment and proliferation of three different types of fibroblasts on RGD-M13 phage/PLGA nanofiber matrices were evaluated to explore how fibroblasts interact with these matrices. SEM images showed that RGD-M13 phage/PLGA hybrid matrices had the non-woven porous structure, quite similar to that of natural extracellular matrices, having an average fiber diameter of about 190 nm. Immunofluorescence images and Raman spectra revealed that RGD-M13 phages were homogeneously distributed in entire matrices. Moreover, the attachment and proliferation of fibroblasts cultured on RGD-M13 phage/PLGA matrices were significantly enhanced due to enriched RGD moieties on hybrid matrices. Conclusions: These results suggest that RGD-M13 phage/PLGA matrices can be efficiently used as biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References

  1. Ingber DE, Folkman J: Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1989, 109:317-330. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.1.317
  2. Juliano RL, Haskill S: Signal transduction from the extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1993, 120:577-585. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.120.3.577
  3. Meredith JE, Fazeli B, Schwartz MA: The extracellular matrix as a cell survival factor. Mol Biol Cell 1993, 4:953-961. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.4.9.953
  4. Thery M, Racine V, Pepin A, Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita JB, Bornens M: The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol 2005, 7:947-953. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1307
  5. Mo XM, Xu CY, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S: Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1883-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.042
  6. Fujihara K, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S: Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4139-4147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014
  7. Zhang YZ, Su B, Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S, Lim CT: Biomimetic and bioactive nanofi brous scaffolds from electrospun composite nanofibers. Int J Nanomed 2007, 2:623-638.
  8. Beletsi A, Leontiadis L, Klepetsanis P, Ithakissios DS, Avgoustakis K: Effect of preparative variables on the properties of poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide)- methoxypoly(ethyleneglycol) copolymers related to their application in controlled drug delivery. Int J Pharm 1999, 182:187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00058-7
  9. Ravichandran R, Ng CC, Liao S, Pliszka D, Raghunath M, Ramakrishna S, Chan CK: Biomimetic surface modification of titanium surfaces for early cell capture by advanced electrospinning. Biomed Mater 2012, 7:015001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015001
  10. Wei K, Li Y, Lei X, Yang H, Teramoto A, Yao J, Abe K, Ko FK: Emulsion electrospinning of a collagen-like protein/PLGA fibrous scaffold: Empirical modeling and preliminary release assessment of encapsulated protein. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:1526-1536.
  11. Chen DW, Hsu YH, Liao JY, Liu SJ, Chen JK, Ueng SW: Sustainable release of vancomycin, gentamicin and lidocaine from novel electrospun sandwich-structured PLGA/collagen nanofibrous membranes. Int J Pharm 2012, 430:335-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.010
  12. Pytela R, Pierschbacher MD, Ginsberg MH, Plow EF, Ruoslahti E: Platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa: member of a family of Arg-Gly-Aspspecific adhesion receptors. Science 1986, 231:1559-1562. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2420006
  13. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD: New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 1987, 238:491-497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2821619
  14. Staatz WD, Fok KF, Zutter MM, Adams SP, Rodriguez BA, Santoro SA: Identification of a tetrapeptide recognition sequence for the alpha2beta1 integrin in collagen. J Biol Chem 1991, 266:7363-7367.
  15. Ho MH, Wang DM, Hsieh HJ, Liu HC, Hsien TY, Lai JY, Ho LT: Preparation and characterization of RGD-immobilized chitosan scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005, 26:3197-3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.032
  16. Zhang L, Hum M, Wang M, Li Y, Chen H, Chu C, Jiang H: Evaluation of modifying collagen matrix with RGD peptide through periodate oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 73A:468-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30363
  17. Lee J, Cuddihy MJ, Kotov NA: Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art. Tissue Eng Part B 2008, 14:61-86. https://doi.org/10.1089/teb.2007.0150
  18. Smith GP, Petrenko VA: Phage display. Chem Rev 1997, 97:391-410. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960065d
  19. Dogic Z, Fraden S: Smectic phase in a colloidal suspension of semiflexible virus particles. Phys Rev Lett 1997, 78:2417-2420. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2417
  20. Frenkel D, Solomon B: Filamentous phage as vector-mediated antibody delivery to the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:5675-5679. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072027199
  21. Yoo SY, Kobayashi M, Lee PP, Lee SW: Early osteogenic differentiation of mouse preosteoblasts induced by collagen-derived DGEA-peptide on nanofibrous phage tissue matrices. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:987-996. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm1013475
  22. Zhu H, Cao B, Zhen Z, Laxmi AA, Li D, Liu S, Mao C: Controlled growth and differentiation of MSCs on grooved films assembled from monodisperse biological nanofibers with genetically tunable surface chemistries. Biomaterials 2011, 32:4744-4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.030
  23. Chung WJ, Oh JW, Kwak K, Lee BY, Meyer J, Wang E, Hexemer A, Lee SW: Biomimetic self-templating supramolecular structures. Nature 2011, 478:364-368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10513
  24. Wang J, Wang L, Li X, Mao C: Virus activated artificial ECM induces the osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells without osteogenic supplements. Sci Rep 2013, 3:1242.
  25. Merzlyak A, Indrakanti S, Lee SW: Genetically engineered nanofiber-like viruses for tissue regenerating materials. Nano Lett 2009, 9:846-852. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8036728
  26. Lee SW, Belcher AM: Virus-based fabrication of micro- and nanofibers using electrospinning. Nano Lett 2004, 4:387-390. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl034911t
  27. Chen G, Courey AJ: Generation of epitope-tagged proteins by inverse PCR mutagenesis. Biotechniques 1999, 26:814-816.
  28. Qi D, Scholthof KB: A one-step PCR-based method for rapid and efficient site-directed fragment deletion, insertion, and substitution mutagenesis. J Virol Methods 2008, 149:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.01.002
  29. Lee EJ, Lee JH, Shin YC, Hwang DG, Kim JS, Jin OS, Jin L, Hong SW, Han DW: Graphene oxide-decorated PLGA/collagen hybrid fiber sheets for application to tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomater Res 2014, 18:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2055-7124-18-18
  30. Atabaev TS, Jin OS, Lee JH, Han DW, Vu HHT, Hwang YH, Kim HK: Facile synthesis of bifunctional silica-coated core-shell Y2O3:Eu3+, Co2+ composite particles for biomedical applications. RSC Adv 2012, 2:9495-9501. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21332j
  31. Stewart S, Fredericks PM: Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of amino acids adsorbed on an electrochemically prepared silver surface. Spectrochim Acta A 1999, 55:1641-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(98)00294-7
  32. Apeldoorn AA, Manen HJ, Bezemer JM, Bruijn JD, Blitterswijk CA, Otto C: Raman imaging of PLGA microsphere degradation inside macrophages. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126:13226-13227. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0459936
  33. Filho PF, Freire PTC, Lima KCV, Filho JM, Melo FEA, Pizani PS: High temperature raman spectra of L-leucine crystals. Braz J Phys 2008, 38:131-137. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-97332008000100024
  34. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H: RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4385-4415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0
  35. Bellis SL: Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011, 32:4205-4210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029
  36. Tsai WB, Chen YR, Liu HL: RGD-conjugated crosslinked chitosan scaffolds for culture and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 2013, 44:17.
  37. Shin YM, Jo SY, Park JS, Gwon HJ, Jeong SI, Lim YM: Synergistic effect of dual-functionalized fibrous scaffold with BCP and RGD containing peptide for improved osteogenic differentiation. Macromol Biosci 2014. doi:10.1002/mabi.201400023.
  38. Masaeli E, Wieringa PA, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Sadri S, Blitterswijk CA, Moroni L: Peptide functionalized polyhydroxyalkanoate nanofibrous scaffolds enhance Schwann cells activity. Nanomedicine 2014. doi:10.1016/ j.nano.2014.04.008.

Cited by

  1. Design of virus-based nanomaterials for medicine, biotechnology, and energy vol.45, pp.15, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00287g
  2. Highly sensitive SERS analysis of the cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp peptide ligands of cells using nanogap antennas vol.10, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201500327
  3. Engineered M13 Nanofiber Accelerates Ischemic Neovascularization by Enhancing Endothelial Progenitor Cells vol.14, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-017-0074-x
  4. RGD peptide and graphene oxide co-functionalized PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering vol.4, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbx001
  5. Ternary Aligned Nanofibers of RGD Peptide-Displaying M13 Bacteriophage/PLGA/Graphene Oxide for Facilitated Myogenesis vol.2, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7150/ntno.22433
  6. Bacteriophage-based biomaterials for tissue regeneration vol.145, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.11.004
  7. Virus-Incorporated Biomimetic Nanocomposites for Tissue Regeneration vol.9, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071014
  8. Bioinspired RGD-Engineered Bacteriophage Nanofiber Cues against Oxidative Stress vol.20, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00640
  9. Probing molecular mechanisms of M13 bacteriophage adhesion vol.2, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0198-0