Biomaterials Research (생체재료학회지)

Korean Society for Biomaterials (한국생체재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biocompatibility and resorption pattern of newly developed hyaluronic acid hydrogel reinforced three-layer poly (lactide-co-glycolide) membrane: histologic observation in rabbit calvarial defect model

  • You, Hoon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Ung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, You-Kyoung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Bum-Chul (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) ;
  • Park, Jin-Young (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Noh, InSup (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2014.07.17
  • Accepted : 2014.08.19
  • Published : 2014.12.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility and resorption pattern in three-layer poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) membrane according to the concentrations of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel in rabbit calvarial defect model. Four standardized circular defects with 8 mm diameter were created on the four rabbit calvarium. Three-layer PLGA membranes (5% and 10% HA gel) were used as the test groups, both collagen membrane and monolayer PLGA membrane as the control groups. Results: After sacrificing the animals after 4 and 8 weeks, block sections were harvested and histological observation was performed. Pus formation was observed in a site on the three-layer PLGA membranes (with 10% HA gel) of 4 weeks group and initial inflammatory responses were observed on the three-layer PLGA membrane group. However, when compared to both the monolayer PLGA membrane group and collagen membrane group, the HA gel-reinforced three-layer PLGA membrane showed improved cell occlusion and retention period, showing the formation of the capsule-like structure. There was no definite difference between the results of the membranes fabricated with either 5% or 10% HA hydrogel. Conclusion: The HA reinforced three-layer PGLA membrane was retained longer than control group and showed good property in cell occlusion. Future study is under process to improve the inflammatory response of the three layer PLGA membranes, which were observed in this study.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Health & Welfare

References

  1. Postlethwaite AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH: Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type I, II, and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978, 75(2):871-875. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.2.871
  2. Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R: Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2003, 5:1-16. discussion.
  3. Sela MN, Kohavi D, Krausz E, Steinberg D, Rosen G: Enzymatic degradation of collagen-guided tissue regeneration membranes by periodontal bacteria. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003, 14(3):263-268. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140302.x
  4. Schneider D, Weber FE, Grunder U, Andreoni C, Burkhardt R, Jung RE: A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013, . doi:10.1111/ clr.12132.
  5. Hurzeler MB, Kohal RJ, Naghshbandi J, Mota LF, Conradt J, Hutmacher D, Caffesse RG: Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads. An experimental study in the monkey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998, 27(4):315-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80623-X
  6. Zhao S, Pinholt EM, Madsen JE, Donath K: Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000, 28(2):116-122. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0127
  7. Owens KW, Yukna RA: Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent 2001, 10(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200101000-00016
  8. Jung RE, Kokovic V, Jurisic M, Yaman D, Subramani K, Weber FE: Guided bone regeneration with a synthetic biodegradable membrane: a comparative study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 22(8):802-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02068.x
  9. Park JK, Yeom J, Oh EJ, Reddy M, Kim JY, Cho DW, Lim HP, Kim NS, Park SW, Shin HI, Yang DJ, Park KB, Hahn SK: Guided bone regeneration by poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) grafted hyaluronic acid bi-layer films for periodontal barrier applications. Acta Biomater 2009, 5(9):3394-3403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.019
  10. Shive MS, Anderson JM: Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997, 28(1):5-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00048-3
  11. von Arx T, Broggini N, Jensen SS, Bornstein MM, Schenk RK, Buser D: Membrane durability and tissue response of different bioresorbable barrier membranes: a histologic study in the rabbit calvarium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005, 20(6):843-853.
  12. Khil MS, Cha DI, Kim HY, Kim IS, Bhattarai N: Electrospun nanofibrous polyurethane membrane as wound dressing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003, 67(2):675-679.
  13. Toole BP: Hyaluronan in morphogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2001, 12(2):79-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/scdb.2000.0244
  14. Lee CT, Lee YD: Preparation of porous biodegradable poly(lactide-coglycolide)/ hyaluronic acid blend scaffolds: characterization, in vitro cells culture and degradation behaviors. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006, 17(12):1411-1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0617-5
  15. West DC, Kumar S: The effect of hyaluronate and its oligosaccharides on endothelial cell proliferation and monolayer integrity. Exp Cell Res 1989, 183(1):179-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(89)90428-X
  16. Kim NS: Evaluation on the bone regenerative capacity of hyaluronic acid applied poly (D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) membranes in rabbit calvarial defect. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010, 48(2):158-165. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.2.158
  17. Pulapura S, Kohn J: Trends in the development of bioresorbable polymers for medical applications. J Biomater Appl 1992, 6(3):216-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532829200600303
  18. Ohri R, Hahn SK, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS, Giachelli CM: Hyaluronic acid grafting mitigates calcification of glutaraldehyde-fixed bovine pericardium. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 70A(2):328-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30088
  19. Suzuki K, Anada T, Miyazaki T, Miyatake N, Honda Y, Kishimoto KN, Hosaka M, Imaizumi H, Itoi E, Suzuki O: Effect of addition of hyaluronic acids on the osteoconductivity and biodegradability of synthetic octacalcium phosphate. Acta Biomater 2013, . doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.005.
  20. Schmidmaier G, Baehr K, Mohr S, Kretschmar M, Beck S, Wildemann B: Biodegradable polylactide membranes for bone defect coverage: biocompatibility testing, radiological and histological evaluation in a sheep model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006, 17(4):439-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01242.x
  21. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV: The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med 2012, 10:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-81
  22. Marinucci L, Lilli C, Baroni T, Becchetti E, Belcastro S, Balducci C, Locci P: In vitro comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in bone regeneration. J Periodontol 2001, 72(6):753-759. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.753

Cited by

  1. Biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide-co-ε-caprolactone) block copolymers - evaluation as drug carriers for a localized and sustained delivery system vol.3, pp.41, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb01542a
  2. 젖산 및 글리콜산에서 합성된 PLGA 멤브레인의 특성과 생분해성에 관한 연구 vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2015.16.4.2958
  3. 5-Flurouracil microencapsulation and impregnation in hyaluronic acid hydrogel as composite drug delivery system for ocular fibrosis vol.3, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205x.2016.1182108
  4. Recent advances to accelerate re-endothelialization for vascular stents vol.8, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731417731546
  5. Preclinical in Vitro and in Vivo Assessment of Linear and Branched L-Valine-Based Poly(ester urea)s for Soft Tissue Applications vol.4, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00920