DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Malaysia's 13th General Election: Political Communication and Public Agenda in Social Media

  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

Everyone has a voice and can broadcast it to the world. We hear about the old maxim of media do not tell people what to think but what to think about. Under this theory or approach, a key function of political communication is to make the public think about an issue in a way that is favorable to the sender of the message. In a democracy, political communication is seen as crucial for the building of a society where the state and its people feel they are connected. Thus, this is a study on how social media (e.g., Facebook, blogs, and YouTube) were used in the domain of Malaysian politics during the 13th general election campaigning period in order to set the agenda to form public opinion. The study found that Facebook was the most popular social media tool that political parties actively engaged with during the 13th general election campaign period. Apart from that, issues pertaining to the election were significantly highlighted by the political parties in social media, especially Facebook. However, other issues that were also important to the people such as the economy, crime, and education were not sufficiently highlighted during the election campaign period. This indicates that the political parties influence the public on what to think about using social media.

Keywords

References

  1. Agee, W. K., Ault, P. H., & Emery, E. (1997). Introduction to mass communications (12th ed.). New York: Longman.
  2. Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: states, citizens, and new communications technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Crompton, J. (2008). Mixing friends with politics: a functional analysis of '08 Presidential candidates social networking profiles. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association 94th Annual Convention, San Diego, California.
  4. Gamble, M. W., & Gamble, T. K. (1989). Introducing mass communication (2nd ed.). US:McGraw-HIll.
  5. Graber, D. A., & SMith, J. M. (2005). Political communication faces 21st century. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02682.x
  6. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Massachusetts: Addison-Westley.
  7. Idid, Syed Arabi, & Chang, P. K. (2012). The media and public agenda among the Malay and Chinese communities during the 2008 Malaysian General Elections. Asian Social Science, 8(5), 107-115. doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n5p107
  8. Ismail, Syamsul Anuar, & Hasmzh, Zanuddin. (2008). Aktiviti blogging dan kandunagn blog sosiopolitik sebelum dan selepas pilihan raya umum ke-12: satu analisis [Blogging activities and content of social political blog before and after 12th general election: An analysis]. Journal Pengajian Media (Malaysian Journal of Media Studies), 10(1), 75-86
  9. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  10. Kushin, M. J., & Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting political on social network sites: exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday, 14(11).
  11. Lilleker, D. G. (2006). Key concepts in political communication. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  12. Liow, J. C. (2012). Malaysia's March 2008 general election: Understanding the new media factor. The Pacific Review, 25(3), 293-315. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2012.685096
  13. Mayfield, A. (2008). What is social media? Retrieved from http://www.icrossing.com/sites/default/files/what-is-social-media-uk.pdf
  14. Momoc, A. (2013). Social media-PR tools for Romanian politicians? Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 81, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.398
  15. Navarria, G. (2013). Malaysia after the Election: A paradigm shift? Retrieved from http://www.opendemocracy.net/giovanni-navarria/malaysia-after-electionparadigm-shift
  16. Newson, A., Houghton, D., & Patten, J. (2009). Blogging and other social media: Exploiting the technology and protecting the enterprise. Surrey: Gower Publishing Limited.
  17. Steenkamp, M., & Hyde-Clarke, N. (In Press). The use of Facebook for political commentary in South Africa. Telematics and Informatics.
  18. Stieglitz, S., Brockmann, T., & Linh, D. X. (July 15, 2012). Usage of social media for political communication. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Vietnam. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/pasics2012/22
  19. Sulaiman, Suhaimi. (April 2, 2008). Awani-Survey by Zentrum Future Studies Malaysia. Retrieved from http://suhaimisulaiman.blogspot.com/2008/04/awani-survey-byzentrum-future-studies.html
  20. Tham, Jen Sern & Hasmah, Zanudin. (2011). Reach and visibility: Perception and social marketing of AIDS patients in Malaysian media. Paper presented at the International Conference on Media and Communication (Mention 2011): Communication and Transformation: Progress and Paradox Hotel Equatorial, Bangi-Putrajaya.
  21. Wattal, S., Schuff D., Mandviwalla, M., & Williams, C. (2010). Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 669-688. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750700
  22. Weber, L. (2009). Marketing to the social web. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  23. Wills, D., & Reeves, S. (2007). Facebook as a political weapon: Information in social networks. British Politics 4(2), 265-281.
  24. Zahid, Syed Jaymal. (2013). Najib: Election 2013 first social media election, The Malaysian Insider. Retrieved from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/najib-election-2013-firstsocial-media-election
  25. Zittel, T. (2007). Lost in technology? Political parties and online-campaigning in mixed member electoral systems. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Pisa, Italy.
  26. Zúñiga, H. G. d., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x

Cited by

  1. Televised Political interviews: A Paradigm for Analysis vol.3, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2016.3.2.63
  2. Religion and media: a case study ofUtusan Malaysia's response to HIV/AIDS vol.29, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.964176