DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Triple Helix for Social Innovation: The Saemaul Undong for Eradicating Poverty

  • Rho, Wha-Joon (Park Chung Hee School of Policy and Saemaul, Yeungnam University)
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

This study aims to examine and develop a Triple Helix model for social innovation to eradicate pervasive poverty in developing countries. To do this, this study explores and analyzes the Rural Saemaul Undong (RSU), a rural community development movement for eradicating poverty that was driven by the South Korean government during the 1970s. First of all, this study explores the characteristics of the RSU and explains why the RSU was a social innovation. To support and explain why the RSU was a successful social innovation, this study analyzes the roles and activities of three distinct actor groups: the chief policymaker and his aides who presented the vision and purpose, or the "why" of the Saemaul Undong; central and local government officials who were the planners and managers who showed "how" to plan and drive it; and village Saemaul leaders as the drivers and coaches showing rural villagers "what" to do. Based on this analysis, this study develops an actor-based Triple Helix model for social innovation to eradicate poverty.

Keywords

References

  1. Agricultural Cooperative Association (1970), Agricultural Yearbook (in Korean), Seoul, Korea.
  2. Choi, Sang-Ho (1977), "The Background of Saemaul Leaders and the Motive of Their Roles", Korean Journal of Agricultural Education Society (in Korean), Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 78-96.
  3. Eom, Seok-Jin (2011a), "The Rural Saemaul Undong Revisited from the Perspective of Good Governance", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 17-43.
  4. Eom, Seok-Jin (2011b), "Synergy Between State and Rural Society for Development: An Analysis of the Governance System of the Rural Saemaul Undong in Korea", Korean Observer, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 583-620.
  5. Eom, Seok-Jin (2011c),"Between Mobilization and participation: A study on the roles of public officials in local administrations during the rural Saemaul Undong in the 1970s",Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp.97-122.
  6. Eoyang, G. (2002). Conditions for Self-organizing in Human Systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union Institute and University, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  7. Fukuyama, Francis (1999). Social Capital and Civil Society. The Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University, October 1, 1999.
  8. Funnell, Sue C. and Rogers, Patricia J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. Goh, Kun (2010), "Saemaul (New Village) Undong in Korea", Saemaul Undong 40th Anniversary International Symposium, Seoul, pp. 29-47.
  10. Goldstein, Jeffrey, Hazy, James K. and Benyamin B. Lichtenstein (2010). Complexity and the Nexus of Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Fonseca, Jose (2002). Complexity and Innovation in Organization. New York: Routledge.
  12. Hwang, Y. 2006. "Reexamination of Rural Saemaul Undong", Research on Agricultural History, 5(2): 17-53(in Korean).
  13. Han, Do-Hyun (1999), Structural Changes of the Rural Society during the 1960s, Research Institute of Korean Spiritual Culture (ed.), Research on Social Change During the 1960s: 1963-1970, Seoul: Baiksan-Seodang Publishing.
  14. Han, Do-Hyun (2010), The World Experienced by the Male Saemaul Leaders During the Saemaul Undong processes, Korean Society for Social History, Vol. 88.
  15. Hayden, F. Gregory (2006). Policymaking for a Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.
  16. Hazy, James K., Jeffrey Goldstein, and Benyamin B. Lichtenstein. (2007). Complex Systems Leadership Theory. ISCE Publishing.
  17. Hong, In-Geun (1965), "People's Movement for National Reconstruction", Shin Dong-A, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 154-169.
  18. Im, Tobin (2013), How Did the Saemaul Movement Succeed: Strategic Analysis Point of View, Journal of The Saemaul Undong & Community Development, Vol. 9, pp.73-105.
  19. Jun, Sang-In (2010), "Direct View and Re-recognition of Saemaul Undong", Review of the 40 year history and Future Perspective of Saemaul Undong in the 21st century, SMU 40th Anniversary International Symposium, 2010. 9. 30, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Kim, Hae-Dong et.al (1979), An Evaluation and Field Experimentation of Saemaul Movement in the Republic of Korea, Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, pp. 67-101.
  21. Kim, Young-Pyoung (2013), "Korean Saemaul Undong and Its Implications for the Rural Development of Emerging Countries", Journal of Saemaul Undong & Community Development, Vol. 9, pp.37-72.
  22. Ministry of Home Affairs (1980), History of Saemaul Undong: 1971-1980 (in Korean), Seoul, Korea.
  23. Oh, Ryue-Suck, et al, (2008a), Graphical Representation of Saemaul Undong System, Research Institute of Democracy, Seonggonghoe University, Seoul, Korea.
  24. Oh, Ryue-Suck, et al, (2008b), Collections of Saemaul Statistics, Research Institute of Democracy, Seonggonghoe University, Seoul, Korea.
  25. Park, Chung-hee (1979), Saemaul: Korea's New Community Movement. Seoul: Korea Textbook Co., ltd.
  26. Park, Gil-Sung (1999), "Demographic and Social Change in 1960s and Urbanization", Park, Gil-Sung, Kang Myung-Gu, Han Do-Hyun, Kang Sang-Hyun & Hong Seuk-Ryule (eds.), The Study of the Social Change in 1960s: 1963-1970, Seoul: Baeksanseodang Publishing, pp. 11-54.
  27. Park, Jin-Whan (1981), The Ignition Process of the Saemaul Undong: Ideology and Practice of the Saemaul Undong (in Korean), Research Institute of The Saemaul Undong, Seoul National University.
  28. Rho, Yukyeong (2013), A Study on Coaching Leadership and Emergence of Innovative Behavior in Saemaul Undong, Seoul: Graduate School, Korea University.
  29. Rho, Wha-Joon (2013a), Saemaul Undong of Korea: Generative Leadership and Emergence of the Social Value (in Korean), Seoul: Bubmoonsa.
  30. Rho, Wha-Joon (2013b), "The Role of Saemaul Leader as the social innovator", Journal of The Saemaul Undong & community Development, Vol. 9, pp. 1-35.
  31. Ryu, Byeung-Ryeong, Choi Bong-Dae & Oh Ryu-Suck (2001), Strategies for Modernization and Saemaul Undong (in Korean), Seoul: Baeksanseodang.
  32. Sinek, Simon, Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action, Penguin Group, 2009.
  33. So, Jin-Kwang, 2007. "Local governance and Saemaul Undong in Korea". Korean Journal of Local Autonomy (in Korean), Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 93-176.
  34. United Nations, The Millennium Development Goal Report 2012, United Nations, New York, 2012.
  35. Whang, In-jung. 1980. Integrative rural development in Korea: Evaluation and prospect of Saemaul Undong (in Korean). Seoul: Korean Rural Economics Institute.
  36. Whang, In-Jung. 1983. "Innovations in local administration for rural development in Korea". Journal of East and West Studies, 12(2): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265088308422695

Cited by

  1. Exploring political discussions by Korean twitter users vol.66, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2012-0089
  2. Quantifying the Triple Helix relationship in scientific research: statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0052-5
  3. Exploring persuasive message strategy for international aid campaigns: potential donors’ inter-attitudinal structure using Galileo model vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0065-0
  4. The affecting tourism development attitudes based on the social exchange theory and the social network theory pp.1741-6507, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1540438
  5. Research evaluation of Asian countries using altmetrics: comparing South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and China vol.117, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2884-6
  6. A Comparative Study on the Self-help Approach in Rural Development between Vietnam's New Rural Development and Korea's Saemaul Undong vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.jeai.2016.20.1.306
  7. Using the Quadruple Helix Model for evaluation of health science researches : Case study of D8 countries vol.38, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-08-2019-0156