Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Life-Cycle Categorical Variables of Quasi-Market SOC Public Enterprise

공기업 수명주기 분류변수 도출을 위한 기초연구 : 준시장형 SOC 공기업을 대상으로

  • Park, Dong Sun (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Shin, Wan Seon (Department of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 박동선 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 신완선 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
  • Received : 2014.10.07
  • Accepted : 2014.11.21
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The enterprise life cycle derived from the product life cycle consists of introduction, growth, maturity and decline. The enterprise tries to reach the growth stage early and stay at the maturity stage stably through expanding its businesses and investing for the new technology. The public enterprise is not different but its life cycle is more prone to be affected by the national development and policy. A typical example can be found in the case of the quasi market SOC public enterprise which spends massive amount of fund to provide social infrastructure. After the fulfillment of its mandated mission it is exposed to the pressure of a merger or a closure usually because large portion of the debt is directly linked to the national financial stability and credit ratings. This research is focused on the variables that influence the life cycle of the quasi market SOC public Enterprise for its future competitiveness is in connection with its normalization, advancement and rationalization. In this respect, categorical variables system centering on public characteristics and profitability drew eight categorical variables such as policy outcomes, public benefit, finance and business values etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthony, J. and Ramesh, K., Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices : a test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1992, Vol. 15, p 203-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90018-W
  2. Black, E., Life-cycle Impacts on the incremental Value- Relevance of Earnings and Cash Flow Measures. The Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 1998, Vol. 4, p 40-57.
  3. Bulan, L. and Yan, Z., The pecking order of financing in the firm's life cycle. Working paper, Bandeis University, 2007, p 24-47.
  4. Choi, H.S., Jang, J.I., and Shin, S.C., The Relative Relevance of Earnings and Cash Flow Measures in Each Life-Cycle Stage. The Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 2006, Vol. 135, No. 5, p 1339-1360.
  5. Choi, H.J. and Lee, S.W., The Role of the Management Control Systems in the Growth Stage of the Corporate Life-cycle. The Journal of Accounting, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 4, p 47-52.
  6. DeAngelo. and Stulz, R., Dividend policy and the earned/ contributed capital mix : a test of the life cycle theory. 2006, p 11-37.
  7. Dickinson, V., Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Working paper, University of Florida, 2007, p 6-45.
  8. Kim, G.Y., Research on Productivity of Public Institution, 2011, p 33-55.
  9. Kim, H.J. and Hwang, D.S., A Study on Ownership Structure Affecting Corporate Value. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1996, Vol. 19, No. 38, p 97-99.
  10. Ko, Y.Y., Accruals valuation and Earnings Management Based on Corporate Life Cycle, 2008, p 7-18.
  11. Kwon, Y.D., The Effect of Determination of Stock Price between Corporate Life Cycle and Factor of Organizing of Book Value. Korea Accounting Association, 1996, Vol. 21, No. 2, p 45-72.
  12. Lim, S.U. and Jung, Y.J., A Study of Six Sigma Project Selection Criteria by Comparing Private Corporate with Public Corporate. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2010, Vol. 33, No. 1, p 93-96.
  13. Liu, M., Accruals and managerial operating decisions over the firm life cycle. Working paper, The Pennsylvania State University, 2008, p 5-34.
  14. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H., A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, p 1161-1183. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
  15. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Direction of Reasonable Policy, 2013, p 1-8.
  16. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Public Institution Guide Book, 2013, p 21-42.
  17. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Plan on Preliminary Feasibility Study of Public Institution, 2013, p 1-9.
  18. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Management Evaluation Guide for Public Enterprises, 2013, p 9-26.
  19. Noh, D.M. and Kim, J.J., Enlightening Technology Valuation Considering product Life Cycle. Service Marketing Journal, 2013, Vol. 25, p 23-26.
  20. Park, J.S., Public Institution and National Policy. Korea institute of public finance, 2011, p 1-17.
  21. Shin, W.S., Kwak, C.K., and Park, Y.T., An Improvement Strategy for the Green Growth Policies of Korean Public Corporations. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2013, Vol. 36, No. 3, p 25-33.
  22. Yoon, T.B., Research on Process of Transition about Management Evaluation System for Public Institution, 2010, p 35-39.

Cited by

  1. 준시장형 SOC 공기업의 수명주기 분석과 효율적 관리방안에 관한 연구 vol.6, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5804/lhij.2015.6.4.165