디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제12권1호
  • /
  • Pages.37-50
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

운영체제 플랫폼 특성이 네트워크 효과와 운영체제 사용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A Study on the Effects of Operating Systems Platform Characteristics on the Network Effect and Intention to Use Operating Systems

  • 투고 : 2013.11.11
  • 심사 : 2014.01.20
  • 발행 : 2014.01.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 스마트폰 시장을 기업생태계 관점으로 바라보고 운영체제 플랫폼의 핵심 성공요인을 도출하고자한다. 그리고 제시한 요인들이 사용자수 증가에 따른 효용의 증가와 사용의도에 직접적으로 어떤 영향을 미치는지 검증하는데 있다. 이를 위해 운영체제 플랫폼의 주요 특성을 OS 호환성, OS향상가능성으로 제시하고, 사용자수에 따른 효용증가를 나타내는 네트워크 효과와 사용의도 간의 논리적 인과관계 설정하고 실증 분석했다. 연구결과, 운영체제의 OS호환성과 OS향상가능성은 네트워크 효과와 사용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과는 그동안 실증연구가 되지 않았던 운영체제 플랫폼 특성을 제시하고, 스마트폰 시장의 기업생태계 구축에 있어 플랫폼 특성이 어떤 역할을 했는지 논리적인 인과관계를 제시하여 학문적으로 뿐만 아니라 실무적으로도 크게 기여했다고 판단된다.

The purpose of this research is to look upon the smartphone market from the perspective of business ecosystems and to extract the critical success factors of OS platforms. Furthermore, this research aims to verify the effect of those factors on increasing utility resulting from the rising number of users as well as on intention of use. In order to do this, OS compatibility and OS upgradability were presented as the major characteristics of OS platforms and a logical causal relationship between network effect and intention to use which shows the increase of utility according to the number of users was established which was then followed by an empirical analysis. The results of the research showed that OS compatibility and OS upgradability both had positive effects on network effect and intention to use. By presenting the characteristics of OS platforms, a subject which has lacked pervious empirical studies, and establishing a logical causal relationship for the role platform characteristics play in the formation of business ecosystem in the smartphone market, it is expected that the findings of this research will contribute greatly not only academically but also in practical applications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. B. Costello and J. W. Osborne, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. practical assessment, Research & Evaluation, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 1-9, 2005.
  2. A. Pontiggia and F. Virili, Network effects in technology acceptance: laboratory experimental evidence, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 30, pp. 68-77, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.001
  3. C. C. Seepersad, F. Mistree, and J. K, Allen, A Quantitative approach for designing multiple product platforms for an evolving portfolio of products, Proceedings of the DECT'02: ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Montreal, Canada, Sep.29-Oct.2, pp. 579-592, 2002.
  4. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 328-388, 1981.
  5. C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and A. Will, SmartPLS 2.0(beta), Hamburg, Germany, 2005.
  6. D. Gefen and D. Straub, A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 16, pp. 91-109, 2005.
  7. D. W. Barclay, C. Higgins, and R. Thompson, The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as illustration, Technology Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 285-309, 1995.
  8. F. D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. G. A. Marcoulides, W. W. Chin, and C. Saunders, A critical look at partial least squares modeling, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 171-175, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650283
  10. H. E. A. Tinsley and D. J. Tinsley, Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 414-424, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414
  11. H. Nair, P. Chintagunta, and J. P. Dube, Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 23-58, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017034.98302.44
  12. J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd eds. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1994.
  13. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th eds. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006.
  14. J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance, Long Range Planning, Vol. 46, pp. 1-12, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
  15. J. F. Moore, Business ecosystems and the view from the firm, Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 31-75, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103
  16. J. Farrell and G. Saloner, Installed base and compatibility: predation, product preannouncements and innovation, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 940-955, 1986.
  17. J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics, The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 277-319, 2009.
  18. J. H. Kahn, Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: principles, advances, and applications, Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 684-718, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
  19. J. H. Pae and J. S. Hyun, Technology advancement strategy on patronage decision: the role of switching costs in high-technology markets, The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 19-27, 2006.
  20. J. J. Sosik, S. S. Kahai, and M. J. Piovoso, Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? a primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 5-36, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108329198
  21. K. Xing and M. Belusko, Design for upgradability algorithm: configuring durable products for competitive reutilization, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 130, No. 11, pp. 111102_1-111102_14, 2008.
  22. M. A. Schilling, Winning the standards race: building installed base and the availability of complementary goods, European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 265-274, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00005-5
  23. M. Cusumano, Cloud computing and SaaS as new computing platforms, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 27-29, 2010.
  24. M. Iansiti and R. Levien, Strategy as ecology, Harvard Business Review, March, pp. 1-10, 2004.
  25. M. Kahan and M. Klausner, Standardization and innovation in corporate contracting, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 713-770, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073747
  26. M. Kenny, and B. Pon, Structuring the smartphone industry: is the mobile internet OS platform the key?, Journal of Industry Competition, and Trade, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 239-261, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-011-0105-6
  27. M, Kotabe, A, Sahay, and PS, Aulakh, Emerging role of technology licensing in the development of global product strategy: conceptual framework and research propositions, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp. 73-88, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251889
  28. M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro, Network externalities, competition, and compatibility, American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 424-440, 1985.
  29. M. L. Tushman and L. Rosenkopf, On the organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol 14, pp. 311-347. 1992.
  30. M. Peltoniemi, Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems, E:CO, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 10-19, 2006.
  31. M. Tenenhaus, V. E. Vinzi, Y. M. Chaterlin, and C. Lauro, PLS path modeling, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 159-205, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  32. M. Wetzels, G. Odekerken-Schroder, and C. van Oppen, Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 177-195, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  33. N. Economides, Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities, American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 108-121, 1989.
  34. P. I. Jeffers, W. A. Muhanna, and B. R. Nault, Information technology and process performance: an empirical investigation of the interaction between IT and non-IT resources, Decision Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 703-734, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00209.x
  35. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 879-903, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  36. R. Garud and K. Kumaraswamy, Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of subsitution, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 93-109, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160919
  37. R. K. Henson and J. K. Roberts, Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice, Education and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 393-416, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
  38. R. M. Henderson and K. B. Clark, Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 9-30, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  39. S. Kondoh, Y. Umeda, and H. Yoshikawa, Devleopment of upgradability cellular machines for environmentally conscious products, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 381-384, 1998.
  40. T. Eisenmann, Managing proprietary and shared platforms. California Management Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 31-53, 2008.
  41. W. W. Chin, Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. vii-xvi, 1998.
  42. W. W. Chin and P. R. Newsted, Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In:R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage, pp. 307-342, 1999.

피인용 문헌

  1. 소셜벤처 창업초기에 플랫폼 전략의 도입과 영향에 관한 연구: 점프!의 사례를 중심으로 vol.12, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.4.201708.133