DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of the Design VE Process using VE Idea-DataBank System

설계 VE 프로세스 개선을 위한 VE Idea-DataBank System 구축에 관한 연구 - 한국도로공사 고속도로 건축공사를 대상으로 -

  • Park, Heetaek (Department of Architecture and Building Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Park, Chansik (Department of Architecture and Building Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Jung, Wooseob (Korea Expressway Corporation, Gyeongnam Regional Center)
  • 박희택 (중앙대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 박찬식 (중앙대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 정우섭 (한국도로공사 경남본부 시설팀)
  • Received : 2013.09.04
  • Accepted : 2013.11.22
  • Published : 2014.01.31

Abstract

Construction value engineering(VE) is often performed in the form of a short term review of designs, rather than during a regular workshop with a standardized work plan, and its application method is limited. Thus, tasks are performed by applying the method in reverse depending on the VE results, and function analysis, a key VE method, is omitted or only applied for the sake of formality. In addition, it is hard to expect great results from VE because of insufficient time and budget allowed to perform VE and a lack of understanding of VE procedures and methods. In particular, the methods used to store and reuse the tremendous amount of ideas and information created during the process of VE implementation is not systematic. Even the Korea Expressway Corporation, which has produced relatively systematic VE performance compared to other institutions, has had the above-mentioned problems. Therefore, this study aims to improve existing VE processes and suggest a method to efficiently store and retrieve VE information by analyzing the limitations of construction VE practice and the characteristics of VE for highway facilities as part of improving design VE performance.

건설 VE는 표준화된 작업계획에 의한 정규 워크샵이 아닌 단기간 설계검토 형식으로 업무가 수행되고 있으며, 활용되는 기법 또한 제한적이다. 이로 인해, VE 결과에 따라 기법의 내용을 역으로 맞추는 형태로 과업이 수행되고 있으며, VE의 핵심기법인 기능분석은 생략되거나 형식적으로 진행되는 경우가 많다. 또한, VE 수행시간 및 예산부족, VE 절차 및 기법의 이해부족 등으로 인해 VE 결과에 대한 큰 성과를 기대하기 어려우며, 특히, VE 수행과정상 창출되는 수많은 아이디어 정보를 축적 및 활용하는 방법이 체계적이지 못한 실정이다. 타 기관에 비해 비교적 체계적인 VE 수행으로 많은 성과를 내고 있는 한국도로공사에서도 상기 언급한 문제들이 발견되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 설계 VE 생산성을 향상시키기 위한 일환으로 국내 건설 VE 실무의 한계와 고속도로 시설 VE가 갖는 특성을 파악하여 기존 VE 프로세스를 개선하고, 다양한 VE 정보를 효율적으로 축적 및 활용할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, H. H. (2009). "A Process Model for Effective Idea Creation and Administration of Value Engineering at Design Phase Activity", Master's Thesis of Department of Architecture Graduate School of Namseoul Univ.
  2. Kim, S. B., Choi, J. W. (2004). "Assessment of Design Phase VE Process and Its Impacts", The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(5), pp. 749-757.
  3. Kwon, B. S. (2001). "A Study on Improvement of Subjec Selection Method for Value Engineering Process on Early Design Stage", Master's Thesis of Department of Architectural Engineering Graduate School of Dan-Kook Univ.
  4. Kwon, T. S. (2004). "A Study on the Methodology to Select Optimum Choice for Construction Value Engineering", Ph. D. Dissertation of Department of Architectural Engineering Graduate School of Yonsei Univ.
  5. Lee, J. H., Park, C. S. (2005). "The Conceptual Model of Web-Based Information System for Value Engineering (WISE) in Construction Project", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 6(3), pp. 167-177.
  6. Lee, S. H., Koo, K. J., Hyun, C. T. (2007). "Development of Case Based Value Engineering Support Tool", SAVE International 47th Anal Conference Proceedings, SAVE.
  7. Lin, G., Shen, G. Q., Sun, M., Kelly, J. (2011), "Identification of Key Performance Indicators for Measuring the Performance of Value Management Studies in Construction", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 137(9), pp. 698-706. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000348
  8. Mao, X., Zhang, X., AbouRizk, S. M. (2009). "Enhancing Value Engineering Process by Incorporating Inventive Problem-Solving Techniques", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 135(5), pp. 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000001
  9. Minchin Jr., E. R., Henriquez, N. R., King, A. M, Lewis, D. W. (2010). "Owners Respond: Preferences for Task Performance, Delivery Systems, and Quality Management", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 136(3), pp. 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2010)136:3(283)
  10. Minchin Jr., R. E. (2009). "Fall and Rise of the Largest Construction Manager-at-Risk Transportation Construction Project Ever", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 135(9), pp. 930-938. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000059
  11. Moon, S. W., HA, C. D., Yang. J. K. (2011). "Structured Idea Creation for Improving the Value of Construction Design", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 138(7), pp. 841-853.
  12. Park, I. W. (2008). "Development of Customer Satisfaction VE Process during Design Phase using Axiomatic Design Theory", Master's Thesis of Graduate School of The University of Seoul.
  13. Park, C. S., Lee. J. U., Choi, S. I. (2002). "Comprehensive Apparaisal of Value Engineering Practices in Domestic Construction Industry", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 3(2), pp. 67-74.
  14. Sadi A., Osama A. J., Al-Tamimi A. (2000), "Computerized System for Application of Value Engineering Methodology", Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 14(3), pp. 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2000)14:3(206)
  15. Seo, Y. C., Woo, Y. M., Lee, S. H. (2010). "A Study on Developing the Actual cases Database of Value Engineering on Building Construction", The Korea Institute of Building Construction, 10(2), pp. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.2.067
  16. Shen, Q., Liu, G. (2003). "Critical Success Factors for Value Management Studies in Construction", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 129(5), pp. 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(485)
  17. Townsend, K., Lingard, H., Bradley, L., Brown, K. (2012). "Complicated Working Time Arrangements: Construction Industry Case Study", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 138(3), pp. 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000436
  18. Yu, W., Wang, K. W. (2012). "Best Value or Lowest Bid? A Quantitative Perspective", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 138(1), pp. 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000414

Cited by

  1. Calculation Model for Function & Cost Score based on Normalization Method in Design VE vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.4.098
  2. A Preliminary Study of Prototype for Improving VE Workshop Phase based on BIM vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.3.113
  3. The Influence Analysis of Value Engineering for the Public Empoyer's Decision Marking - Focused on the Project Life Cycle - vol.16, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.2.012
  4. BIM-based idea bank for managing value engineering ideas vol.35, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.015