DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Capillary Barrier on Soil Salinity and Corn Growth at Saemangeum Reclaimed Tidal Land

  • Lee, Sanghun (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Su-Hwan (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Bae, Hui-Su (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Jang-Hee (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Oh, Yang-Yul (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Noh, Tae-Hwan (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Geon-Hwi (National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2014.09.02
  • Accepted : 2014.11.21
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Salt accumulation at soil surface is one of the most detrimental factors for crop production in reclaimed tidal land. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of capillary barriers beneath the soil surface on dynamics of soil salts at coarse-textured reclaimed tidal land. A field experiment was conducted at Saemangeum reclaimed tidal land for two years (2012-2013). Capillary barriers ($3.5{\times}12m$) were treated with crushed-stone, oyster shell waste, coal briquette ash, coal bottom ash, rice hull and woodchip at 40-60 cm depth from soil surface. Silage corn (Zea mays) was cultivated during the experimental period and soil salinity was monitored periodically. Soil salinity was significantly reduced with capillary barrier compared to that of control. Oyster shell waste was one of the most effective capillary barrier materials to control soil salinity at Saemangeum reclaimed tidal land. At the first growing season capillary barrier did not influence on corn growth regardless of types of the material, but plant biomass and withering rate of corn were significantly improved with capillary barrier at the second growing season. The results of this study showed that capillary barrier was effective on the control of soil salinity and improvement of corn growth, which indicated that capillary barrier treatment can be considered one of the best management practices for stable crop production at Saemangeum reclaimed tidal land.

Keywords

References

  1. Bevre, L. 1988. Silage making in round bales. Buscap Og. Avdratt. 40:100-103.
  2. Guo, G., K. Araya, H. Jia, Z. Zhang, K. Ohomiya, and J. Matsuda. 2006. Improvement of salt-affected soils, Part 1: Interception of capillarity. Biosys. Engr. 94:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.01.012
  3. Jung, M.Y. 2009. Development of technology for the resource recycling and processing of coal briquette ash. Project report. Semyung University, Jecheon, Korea.
  4. Keum, D.H. 2012. Development of new grain drying system and electric power plant using the rice husk energy for rice processing complex. RDA, Suwon. Korea.
  5. Kim, H.W. 2013. Analysis of soil characteristics of farming sites in Saemangeum reclaimed land. Jeonbuk National University. Master thesis. Jeonju, Korea.
  6. Kim, S.S., S.R. Lee, K.H. Han, and I.S. U. 1997. Underdrainage effects on soil salinity and growth of rice in Gyehwa reclaimed saline land. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 42:61-67.
  7. Kwon, H.B., C.W. Lee, B.S. Jun, J.D. Yun, S.Y. Weon, and B. Koopman. 2004. Recycling waste oyster shells for eutrophication control. Resear. Conserv. Recy. 41:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.08.005
  8. Lee, K.B., S.W. Hwang, S.H. Lee. 2012. Management plan for diverse utilization of reclaimed tidal land. Soc. Agric. Res. Reclaimed Land. 10:18-28.
  9. Lee, S., H.S. Bae, S.H. Lee, J.G. Kang, H.K. Kim, K.B. Lee, and K.H. Park. 2013a. Effect of soil salinity levels on silage barley growth at Saemangeum reclaimed tidal land. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 46:365-372. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.5.365
  10. Lee, S., H.K. Kim, S.W. Hwang, and K.B. Lee. 2013b. Changes of soil properties with various soil amendments in Saemangeum reclaimed tidal saline soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 46:281-287. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.4.281
  11. Lee, S., H.S. Bae, H.K. Kim, T.H. Noh, and G.H. Lee. 2014. Temporal variations on soil salinity and cation displacement at Saemangeum and Yeongsangang reclaimed tidal lands. J. Agri. Chem. Environ. 3:121-129.
  12. Li, X., S.X. Chang, and K.F. Salifu. 2013. Soil texture and layering effects on water and salt dynamics in the presence of a water table: a review. Environ. Rev. 21:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2012-0036
  13. Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, FL, USA.
  14. Park, D.K. and J.H. Seung. 2013. Policy on boost of selfsufficiency rate of grain. 2013 Agricultural outlook. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Seoul.
  15. Park, H.K., S.W. Yoo, and M.Y. Jung. 2010. Properties of the sintered eco-brick according o the unburned carbon content of the coal briquette ash. J. Korean Inst. Res. Recyc. 19:16-23.
  16. Park, H.S., J.H. Oh, S.Y. Park, H.W. Sin, and J.W. Moon. 2012. A research on noncombustible flooring using the bottom ash. Korean Ins. Fire Sci. Engr. 2012 Spring Meeting. 460-464.
  17. RDA. 2000a. Standard agricultural manuals for corn cultivation. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
  18. RDA. 2000b. Method of soil and plant analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
  19. RDA. 2012. Analysis standards for the research investigation of Agricultural Science and Technology. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
  20. Rooney, D.J., K.W. Brown, and J.C. Thomas. 1998. The effectiveness of capillary barriers to hydraulically isolate salt contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Poll. 104:403-411. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004966807950
  21. Seo, D.W. 2011. Desalinization and resalinization management plan on reclaimed land. Rural Environ. Engr. J. 112:73-87.
  22. Zhu, J., N. Tremblay, and Y. Liang. 2012. Comparing SPAD and at LEAF values for chlorophyll assessment in crop species. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92:645-648. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2011-100