DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등 과학 교사들의 교사 공동체 내에서의 학습의 특징과 인식적 믿음의 변화

Characteristics of Teacher Learning and Changes in Teachers' Epistemic Beliefs within a Learning Community of Elementary Science Teachers

  • 투고 : 2014.09.28
  • 심사 : 2014.11.14
  • 발행 : 2014.11.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of teacher learning and changes in teachers' epistemic beliefs within a learning community of elementary science teachers. Three in-service elementary teachers who majored in elementary science education in a doctoral course of a graduate school of education participated in the study, and learning activities in the teachers' beginning learning community provided a context for the study. Data sources included field notes produced by the researcher who engaged jointly in the teacher learning community as a coach, audio-recordings of the teachers' narratives, and artifacts generated by the teachers during the process of teacher learning. Complementary analyses of these multiple sources of data revealed that epistemic beliefs of the three elementary teachers were different and that each teacher made a different plan of science instruction based on his own epistemic belief even after the learning experiences within the teacher community. It was therefore suggested that science teacher education programs should be organized in consideration of the nature of teachers as constructivist learners and their practical resources.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
  2. Bryan, L. A. & Tippins, D. J.(2006). Employing case-based pedagogy within a reflection orientation to elementary science teacher preparation. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education (pp. 299-315). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  3. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
  4. Choi, N. J. & Lim, B. Y. (2013). A case study of the development stages of an early childhood teachers' learning community. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(5), 401-429.
  5. Chung, A., Maeng, S.-H., Lee, S.-K. & Kim, C.-J. (2007). Pre-service science teachers' areas of practice concern and reflections on the science classes in studentteaching. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 893-906.
  6. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
  7. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 83-106). New York: Falmer Press.
  8. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002005
  9. Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409-434). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Feucht, F. C. (2010). Epistemic climate in elementary classrooms. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 55-93). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics, 68(Suppl. 7), S52-S59.
  12. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  13. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E. & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  14. Han, S.-H. & Paik, S.-H. (2005). A study on the characteristics of science teacher associations according to organization process, aims of activities, and forms of linkage. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 25(7), 801-810.
  15. Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V. & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  16. Kim, H., Chung, K. & Lee, H. (2013). Identity development of science teachers involved in teacher communities: Based on the theory of "community practice". Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.390
  17. Lee, S.-K., Oh, P. S., Kim, H., Lee, G., Kim, C.-J. & Kim, H.-B. (2009). A review of research perspectives on science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and practical knowledge. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2009.26.1.27
  18. Lim, Y.-J. & Na, S.-I. (2011). The relationship between learning community activity and teaching competence of technology teachers in middle schools. Journal of the Korean Technology Education, 11(1), 104-127.
  19. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  20. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  21. National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  22. Oh, P. S. (2013). Secondary science teachers' thoughts on 'good' science teaching. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.405
  23. Oh, P. S. & Ahn, Y. (2013). An analysis of classroom discourse as an epistemic practice: Based on elementary science classrooms. Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 269-284.
  24. Oh, P. S., Lee, S.-K., Lee, G., Kim, C.-J., Kim, H.-B., Jeon, C. & Oh, S. (2008). Methodological review of research literature on the expertise of science teachers. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 28(1), 47-66.
  25. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  26. Seo, K. (2005a). Reflection and practice: On the professional development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 285-310.
  27. Seo, K. (2005b). The fallacy and possibilities of reflective teacher education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 22(3), 307-332.
  28. Seo, K. (2008). A case study on out-of-school teacher learning community. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(2), 53-80.
  29. Seo, K. (2013). A community approach to teacher learning. Education Science Studies, 44(3), 161-191.
  30. So, K.-H. (2009). Teacher learning: How and what teachers learn. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.27.3.200909.005
  31. Sykes, G. & Bird, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 18, 457-521.
  32. Yoon, H.-G. (2013). Facilitating productive reflection of pre-service elementary teachers through reflective journal writing and discussion about science peer teaching practice. Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 113-126.
  33. Yoon, H.-G. (2014). Facilitating pre-service elementary teachers' productive reflection on their science teaching through meta-analysis of their reflective journals. Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 322-334. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.322

피인용 문헌

  1. Exploration of Discursive-Epistemic Mechanisms in High School Earth Science Lessons vol.36, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.4.390
  2. Effects of Modeling-Based Science Inquiry Instruction on Elementary Students' Learning in the Unit of Seasonal Changes vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.2.265
  3. 대안적 인지 이론으로서 '자원 기반 관점'에 대한 이론적 고찰과 시험 적용 vol.35, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.0971
  4. A Qualitative Research on Experience with Participation in Lesson Study Group in a School vol.33, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2016.33.3.319
  5. A Comparative Study on Cooperative Interaction in the Teacher’s Learning Community : Focused on Elementary Mathematics Lessons vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.02.28.1.75
  6. 과학 학습의 지식구성 과정에 대한 실제적 인식론 분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.2.173
  7. 교사학습공동체 활동을 한 초임중등과학교사의 과학 탐구에 대한 이해 vol.39, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.2.221