KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE (한국작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Crop Science (한국작물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth and Yield Components Responses to Delayed Planting of Soybean in Southern Region of Korea

남부지역 콩 만파에 따른 품종별 생육 및 수량반응

  • Park, Hyeon-Jin (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Han, Won-Young (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Oh, Ki-Won (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Tae (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Ouk (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Byong-Won (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Ko, Jong-Min (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Baek, In Youl (Div. of Legume and Oil Crop Research, Dept. of Functional Crop, NICS, RDA)
  • 박현진 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 한원영 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 오기원 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 김현태 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 신상욱 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 이병원 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 고종민 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부) ;
  • 백인열 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기능성작물부)
  • Received : 2014.05.29
  • Accepted : 2014.09.01
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Double cropping system including paddy field soybean is widely adopted nationwide, due to rise in market price and its higher income than paddy field rice. Sowing date of soybean as a second crop is being delayed depending on first crop's growth period and harvesting time. Due to the increased temperature in October and delayed first frost date, soybean could be harvested without frost damage even in late-plating. Therefore, selection of soybean cultivar which is appropriate for this environment is very important. The effect of sowing date and genotype of soybean on growth and yield was investigated for three planting dates (June 20, July 5, and July 20) with ten cultivars developed for soy-pate production, to figure out plant development and yield pattern in delayed planting. As planting date is delayed, plant height and pod number was decreased and this pattern was more clearly detected in mid-late maturity cultivars. Hundred-seed weight did not show significant changes even in late planting, due to compensations between yield components. Yield reduction of July 20 in contrast to that of June 20 showed that Nampung (9.6%) showed the least yield decline. Maximum yield was achieved from Daepung, Taekwang, and Uram among other soybean cultivars in late planting. Shortening of growth period was strongly detected in reproductive stage while length of vegetative stage was regularly maintained in both early and mid-late maturity cultivars.

본 연구는 장류용 콩 품종의 논 재배 시 만파에 따른 생육 및 수량성 변이를 검토하기 위하여 경남 밀양에서 2012년부터 2013년에 걸쳐 수행하였다. 이용된 품종은 대원콩, 남풍, 대풍, 새단백, 선유, 우람, 천상, 태광 등의 중만생종품종과 참올, 황금올의 조생종 품종이었으며 6월 20일, 7월 5일, 7월 20일 세 차례에 걸쳐 파종하였다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 경장은 중만생종에서 만파할수록 대체로 감소하였으며 조생종에서는 유의한 변화가 관찰되지 않았다. 7월 20일 파종 시 분지수는 태광, 대풍, 선유, 참올 등에서 많이 발생하였고 마디수는 우람, 천상에서 가장 많았다. 2. 대부분 품종에서 6월 20일 파종 시에 가장 많은 협수를 기록하였으나 대풍, 우람, 천상은 7월 5일 파종 시에 오히려 협수가 많았다. 3. 만파 시 백립중은 적기 파종과 비교하였을 때 감소하였으며 수량은 적기 파종과 만파 시 모두 대풍, 태광, 우람 순으로 가장 높았다. 4. 만파에 따른 수량감소율은 남풍이 9.6%로 가장 낮아 만파적응성이 가장 높은 품종인 것으로 보인다. 5. 파종기에서 개화기까지의 기간은 파종기가 늦춰지더라도 비교적 일정하였으나 개화기에서 성숙기까지는 만파할수록 크게 단축되었다. 중만생종 중 선유, 조생종 중 황금올은 등숙기간의 단축이 가장 적어 만파에 따른 영향을 가장 적게 받는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akhter, M., and C. H. Sneller. 1996. Yield and yield components of early maturing soybean genotypes in the mid-south. Crop Sci. 36 : 877-882. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X0036000400010x
  2. Baek, I. Y., W. Y. Han, D. C. Shin, S. T. Kang, J. M. Ko, S. O. Shin, N. S. Kang, K. Y. Park, H. T. Kim, M. G. Choung, S. K. Oh, D. Y. Suh, H. Y. Kim, H. T. Yun, J. S. Park, K. S. Ha, J. H. Jeong, C. K. Son, D. S. Kang, and Y. D. Kim. 2005. A new tofu and soy-paste soybean cultivar, "Seonyu" with large seed and early maturity. Kor. J. Breed. 37(4) : 257-258.
  3. Board, J. E., and B. G. Harville. 1998. Late-planted soybean yield response to reproductive source/sink stress. Crop Sci. 38 : 763-771. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030024x
  4. Board, J. E., M. Kamal, and B. G. Harville. 1992. Temporal importance of greater light interception to increased yield in narrow-row soybean. Agron. J. 84 : 575-579. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040006x
  5. Board, J. E. and Q. Tan. 1995. Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield components and number. Crop Sci. 39 : 846-851.
  6. Boquet, D. J. 1990. Plant-Population Density and Row Spacing Effects on Soybean at Post-Optimal Planting Dates. Agron J. 82 : 59-64. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010013x
  7. Calvino, P. A., V. O. Sadras, and F. H. Andrade. 2003. Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas. Eur. J. Agron. 19(2) : 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00050-3
  8. Chen, G. H. and P. Wiatrak. 2010. Soybean development and yield are influenced by planting date and environmental conditions in the southeastern coastal plain, United States. Agron. J. 102 : 1731-1737. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0219
  9. Cho, J. W., S. Y. Lee, S. K. Kang, and C. S. Kim. 2006. Yield and Ecological Characteristics of Soybean in Drained-Paddy Field. Jour. Agri. Sci. 33(2) : 141-147.
  10. Choi, K. J. 1994. Effects of excessive water stress on the growth and yield of soybean. Seoul Natl. Univ. Ph.D. Thesis pp. 74.
  11. Coward, L., N. C. Barnes, K. D. Setchell, and S. Barnes. 1993. Genistein, daidzein, and their. beta-glycoside conjugates: antitumor isoflavones in soybean foods from American and Asian diets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41(11) : 1961-1967. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00035a027
  12. Cox, W., and J. H. Cherney. 2011. Growth and yield responses of soybean to row spacing and seeding rate. Agron J. 103 : 123-128. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0316
  13. Egli, D. B., 1998. Seed biology and the yield of grain crops. CAB International, Oxford, p. 178.
  14. Egli, D. B., and W. P. Bruening. 2000. Potential of early-maturing soybean cultivars in late plantings. Agron J, 92(3) : 532-537. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.923532x
  15. Egli, D. B., and P. L. Cornelius. 2009. A regional analysis of the response of soybean yield to planting date. Agron J, 101(2) : 330-335. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0148
  16. Evans, L. T. 1996. Crop evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 500.
  17. Fakui, I., and R. Ito. 1951. Fertility of the soybean affected in short period by the excessive soil moisture content at different growing period. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 20(3-4) : 271-273.
  18. FAOSTAT. 2012. Agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistical database.
  19. Frederick, J. R., C. R. Camp, and P. J. Bauer. 2001. Droughtstress effects on branch and mainstem seed yield and yield components of determinate soybean. Crop Sci. 41 : 759-763. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.413759x
  20. Fukui, J. 1965. Physiology and ecological studies of soybean in relation to soil moisture condition. J. Central Agri. Exp. Sta. 9 : 1-68.
  21. Hany A. El-Shemy. 2011. Soybean Physiology and Biochemistry. Rijeka: InTech. 488.
  22. Imaizumi, T. and S. A. Kay. 2006. Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 11(11) : 550-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.004
  23. Jung, K. Y., E. S. Yun, C. Y. Park, J. B. Hwang, Y. D. Choi, and K. D. Park. 2011. Stress Day Index to Predict Soybean Yield response by subsurface drainage in poorly drained sloping paddy fields. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(5) : 702-708 https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.5.702
  24. Kim, D. K., S. U. Chon, and B. G. Heo. 2006. Effect of no-tillage on soybean yield and weed emergence in drained paddy field condition in Jeonnam province. Korean J. Community Living Sci. 17(3) : 89-97.
  25. Kim, D. K., J. G. Choi, H. G. Park, H. R. Shin, S. T. Yoon, K. D. Lee, and Y. S. Rim. 2013. Ecological Characteristics and Yield of Major Soybean Cultivars at Different Sowing Times in Southern Korea. Korean J. Crop Sci. 58(1) : 57-66. https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2013.58.1.057
  26. Kim, H. T. 2013. A new tofu and soy-paste soybean cultivar "Cheonsang", starting to seed supply this year. 2013. Korea Advanced Farmers Association. 50(2) : 40.
  27. Kim, H. T., I. Y. Baek, J. M. Ko, W. Y. Han, K. Y. Park, K. W. Oh, H. T. Yun, J. K. Moon, S. O. Shin, S. L. Kim, Y. J. Oh, J. H. Lee, J. K. Choi, C. H. Kim, S. S. Lee, Y. J. Jang, D. K. Kim, C. K. Son, D. S. Kang, and Y. D. Kim. 2010. A new soy-paste soybean cultivar, "Nampung" with disease resistance, good combining adaptability and high yielding. Kor. J. Breed. Sci. 42(6) : 721-726.
  28. Kim, H. T., J. M. Ko, I. Y. Baek, M. G. Jeon, W. Y. Han, K. Y. Park, B. W. Lee, Y. H. Lee, C. S. Jeong, K. W. Oh, T. J. Ha, J. K. Moon, H. T. Yun, and J. K. Lee. 2011. Poster presentation : A new tofu soybean cultivar "Saedanbaek", with the highest protein content. Kor. J. Breed. Sci. 43 : 70.
  29. Kim, S. D., E. H. Hong, Y. H. Lee, Y. H. Hwang, Y. H. Moon, H. S. Kim, E. H. Park, Y. G. Seong, Y. H. Kim, W. H. Kim, Y. H. Ryu, and R. K. Park. 1992. Resistant to disease, good in seed quality, high yielding and widely adapted new soybean variety "Taekwangkong". Res. Rept. RDA(U&I). 32(2) : 11-15.
  30. Kim, S. D., K. Y. Park, Y. H. Kim, H. T. Yun, Y. H. Lee, S. H. Lee, Y. K. Seung, E. H. Park, Y. H. Hwang, Y. H. Ryu, C. J. Hwang, and Y. S. Kim. 1998. A new soybean variety for soypaste with large seed and disease resistant "Daewonkong". RDA. J. Crop Sci. 40(2) : 107-111.
  31. Kim, Y. H., S. D. Kim, and E. H. Hong. 1994. characteristics of soy sprouts cultivated with soybean for sprout. RDA. J. Agri. Sci. 36(2) : 107-112.
  32. Kumudini, S. V., P. K. Pallikonda, and C. Steele. 2007. Photoperiod and e-genes influence the duration of the reproductive phase in soybean. Crop Sci. 47 : 1510-1517. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.10.0662
  33. Kwon, S. H., J. H. Oh, J. R. Kim, H. S. Song, and B. W. Kim. 1975. Articles : Diversity of Protein and Oil Contents of the Korean Native Soybean Seeds II. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 7(1) : 40-44.
  34. Kwon, Y. W., and H. S. Lee. 1988a. The issue of physiological and cultivation environment on soybean. RDA Symp. 3 : 68-95.
  35. Kwon, Y. W., and M. K. Lee. 1988b. Physiological responses of soybean plants to flooding at the vegetative growth and the flowering stage. Res. Rept. RDA 31 : 289-300.
  36. Messina, M., and V. Messina. 2010. The role of soy in vegetarian diets. Nutrients 2 : 855-888. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2080855
  37. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. 1989. Basic technologies for paddy field crop cultivation.
  38. Ministry of food and drug safety. 2003-2012. Production of food and food additives.
  39. Mochizuki, T., and S. Matsumoto. 1991. Varietal differences of wet endurance in autumn soybean plants. Jpn J. Crop Sci. 60(3) : 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.60.380
  40. Park, K. Y., J. K. Moon, H. T. Yun, Y. H. Lee, S. L. Kim, Y. H. Ryu, Y. H. Kim, J. H. Ku, J. H. Roh, E. S. Lee, K. S. Ha, I. J. Kim, C. K. Son, S. K. Kim, S. D. Kim, and H. P. Moon. 2005. A new soybean cultivar for fermented soyfood and tofu with high yield, "Daepung". Korean J. Breed. 37(2) : 111-112.
  41. Pedersen, P. and J. G. Lauer. 2003. Soybean agronomic response to management systems in the upper Midwest. Agron. J. 95 : 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1146
  42. Pedersen, P., and J. G. Lauer. 2004. Soybean growth and development in various management systems and planting dates. Crop Sci. 44(2) : 508-515. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.5080
  43. RDA. 2012a. Criteria for agricultural research and investigation. 414-430.
  44. RDA. 2012b. Standard guide for soybean cultivation-116. 136-137.
  45. Saliba, M. R., L. E. Schreder, S. S. Hirano, and C. D. Upper. 1982. Effect of freezing field-grown soybean plants at various stages of podfill on yield and seed quality. Crop Sci. 22 : 73-77. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200010016x
  46. SAS Institute Inc. 2009. SAS/STAT(R)9.2 User's Guide, Second Edition. Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc.
  47. Shimada, S. 2008. Enhancing Soybean Productivity in the Paddy Fields in Japan. International crop science congress & exhibition (ICSC) 3-4.
  48. Shin, D. C., H. S. Suh, and K. Y. Chang. 1992. Studies on limiting time of soybean sowing in southern region of Korea. The effect of different sowing times on the variability of characteristics in soybeans. Res. Rept. RDA (U&I) 34(1) : 40-46.
  49. Statistics Korea. 2013. Agricultural Area Survey.
  50. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2014. Oilseeds: World markets and trade. 2013/14 forecast. Foreign agricultural service/USDA, office of global analysis.
  51. Wiebold, B. 2001. Soybean plants killed before maturity possess grain that remains green. Soy Facts. Missouri Univ. Agron. Ext. Publ. http://www.psu.missouri.edu/soyx Accessed May 12, 2006.
  52. Zhang, Q. Y., Q. l. Gao, S. J. Herbert, Y. S. Li, and A. M. Hashemi. 2010. Influence of sowing date on phenological stages, seed growth and marketable yield of four vegetable soybean cultivars in North-eastern USA. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5(18) : 2556-2562.

Cited by

  1. Growth and Yield Responses of Soybean to Planting Density in Late Planting vol.60, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2015.60.3.343
  2. Responses of Soybean Yield to High Temperature Stress during Growing Season: A Case Study of the Korean Soybean vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2016.18.4.188