한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

체계적 분석 기법을 이용한 의미기반 이미지검색 분야 고찰에 관한 연구

A Systematic Review on Concept-based Image Retrieval Research

  • 정은경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보전공)
  • 투고 : 2014.12.05
  • 심사 : 2014.12.14
  • 발행 : 2014.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

디지털 기술과 인터넷의 발달로 인해 이미지 생산, 유통, 이용이 활발하게 이루어지고 있으며, 이미지 검색에 관한 연구도 증가하는 추세이다. 이미지검색 분야는 내용기반과 의미기반으로 나뉘어 연구가 수행되어왔으며, 문헌정보학 관점에서는 특히 의미기반의 색인과 검색에 주목해왔다. 본 연구는 체계적인 분석기법을 이용하여 의미기반 이미지검색 분야 연구 집적의 분석결과를 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 데이터는 Web of Science 수록된 문헌정보학(Information Science/Library Science)분야의 이미지검색 논문 및 학술회의 논문 총 282건을 대상으로 하였으며, 국내 연구와 비교를 위해서는 DBpia에 수록된 문헌정보학 분야의 이미지검색 논문 35건을 수집하였다. 데이터 분석 과정은 우선 개괄적인 현황을 파악하기 위해서 서지사항을 분석하였고, 이와 함께 내용분석을 통한 체계적 분석 고찰을 수행하였다. 연구 결과 이미지 검색은 기존 연구에서 밝힌 바와 같이 의미기반 이미지 검색이 주된 흐름이며, 그 중에서도 이미지 색인과 기술 분야, 이미지 요구와 검색행태 분야의 연구가 주를 이루는 것으로 나타났다. 최근 연구 경향으로 주목할 만한 분야는 집합적 색인, 다언어/다문화 환경에서의 색인과 이미지 요구, 감정색인과 접근 등이다. 이용자 중심의 이미지 검색 연구 측면에서는 특정 이용자 그룹 중에서 대학생이나 대학원생이 주된 연구 대상 이용자 그룹이며 이 외에도 이미지를 업무에 사용하는 이용자 그룹에 대한 연구가 주된 경향이다. 최근에는 일반 이용자를 대상으로 일상생활 환경에서 이미지검색에 관한 연구가 등장하기 시작했다. 국내 연구와 비교하면, 논문의 수적인 차이를 제외하면 세부 연구 주제에 있어서 상당히 유사한 분포를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 지금까지의 이미지 검색 분야의 연구 집적을 조명하며, 향후 발전적 방향을 제시하는데 있어서 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

With the increased creation, distribution, and use of image in context of the development of digital technologies and internet, research endeavors have accumulated drastically. As two dominant aspects of image retrieval have been considered content-based and concept-based image retrieval, concept-based image retrieval has been focused in the field of Library and Information Science. This study aims to systematically review the accumulated research of image retrieval from the perspective of LIS field. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, two data sets were prepared: a total of 282 image retrieval research papers from Web of Science, and a total of 35 image retrieval research from DBpia in Kore for comparison. For data analysis, systematic review methodology was utilized with bibliographic analysis of individual research papers in the data sets. The findings of this study demonstrated that two sub-areas, image indexing and description and image needs and image behavior, were dominant. Among these sub-areas, the results indicated that there were emerging areas such as collective indexing, image retrieval in terms of multi-language and multi-culture environments, and affective indexing and use. For the user-centered image retrieval research, college and graduate students were found prominent user groups for research while specific user groups such as medical/health related users, artists, and museum users were found considerably. With the comparison with the distribution of sub-areas of image retrieval research in Korea, considerable similarities were found. The findings of this study expect to guide research directions and agenda for future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cawkell, A. E. 1992. "Selected Aspects of Image Processing and Management: Review and Future Prospects." Journal of Information Science, 18: 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159201800303
  2. Chen, H. L. 2001. "An Analysis of Image Retrieval Tasks in the Field of Art History." Information Processing & Management, 37(5): 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00049-2
  3. Chu, H. 2001. "Research in Image Indexing and Retrieval as Reflected in the Literature." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12): 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1153
  4. Chung, E. and J. Yoon. 2009. "Categorical and Specificity Differences between User-Supplied Tags and Search Query Terms for Images: An Analysis of "Flickr" Tags and Web Image Search Queries." Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 14(3) [online]. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
  5. Cooper, H. and L. V. Hedges. 1994. The handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  6. Enser, P. 2000. "Visual Image Retrieval: Seeking the Alliance of Concept-Based and Content-Based Paradigms." Journal of Information Science, 26(4): 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600401
  7. Enser, P. 2008. "The Evolution of Visual Information Retrieval." Journal of Information Science, 34(4): 531-546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508091013
  8. Given, L. M., S. Ruecker, H. Simpson, E. B. Sadler, and A. Ruskin. 2007. "Inclusive Interface Design for Seniors: Image Browsing for a Health Information Context." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11): 1610-1617. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20645
  9. Goodrum, A. A. 2000. "Image Information Retrieval: An Overview of Current Research." Informing Science, 3(2): 63-66. https://doi.org/10.28945/578
  10. Joho, H. and J. M. Jose. 2008. "Effectiveness of Additional Representations for the Search Result Presentation on the Web." Information processing & management, 44(1): 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.004
  11. Jorgensen, C. 2007. "Image Access, the Semantic Gap, and Social Tagging as a Paradigm Shift." Advances in Classification Research Online, 18(1) [online]. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
  12. Kelly, D. and C. R. Sugimoto. 2013. "A Systematic Review of Interactive Information Retrieval Evaluation Studies, 1967-2006." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4): 745-770. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22799
  13. Lee, H. J. and D. Neal. 2010. "A New Model for Semantic Photograph Description Combining Basic Levels and User-Assigned Descriptors." Journal of Information Science, 36(5): 547-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510374930
  14. Liu, Y., D. Zhang, G. Lu, and W. Y. Ma. 2007. "A Survey of Content-Based Image Retrieval with High-Level Semantics." Pattern Recognition, 40(1): 262-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045
  15. Mehtre, B. M., M. S. Kankanhalli, and W. F. Lee. 1998. "Content-Based Image Retrieval Using a Composite Color-Shape Approach." Information Processing & Management, 34(1): 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00049-6
  16. Menard, E. 2010. "Ordinary Image Retrieval in a Multilingual Context: A Comparison of Two Indexing Vocabularies." Aslib proceedings, 62(4/5): 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531011074672
  17. Menard, E. 2011. "Indexing and Retrieving Images in a Multilingual World." NASKO, 1(1): 105-106.
  18. Menard, E. 2012. "Digital Image Description: A Review of Best Practices in Cultural Heritage Institutions." Library Hi Tech, 30(2): 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239960
  19. Persson, O. 2000. "Image Indexing - A First Author Co-Citation: A Longitudinal Journal Co-Citation Analysis of An Emerging Interdisciplinary Field." Scientometrics, 41: 389-410.
  20. Petrelli, D. and P. Clough. 2012. "Analysing User's Queries for Cross-Language Image Retrieval from Digital Library Collections." Electronic Library, 30(2): 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211221331
  21. Petticrew, M. and H. Roberts. 2008. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Pu, H. T. 2005. "A Comparative Analysis of Web Image and Textual Queries." Online Information Review, 29(5): 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520510628864
  23. Rasmussen, E. 1997. "Indexing Images." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32: 169-196.
  24. Rieh, S. Y. & B. Hilligoss. 2008. "College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process." In Metzger, Miriam J. & Andrew J. Flanagin. eds. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 49-72). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  25. Savolainen, R. 1995. "Everyday Life Information Seeking: Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of "Way of Life"." Library & information science research, 17(3): 259-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-8188(95)90048-9
  26. Sun, A., S. S. Bhowmick, N. Nguyen, K. Tran, and G. Bai. 2011. "Tag-Based Social Image Retrieval: An Empirical Evaluation." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12): 2364-2381. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21659
  27. Tsai, C. F. 2003. "Stacked Generalisation: A Novel Solution to Bridge the Semantic Gap for Content-Based Image Retrieval." Online Information Review, 27(6): 442-445. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520310510091
  28. Tsai, C-F. 2007. "A Review of Image Retrieval Methods for Digital Cultural Heritage Resources." Online Information Review, 31(2): 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710747220
  29. Yang, C. C. 2004. "Content-Based Image Retrieval: A Comparison between Query by Example and Image Browsing Map Approaches." Journal of information Science, 30(3): 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504044670
  30. Yoon, J. 2008. "Searching for An Image Conveying Connotative Meanings: An Exploratory Cross-Cultural Study." Library & Information Science Research, 30(4): 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.004
  31. Yoon, J. 2011. "A Comparative Study of Methods to Explore Searchers' Affective Perceptions of Images." Information Research, 16(2) [online]. [cited 2014.10.10]. .
  32. Zachary, J. and S. S. Iyengar. 2001. "Information Theoretic Similarity Measures for Content Based Image Retrieval." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(10): 856-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1139

피인용 문헌

  1. 랜드마크 이미지 AI 학습용 데이터 구축을 위한 메타데이터 표준 설계 방안 연구 vol.54, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2020.54.2.419