DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical scaling method for underwater hydrodynamic model test of submarine

  • Moonesun, Mohammad (National University of Shipbuilding Admiral Makarov (NUOS), Faculty of Ship Design, Ukraine and researcher in marine faculty of MUT) ;
  • Mikhailovich, Korol Yuri (National University of Shipbuilding Admiral Makarov (NUOS), Faculty of Ship Design) ;
  • Tahvildarzade, Davood (Marine Research Centre (MRS), M.Sc. in Naval Engineering) ;
  • Javadi, Mehran (Aero-Maritime Science & Research Center, Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), M.Sc. in Naval Engineering)
  • Received : 2014.06.16
  • Accepted : 2014.11.04
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

This paper provides a practical scaling method to solve an old problem for scaling and developing the speed and resistance of a model to full-scale submarine in fully submerged underwater test. In every experimental test in towing tank, water tunnel and wind tunnel, in the first step, the speed of a model should be scaled to the full-scale vessel (ship or submarine). In the second step, the obtained resistance of the model should be developed. For submarine, there are two modes of movement: surface and submerged mode. There is no matter in surface mode because, according to Froude's law, the ratio of speed of the model to the full-scale vessel is proportional to the square root of lengths (length of the model on the length of the vessel). This leads to a reasonable speed and is not so much for the model that is applicable in the laboratory. The main problem is in submerged mode (fully submerged) that there isn't surface wave effect and therefore, Froude's law couldn't be used. Reynold's similarity is actually impossible to implement because it leads to very high speeds of the model that is impossible in a laboratory and inside the water. According to Reynold's similarity, the ratio of speed of the model to the full-scale vessel is proportional to the ratio of the full-scale length to the model length that leads to a too high speed. This paper proves that there is no need for exact Reynold's similarity because after a special Reynolds, resistance coefficient remains constant. Therefore, there is not compulsion for high speeds of the model. For proving this finding, three groups of results are presented: two cases are based on CFD method, and one case is based on the model test in towing tank. All these three results are presented for three different shapes that can show; this finding is independent of the shapes and geometries. For CFD method, Flow Vision software has been used.

Keywords

References

  1. K. J. Rawson and E. C. Tupper, Basic Ship Theory, Jordan Hill., Oxford, p. 731, 2001.
  2. H. A. Jackson, Submarine Design Notes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, p. 520, 1982.
  3. M. Moonesun, Handbook of Naval Architecture Engineering, Kanoon Pajohesh., Isfahan, p. 1003, 2009.
  4. V. Lewis Edward, Principles of Naval Architecture (Second Revision), Volume II - Resistance, Propulsion and Vibration, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1988.
  5. V. Bertram, Practical Ship Hydrodynamics, Elsevier Ltd., UK, p. 369, 2000.
  6. M. Moonesun, M. Javadi, P. Charmdooz, and U. M. Korol, "Evaluation of submarine model test in towing tank and comparison with CFD and experimental formulas for fully submerged resistance," Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Science, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1049-1056, 2013.
  7. C. K. Hah, L. Y. Lim, and J. S. Ki, "Hydrodynamic evaluation for developing the inflatable kayak," Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, vol. 37, no 6, pp. 623-630, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2013.37.6.623
  8. M. S. Kim and K. S. Lee, "Hydrodynamic force calculation and motion analysis of OC3 hywind floating offshore platform," Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Engineering, vol. 37, no. 8 pp. 953-961, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2013.37.8.953
  9. D. J. Yeo and K. P. Rhee, "A study on the sensitivity analysis of submersibles' manoeuvrability," Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 458-465, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.5.458
  10. Y. K. Shin and S. K. Lee, "A study on the modeling of hydrodynamic coefficient for the emergency maneuver simulation of underwater vehicle," Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 601-607, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.6.601
  11. D. J. Yeo, H. K. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, and C. M. Lee, "A research on the mathematical modeling for the estimation of underwater vehicle's tail plane efficiency," Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 190-196, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.3.190
  12. V. Bertram, Practical Ship Hydrodynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Oxford OX2 8DP, p. 65, 2000.
  13. A. F. Molland, S. R. Turnock, and D. A. Hudson, "Ship resistance and propulsion", Cambridge University Press, p. 14, 2011.
  14. S. F. Hoerner, Fluid Dynamic Drag, USA, 1965.
  15. Iranian Defense Standard (IDS-857), Hydrodynamics of Medium Size Submarines, 2011.
  16. M. Moonesun, "Introduction of Iranian hydrodynamic series of submarines (IHSS)," Journal of Taiwan Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 155-162, 2014.
  17. M. Moonesun and P. Charmdooz, "General arrangement and naval architecture aspects in midget submarines", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Underwater System Technology Theory and Applications, Malaysia, 2012.
  18. A. Budiyono, "Advances in unmanned underwater vehicles technologies: modeling, control and guidance perspectives," Indian Journal of Marine Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 282-295, 2009.
  19. J. M. Lee, J. Y. Park, B. Kim, and H. Baek, "Development of an autonomous underwater vehicle IsiMI6000 for deep sea observation," Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Science, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1034-1041, 2013.
  20. M. Moonesun, U. M. Korol, V. O. Nikrasov, S. Ardeshiri, and D. Tahvildarzade, "Proposing new criteria for submarine seakeeping evaluation", Proceedings of the 15th Marine Industries Conference (MIC2013), Kish Island, 2013.
  21. R. Burcher and L. J. Rydill, Concept in Submarine Design, Cambridge University Press, p. 295, 1998.
  22. ITTC, "Sample work instructions calibration of load cells," ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Procedure 7.6-02-09, Revision 00, http://ittc.sname.org/CD%202011/pdf%20Procedures%202011/7.6-02-09.pdf, Accessed November 11, 2014.
  23. ITTC, "Ship models," ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Procedure 7.5-01-01-01, Revision 03, http://ittc.sname.org/CD%202011/pdf%20Procedures%202011/7.5-01-01-01.pdf, Accessed November 11, 2014.
  24. ITTC, "Testing and extrapolation methods, general guidelines for uncertainty analysis in resistance towing tank tests," ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Procedure 7.5-02-02-02, Revision 01, http://ittc.sname.org/CD%202011/pdf%20Procedures%202011/7.5-02-02-02.pdf, Accessed November 11, 2014.
  25. P. N. Joubert, Some Aspects of Submarine Design: Part 1: Hydrodynamics, Australian Department of Defense, 2004.
  26. M. Mackay, The Standard Submarine Model, A Survey of Static Hydrodynamic Experiments and Semiempirical Predictions, Defence R&D Canada, 2003.
  27. J. H. Ferziger, M. Peric, Computational Method for Fluid Dynamics, Springer., verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, p. 423, 2002.
  28. R. Roddy, Investigation of the Stability and Control Characteristics of Several Configurations of the DARPA SUBOFF Model (DTRC Model 5470) from Captive-Model Experiments, Report No. DTRC/SHD-1298-08, 1990.
  29. S. Shi, X. Chen, J. Tan, "Study of resistance performance of vessels with notches by experimental and computational fluid dynamics calculation methods," Journal. of Shanghai Jiaotong University, vol. 15, pp. 340-345, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-010-1014-2
  30. P. Timothy, Verification of a Six-degree of Freedom Simulation Model for the REMUS Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, MS Thesis, Joint Program in Applied Ocean Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Ocean Engineering., Mechanical Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, University of California at Davis, 2001.
  31. P. C. Praveen, P. Krishnankutty, "Study on the effect of body length on hydrodynamic performance of an axi-symmetric underwater vehicle," Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Science, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1013-1022, 2013.

Cited by

  1. Optimization on submarine stern design vol.231, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090215625673
  2. Computational fluid dynamics analysis on the added resistance of submarine due to Deck wetness at surface condition vol.231, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090215626462
  3. Numerical Flow Characterization around a Type 209 Submarine Using OpenFOAM vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6020066