References
- Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1683-1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
- Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1017
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 13 (pp. 1-62). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physic work at university. Research in Science Education, 37, 449-467 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9035-4
- Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367685
- Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
- Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
- Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2010). Researching children's experience: Methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Resear ching children's experience (pp. 1-21). London: SAGE Publications.
- Han, K., & Noh, S. (2003). An analysis on the utilization of teacher's guides for science in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
- Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. Los Angeles, LA: Sage Publication.
- Jeon, Y. M. (2006). Understanding American teachers' use of teachers' manuals: Two case studies. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(3), 5-24.
- Jo, K. (2005). Using examples and students' conceptual understanding in school science: Focusing on concepts of mechanics. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University.
- Kang, C., Kwon, D., Shin, M., Lee, S., Song, J., Seo, G., Lee, G., & Lee, B. (2013). Innovation school. Seoul: Jihak Publishing Co.
- Kweon, J., Chung, W., & Kim, Y. (2001). Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 75-90.
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
- Mansour, N. (2010). Impact of the knowledge and beliefs of Egyptian science teachers in integrating a STS based curriculum: a sociocultural perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9193-0
- Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers' beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230-1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.743196
- Mayoh, K., & Knutton, S. (1997). Using out-of-school experience in science lessons: Reality or rhetoric? International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 849-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190708
- National Curriculum Information Center. (2014). Korean curriculum. Retrieved June 14, 2014, from http://www.ncic.re.kr/
- Oloruntegbe, K. O., & Ikpe, A. (2010). Ecocultural factors in students' ability to relate science concepts learned at school and experienced at home: Implications for chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 266-271.
- Osborne, R. J., Bell, B. F., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Science teaching and children's views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528830050101
- Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland: Heinemann.
- Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
- Park, H. J. (2007). Components of conceptual ecologies. Research in Science Education, 37, 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9023-8
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(20), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
- Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20203
- Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016619705184
- Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455
- Sosniak, L. (2001). The 9% challenge: Education in school and society. Retrieved May 14, 2013, from http://www.tcrecord.org/
- Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Upadhyay, B. R. (2006). Using students' lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher's thinking. Science Education, 90(1), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20095
- Vygotsky, L. S.(1934). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, ed., 2012). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017
- Wassermann, S., & Ivany J. W. G. (1996). The new teaching elementary science: who's afraid of spiders? (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Yu. G., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Cited by
- 초등학교 과학 교과서의 거꾸로 수업 활용 가능성에 대한 교사들의 인식 - 한국과 싱가포르 교과서 비교 연구 - vol.36, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.2.163
- Development of TPACK-P Education Program for Improving Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Pre-service Teachers vol.22, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2017.22.07.141
- '모두를 위한 과학교육'을 실현하기 위한 과학 학습 정체성에 대한 사회문화적 접근 연구 동향 분석 vol.38, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.187