참고문헌
- Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are they difference? International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1745-1765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601075629
- Cavagnetto, A. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336-371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
- Choi, A., Hand. B., & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students' written arguments in general chemistry laboratory investigations. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1763-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9330-1
- Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
- Grimberg, B., & Hand, B. (2009). Cognitive Pathways: analysis of students' written texts for science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 503-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701704805
- Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070252
- Jang, K. H. (2013). Effect of argumentation-based negotiation in the science writing heuristic(swh) approach on students' question and claim-evidence(Doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University).
- Jang, K. H., Nam, J. H., & Choi, A. R. (2012). The effects of argument-based inquiry using the science writing heuristic approach on argument structure in science writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1099
- Kang, N. H., & Lee, E. M. (2013). An analysis of inquiry activities in high school physics textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.132
- Kelly, G., Chen, C., & Prothero, W. (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline: writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 691-718. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<691::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-G
- Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography student use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86, 314-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
- Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: connecting knowledge production with to learn in science. Science Education, 83(2), 115-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kingir, S., Geban, O., & Gunel, M. (2012). How does the science writing heuristic approach affect students' performance of different academic achievement levels? A case for high school chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20013A
- Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
- Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
- Kwak, K. H., & Nam, J. H. (2009). Enhancing the quality of students' argumentation and characteristics of students' argumentation in different contexts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(4), 400-413.
- Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.). Reading science: critical and functional perspectives of discourses of science(pp. 87-111). Oxford: Routledge.
- Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2009). 2009 Science Education Curriculum. Notification No. 2009-41 of the Ministry of Education. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
- Nam, J. H., Kwak, K. H., Jang, K. H., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using science writing heuristic in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
- Nam, J., Choi, A., & Hand, B. (2011). Implementation of the science writing heuristic approach in the 8thgrade science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1111-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9250-3
- Nam, J. H., Koh, M. R., Bak, D. C., Lim, J. H., Lee, D. W., & Choi, A. R. (2011). The effects of argumentation-based general chemistry laboratory on pre-service teachers' understanding of chemistry concepts and writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1077-1091.
- National Research Council. (2013). The next generation science standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
- Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
- Park, S. H., & Chung, Y. L. (2012). The effect of science writing heuristic on scientific inquiry skills, logical thinking, and metacognition of middle school students. Biology Education, 40(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.3.367
- Park, S., & Moon, S. (2013). The effect of the Science Writing Heuristic laboratory class on creative thinking and critical thinking of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1259-1272. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1259
- Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00003-0
- Rivard, L., & Straw, S. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: an exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U
- Rudd, J., Greenbowe, T., & Hand, B. (2007). Using the science writing heuristic to improve students' understanding of general Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(12), 2007-2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p2007
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education; current perspectives and recommendations for future direction. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Sampson, V., Groom. J., & Walker, J. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: an exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
- Sandoval, W., & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanation. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Shin, S. Y., Choi, A. R., & Park, J. Y. (2013). The effects of the science writing heuristic approach on the middle school students' achievements. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 952-962. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.952
- Shin, J. W., & Choi, A. R. (2014). Trends in research studies on scientific arguments and writing in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0107
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
피인용 문헌
- The Process of Group Writing and Processes Factor vol.35, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0585
- Analysis of Biology Contents in the Secondary School Teacher’s Certification Examination of 2014-2017: Focus on Core Concepts, Inquiry Skills, Problem Solving Skills and Answer Structure vol.21, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2017.21.4.383