Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Construct Validation of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle school Science(AEQ-KMS)

한국 중학생의 과학영역 성취정서 질문지(AEQ-KMS) 개발과 타당화

  • Received : 2014.09.25
  • Accepted : 2014.12.26
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Students experience a variety of achievement-related emotions during the process of learning the science curriculum. The purpose of this study is to develop an achievement emotions questionnaire for Korean middle school science curriculum to measure the achievement emotions that middle school students experience during study of this curriculum, and verified its validity. The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle School Science is based on the English version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire, developed with reference to Korean middle school science curriculum and the characteristics of science study, from the perspective of the control-value theory of achievement. It has 232 questions, configured to measure nine achievement emotions across three types of academic settings. The questionnaire results can be treated with a high degree of confidence according to the result of our validation, which also verified that the achievement emotions of these students are configured with four internal criteria (learning strategy, achievement motivation and course grade), as suggested by the control-value theory; this in turn verifies that the nine achievement emotions are sufficiently distinctive across study situations. Last, it was verified that the questionnaire has sufficient external validity based on a comprehensive examination of the relation between science achievement emotions and the four criterion variables for each student. This suggests that through the development and implementation of this quantitative questionnaire, basic ground was provided to understand the achievement emotions experienced by middle school students learning the science curriculum.

본 연구의 목적은 한국 중학생들이 과학을 학습하는 과정에서 경험하는 성취정서를 측정하기 위한 질문지를 개발하고 그 타당성을 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구에서 개발한 한국 중학생의 과학영역 성취정서 질문지는 영어판 성취정서 질문지를 바탕으로 중학교 교과 운영 특성 및 과학 학습의 특징을 반영하여 개발되었다. 총 232문항으로 3가지 학업상황에서 9개의 과학 영역 성취정서를 측정하도록 구성되어 있으면 통제-가치 이론에 근거를 두고 있다. 검증 결과, 높은 신뢰도를 보였으며, 성취정서의 4가지 구성요인 체계를 확인하기 위한 확인적 요인분석(CFA) 결과, 질문지의 각 문항이 성취정서의 구성 요인을 대표하는 지표로서 적절히 구성되어 있었으며 구조적으로 타당하였다. 또한 질문지를 통하여 측정되는 성취정서들 사이의 상관관계를 분석한 결과, 같은 상황에서 경험하는 각각의 정서 및 서로 다른 상황에서 경험하는 동일한 정서가 서로 적절히 변별 되었다. 성취정서와 학업상황 사이의 잠재적 관계에 대한 확인적 요인 분석 결과에서도 질문지의 내적 구조와 동일하게 3가지 학업상황 및 9가지 성취정서가 잠재변수로서 작용하고 있음을 확인하였다. 외적 타당도 검증은 통제-가치 평가, 학습 전략, 성취동기, 과학 성적 등을 준거 변인으로 하여 실시하였으며 검증 결과, 충분한 외적 타당도를 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 정량적으로 분석할 수 있는 질문지의 개발을 통해 중학교 과학 교과에서 학생들이 경험하는 성취정서를 이해하는 기본 발판이 마련되었음을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
  2. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park: Sage.
  3. Calkins, S. D., & Dollar, J. M. (2014). Caregiving influences on emotion regulation: Educational implications of a biobehavioral perpective. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia(Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 520-538). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  4. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  5. Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In E. L. Deci(Ed), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 43-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & Williams-Johnson, M. R. (2014). The influence of culture on emotions: Implications for education, In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 539-557). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  7. Do, S. L. (2008), Issues and Prospects of Research on Affect in Education. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 919-937
  8. Do, S. L., Son, S. K., Byun, J. H., & Lim, J. (2011). Development and Construct Validation of the Korean. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(4), 945-970
  9. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  10. Elliot, A. J., & Pekrun, R. (2010). Emotion in the hierarchical model of approach-avoidance achievement motivation. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 57-73). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
  11. Frentzel, A., Pekrun, P., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics - a "hopeless" issue? a control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173468
  12. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002
  13. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.1.5-29
  14. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  15. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation model. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  17. Kim, E., & Yang, M. (2011). An Exploratory Study on Academic Emotions of Korean students. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 501-521.
  18. Kim, M. (2009). Emotion in Learning Context: Its Origins and Functions. Asian Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2009.10.1.004
  19. Korean Educational Psychology Association (KEPA). (2000). Terminology of educational psychology. Seoul: Hakjisa Co.
  20. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9028-x
  21. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and effect: An asymmetrical bidiredtional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
  22. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
  23. Pekrun, R. (2006) The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  24. Park, J. G. (2011). Understanding Students' Achievement Emotions Usign the Control-Value Theory: The Roles of Motivational Beliefs in Physical Education Classes. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 22(3), 153-169.
  25. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
  26. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotion in student's learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
  27. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  28. Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  29. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ)
  30. Ruthig, J. C., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P., (2009). Perceived Academic Control: mediating the effedts of optimism and social support on college students' psychological health. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9079-6
  31. Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0002
  32. Yang, M., & Kwon, J. (2013). A study on the profile analysis of academic emotion and it's relation to self-regulated learning. Studies on Korean Youth, 24(4), 203-229.

Cited by

  1. The Effects of Teacher’s Science-related Attitudes and Students’ Academic Emotions on Their Science-related Attitudes in Elementary School vol.31, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2019.2.31.1.163
  2. 과학 관련 정의적 영역 검사 도구 활용 및 개선 내용 분석 vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.2.263
  3. Analysis of Equivalence and Reliability of Korean Translated Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefits vol.16, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.200025