References
- Andersen, I.L., Boe, K.E., Kristiansen, A.L., 1999. The influence of different feeding arrangements and food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci. 65, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00058-1
- Anil., L., Anil, S.S., Deen, J., Baidoo, S.K., Walker. R.D., 2006. Effect of group size and structure on the welfare and performance of pregnant sows in pens with electronic sow feeders. Can. J. of Vet. Res. 70, 128-136.
- Bates, R.O., Edwards, D.B., Korthals. R.L., 2003. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls. Livest. Prod. Sci. 79, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00119-7
- Broom, D.M., Mendl, M.T., Zanella, A.J., 1995. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim. Sci. 61, 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800013928
- Brouns, F., Edwards, S.A., 1994. Social rank and feeding behaviour of grouphoused sows fed competitively or ad libitum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90158-9
- Eddison, J.C., Roberts, N.E., 1995. Variability in feeding behaviour of group-housed sows using electronic feeders. Anim. Sci. 60, 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980000847X
- Gonyou, H.W., 2001. The social behaviour of pigs. In: Keeling, L.J., Gonyou, H.W. (Eds.), Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. CABI International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 147-176.
- Hunter, E.J., Broom, D.M., Edwards, S.A., Sibly, R.M., 1988. Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer-controlled feeder. Anim. Prod. 47, 139-148 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100037144
- Jensen, K.H., Pedersen, B.K., Pedersen, L.J., Jorgensen, E., 1995. Well-being in pregnant sows: confinement versus group housing with Electronic Sow Feeder. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A. Anim. Sci. 45, 266-275.
- Jensen, K.H., Sorensen, L.S., Bertelsen, D., Pedersen, A.R., Jorgensen, E., Nielsen, N.P., Vestergaard, K.S., 2000. Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group housing systems with electronic sow feeding: a field trial. Anim. Sci, 71, 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055260
- Lee, J.Y., Jeon, J.H., Kim, H.J., Song, J.I., 2013. The Effects of Different Housing with Automatic Feeder on Sow Performances and Growth Performances of Piglets during Gestation. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 19, 141-148.
- Li, Y.Z., Wang, L.H., Johnson, L.J., 2012. Sorting by parity to reduce aggression toward first-parity sows in group-gestation housing systems. J. Anim. Sci. 90, 4514-4522. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4869
- Olsson, A.C., Andersson, M., Botermans, J., Rantzer, D., Svendsen, J., 2011. Animal interaction and response to electronic sow feeding (ESF) in 3 different herds and effects of function settings to increase capacity. Livest. Sci. 137, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.10.014
- Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G., 1980. Statistical Methods (7th ed). Iowa State University Press. Ames, IA.
- Song, J.I., Lee, J.Y., Cheon, S.N., Kim, D.H., Park, K.H., Jeon, J.H., 2013. Development of an electronic sow feeder for gestation sows. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 19, 117-122.