DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In Vitro Developmental Competence of Porcine SCNT Embryos is improved by m-Carboxycinnamic Acid Bishydroxamide, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor

  • Park, Sang-Hoon (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Ran (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Suk (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Baek, Sang-Ki (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jin, Sang-Jin (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Wook (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeon, Sang-Gon (Department of Food and Resource Economics, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yoon, Ho-Baek (Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Hee (Department of Animal Bioscience, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2014.10.23
  • Accepted : 2014.11.05
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

Differentiated nuclei can experimentally be returned to an undifferentiated embryonic status after nuclear transfer (NT) to unfertilized metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Nuclear reprogramming is triggered immediately after somatic cell nucleus transfer (SCNT) into recipient cytoplasm and this period is regarded as a key stage for optimizing reprogramming. In a recent study (Dai et al., 2010), use of m-carboxycinnamic acid bishydroxamide (CBHA) as a histone deacetylase inhibitor during the in vitro early culture of murine cloned embryos modifies the acetylation status of somatic nuclei and increases the developmental competence of SCNT embryos. Thus, we examined the effects of CBHA treatment on the in vitro preimplantation development of porcine SCNT embryos and on the acetylated status of histone H3K9 on cloned embryos at the zygote stage. We performed the three groups SCNT: SCNT (NT), CBHA treatment at the porcine fetus fibroblast cells (PFFs) used as donor cells prior to SCNT (CBHA-C) and CBHA treatment at the porcine SCNT embryos during the in vitro early culture after oocyte activation (CBHA-Z). The PFFs were treated with a $15{\mu}M$ of CBHA (8 h) for the early culture and the porcine cloned embryos were treated with a $100{\mu}M$ concentration of CBHA during the in vitro early culture (10 h). Cleavage rates and development to the blastocyst stage were assessed. No significant difference was observed the cleavage rate among the groups (82.6%, 76.4% and 82.2%, respectively). However, the development competence to the blastocyst stage was significantly increased in CBHA-Z embryos (22.7%) as compared to SCNT and CBHA-C embryos (8.6% and 4.1%)(p<0.05). Total cell numbers and viable cell numbers at the blastocyst stage of porcine SCNT embryos were increased in CBHA-Z embryos as compared to those in CBHA-C embryos (p<0.05). Signal level of histone acetylation (H3K9ac) at the zygote stage of SCNT was increased in CBHA-Z embryos as compared to SCNT and CBHA-C embryos. The results of the present study suggested that treatment with CBHA during the in vitro early culture (10 h) had significantly increased the developmental competence and histone acetylation level at the zygote stage.

Keywords

References

  1. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstrom EW, Echelard Y (1999): Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature Biotech 17:456-461. https://doi.org/10.1038/8632
  2. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S, Bishop M (2000): Production of cloned piglets from in vitro systems. Nature Biotech 18:1055-1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
  3. Bhaumik SR, Smith E, Shilatifard A (2007): Covalent modifications of histones during development and disease pathogenesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1337
  4. Campbell KH, Fisher P, Chen WC, Choi I, Kelly RD, Lee JH, Xhu J (2007): Somatic cell nuclear transfer: Past, present and future perspectives. Theriogenology 68:214-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.059
  5. Campbell KH, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1996): Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64-66. https://doi.org/10.1038/380064a0
  6. Campbell KHS, Alberio R, Choi I, Fisher P, Kelly RDW, Lee JH, Maalouf W (2005): Cloning: eight years after dolly. Reprod Dom Anim 40:256-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00591.x
  7. Cervoni N, Szyf M (2001): Demethylase activity is directed by histone acetylation. J Biol Chem 276:40778-40787. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103921200
  8. Chesne P, Adenot, PG, Viglietta C, Baratte M, Boulanger L, Renard JP (2002): Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature Biotech 20:366-369. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0402-366
  9. Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce de Leon, FA, Robl JM (1998): Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 280:1256-1258. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5367.1256
  10. Csordas A (1990): On the biological role of histone acetylation. Biochem J 265:23-38.
  11. Costa-Borges N, Santalo J, Ibanez E (2010): Comparison between the effects of valproic acid and trichostatin a on the in vitro development, blastocyst quality, and full-term development of mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Reprogram 12:437-446. https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0108
  12. Costa-Borges N, Gonzalez S, Santalo J, Ibanez E (2011): Effect of the enucleation procedure on the reprogramming potential and developmental capacity of mouse cloned embryos treated with valproic acid. Reproduction 141:789-800. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0455
  13. Cui XS, Xu YN, Shen XH, Zhang LQ, Zhang JB, Kim NH (2011): Trichostatin a modulates apoptotic-related gene expression and improves embryo viability in cloned bovine embryos. Cell Reprogram 13:179-89. https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2010.0060
  14. Dai X, Hao J, Hou XJ, Hai T, Fan Y, Yu Y, Jouneau A, Wang L, Zhou Q (2010): Somatic nucleus reprogramming is significantly improved by m-carboxycinnamic acid bishydroxamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. J Biol Chem 285: 31002-10. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.136085
  15. Das ZC, Gupta MK, Uhm SJ, Lee HT (2010): Increasing histone acetylation of cloned embryos, but not donor cells, by sodium butyrate improves their in vitro development in pigs. Cell Reprogram 12:95-104. https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0068
  16. Ding X, Wang Y, Zhang D, Wang Y, Guo Z, Zhang Y (2008): Increased preimplantation development of cloned bovine embryos treated with 5-aza-2 9-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A. Theriogenology 70:622-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.042
  17. Eberharter A, Becker PB (2002): Histone acetylatio: a switch between repressible and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics. EMBO Reports 3:224-229. https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvf053
  18. Enright BP, Kubota C, Yang X, Tian XC (2003): Epigenetic characteristics and development of embryos cloned from donor cells treated by trichostatin A or 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Biol Reprod 69:896-901. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017954
  19. Enright BP, Sung LY, Chang CC, Yang X, Tian XC (2005): Methylation and acetylation characteristics of cloned bovine embryos from donor cells treated with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Biol Reprod 72:944-948. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.033225
  20. Galli C, Lagutina I, Crotti G, Colleoni S, Turini P, Ponderato N, Duchi R, Lazzari G (2003): Pregnancy: a cloned horse born to its dam twin. Nature 424:635.
  21. Gurdon JB, Melton DA (2008): Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science 322:1811-1815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160810
  22. Hebbes TR, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C (1988): A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J 7:1395-1402.
  23. Hong L, Schroth GP, Matthews HR, Yau P, Bradbury EM (1993): Studies of the DNA binding properties of histone H4 amino terminus. Thermal denaturation studies reveal that acetylation markedly reduces the binding constant of the H4 "tail" to DNA. J Biol Chem 268:305-314.
  24. Iager AE, Ragina NP, Ross PJ, Beyhan Z, Cunniff K, Rodriguez RM, Cibelli JB (2008): Trichostatin a improves histone acetylation in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer early embryos. Cloning Stem Cells 10:371-379. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2007.0002
  25. Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001): Translating the histone code. Science 293:1074-80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063127
  26. Jouneau A, Renard JP (2003): Reprogramming in nuclear transfer. Curr Opin Genet Develop 13:486-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.007
  27. Kikuchi H, Fujimoto D (1973): Multiplicity of histone deacetylase from calf thymus. FEBS Letters 29:280-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(73)80038-9
  28. Kishigami S, Mizutani E, Ohta H, Hikichi T, Thuan NV, Wakayama S, Bui HT, Wakayama T (2006): Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340:183-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.164
  29. Kouzarides T (2007): Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005
  30. Lee BC, Kim MK, Jang G, Oh HJ, Yuda F, Kim HJ, Hossein MS, Kim JJ, Kang SK, Schatten G, Hwang WS (2005): Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells. Nature 436:641. https://doi.org/10.1038/436641a
  31. Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP (1993): A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell 72:73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90051-Q
  32. Li Z, Sun X, Chen J, Liu X, Wisely SM, Zhou Q, Renard JP, Leno GH, Engelhardt JF (2006): Cloned ferrets produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Develop Biol 293:439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.016
  33. Maalouf WE, Liu Z, Brochard V, Renard JP, Debey P, Beaujean N, Zink D (2009): Trichostatin A treatment of cloned mouse embryos improves constitutive heterochromatin remodeling as well as developmental potential to term. BMC Develop Biol 9:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-9-11
  34. Meng Q, Polgar Z, Liu J, Dinnyes A (2009): Live birth of somatic cell-cloned rabbits fellowing trichstatin A treatment and cotransfer of parthenogenetic embryos. Cloning Stem Cells 11:203-208. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2008.0072
  35. Misteli T (2007): Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128:787-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028
  36. Miyoshi K, Mori H, Mizobe Y, Akasaka E, Ozawa A, Yoshida M, Sato M (2010): Valproic acid enhances in vitro development and Oct-3/4 expression of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Reprogram 12:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2009.0032
  37. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H, Perry AC (2000): Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science 289:1188-1190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5482.1188
  38. Ono T, Li C, Mizutani E, Terashita Y, Yamagata K, Wakayama T (2010): Inhibition of class IIb histone deacetylase significantly improves cloning efficiency in mice. Biol Reprod 83:929-937. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.085282
  39. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH (2000): Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 7:86-90.
  40. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J (2001): Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development (Review). Science 293:1089-1093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063443
  41. Shi LH, Miao YL, Ouyang YC, Huang JC, Lei ZL, Yang JW, Han ZM, Song XF, Sun QY, Chen DY (2008): Trichstatin A (TSA) improves the development of rabbit intraspecies cloned embryos, but not rabbit-human interspecies cloned embryos. Develop Dynam: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists 237:640-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21450
  42. Shin T, Kraemer D, Pryor J, Liu L, Rugila J, Howe L, Buck S, Murphy K, Lyons L, Westhusin M (2002): A cat cloned by nuclear transplantation. Nature 415:859. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature723
  43. Shi, Yang (2007): Taking epigenetics center stage. Cell 128:639-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.011
  44. Shi W, Hoeflich A, Flaswinkel H, Stojkovic M, Wolf E, Zakhartchenko V (2003): Induction of a senescent-like phenotype does not confer the ability of bovine immortal cells to support the development of nuclear transfer embryos. Biol Reprod 69:301-309. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.012112
  45. Su J, Wang Y, Li Y, Li R, Li Q, Wu Y, Quan F, Liu J, Guo Z, Zhang Y (2011): Oxamflatin significantly improves nuclear reprogramming, blastocyst quality, and in vitro development of bovine SCNT embryos. PLoS One 6:23805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023805
  46. Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P (2007): Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell 128:747-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.010
  47. Svensson K, Mattsson R, James TC, Wentzel P, Pilartz M, MacLaughlin J, Miller SJ, Olsson T, Eriksson UJ, Ohlsson R (1998): The paternal allele of the H19 gene is progressively silenced during early mouse development: the acetylation status of histones may be involved in the generation of variegated expression patterns. Development 125:61-69.
  48. Vajta G, Zhang Y, Macha'ty Z (2007) Somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs: recent achievements and future possibilities. Reprod Fertil Develop 19:403-423. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06089
  49. Van Thuan N, Bui HT, Kim JH, Hikichi T, Wakayama S, Kishigami S, Mizutani E, Wakayama T (2009): The histone deacetylase inhibitor scriptaid enhances nascent mRNA production and rescues full-term development in cloned inbred mice. Reproduction 138: 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0299
  50. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R (1998): Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394: 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1038/28615
  51. Wang F, Kou Z, Zhang Y, Gao S (2007): Dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation in the first cell cycle of cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 77:1007-1016. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.063149
  52. Wrenzycki C, Wells D, Herrmann D, Miller A, Oliver J, Tervit R, Niemann H (2001): Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biol Reprod 65:309-317. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.1.309
  53. Wu X, Li Y, Li GP, Yang D, Yue Y, Wang L, Li K, Xin P, Bou S, Yu H (2008): Trichostatin A improved epigenetic modifications of transfected cells but did not improve subsequent cloned embryo development. Anim Biotech 19:211-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495390802271482
  54. Yang X, Smith SL, Tian XC, Lewin HA, Renard JP, Wakayama T (2007): Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nature Genet 39:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1973
  55. Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, Beppu T (1990): Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem 265:17174-17179.
  56. Yu Y, Ding C, Wang E, Chen X, Li X, Zhao C, Fan Y, Wang L, Beaujean N, Zhou Q, Jouneau A, Ji W (2007): Piezo-assisted nuclear transfer affects cloning efficiency and may cause apoptosis. Reproduction 133:947-954. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0358
  57. Zhang Y, Li J, Villemoes K, Pedersen AM, Purup S, Vajta G (2007): An epigenetic modifier results in improved in vitro blastocyst production after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cloning Stem Cells 9:357-363. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2006.0090
  58. Zhao J, Ross JW, Hao Y, Spate LD, Walters EM, Samuel MS, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS (2009): Significant improvement in cloning efficiency of an inbred miniature pig by histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 81:525-530. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.077016
  59. Zhou Q, Renard JP, Le Friec G, Brochard V, Beaujean N, Cherifi Y, Fraichard A, Cozzi J (2003): Generation of fertile cloned rats by regulating oocyte activation. Science 302:1179. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088313
  60. Zlatanova J, Caiafa P, Van Holde K (2000): Linker histone binding and displacement: versatile mecha nism for transcriptional regulation. FASEB J 14:1697-1704. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.99-0869rev
  61. Zuccotti M, Garagna S, Redi CA (2000): Nuclear transfer, genome reprogramming and novel opportunities in cell therapy. J Endocrin Invest 23:623-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03343786